Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Taurus Model 85

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by .., Dec 28, 2006.

?

Taurus Quality is

  1. On par with S&W

    39 vote(s)
    47.0%
  2. Better than S&W

    8 vote(s)
    9.6%
  3. Worse than S&W

    36 vote(s)
    43.4%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ..

    .. Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2003
    Messages:
    578
    Thinking about picking up a Taurus instead of a J frame at the gun show. I like the grip better on the Taurus and where the lock is located. Is Taurs on par with S&W? Any problems with their lock?
     
  2. Sistema1927

    Sistema1927 Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2004
    Messages:
    4,589
    Location:
    "Land of (dis)Enchantment"
    I didn't vote, due to the fact that I have had mixed results with Taurus over the years.

    I had a pre-lock 85CH that was OK, about on par with my S&W J-frames. I found that it was too heavy for my purposes, and sold it, but it was a good revolver.

    I had a Taurus 94 (.22 LR) that was crap, and would misfire several rounds per cylinder. I unloaded it as quickly as possible at a loss.

    I have a pair of recent manufacture Taurus Gauchos in .45 Colt that are as good as anything made by any manufacturer. I wouldn't trade them for anything. No problems with the lock, and being as it is in the hammer it is about as unobtrusive as any such device could be.
     
  3. MCgunner

    MCgunner Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    25,069
    Location:
    The end of the road between Sodom and Gomorrah Tex
    My 85UL has the best out of the box DA trigger I've ever sampled on a J frame of any brand or make including Smith and Wesson. It's accurate and easy to carry and I like the stock grip, too. You can buy grips for a gun you don't like the grip on, though. But, the little Taurus is a better gun for me than a concealed hammer gun and it does a find job for quite a bit less money than a Smith. The quality of the trigger seals the deal for me. I would not hesitate to buy a comparable Smith, but you're not going to find one for the money I spent on the Taurus. In this case, IMHO, you don't get more for your money. You'll be spending even more to get that trigger as nice as my Taurus.
     
  4. Baba Louie

    Baba Louie Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    3,831
    Not really on par but close enough (usually)
    No problems w/ lock on either brand (never ever use it).

    I've had 2 - 85's and a 605 and have never had a problem with any of them... one 85 was pre-lock. I've also got a 3" 82 and a 431 (.44 spl) pre lock and they're also dependable, look good, accurate and fun.

    But they're not S&W's FWIW. (thinking resale value)

    You know you can replace the grips on a J-frame right? It's no big deal.

    But I agree about the lock placement. Much prefer Taurus' placement.
     
  5. meef

    meef Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,649
    Location:
    Oregon
    Har har! Punny, very punny!

    :D
     
  6. Smilin Jack

    Smilin Jack Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2006
    Messages:
    65
    Location:
    western Oregon
    Taurus 85 w/Crimson Trace laser

    Hey,
    I have a Taurus 85 with no hammer lock (early model). I bought it new and pretty much have carried it every day since in a Galco SOB158 holster. It has a Crimson Trace set of laser grips and makes nice small groups on paper at the length of our local indoor range - 60 ft.

    I've put coffee cans of mid-range wadcutters thru the model 85 and still seems tight and shoots nice groups. Without the laser grips, it was hard to hit the paper at 60 ft. Glad I got the Crimson Trace. Check out their webpage.

    When out in the forest, my Glock 21 (45 Auto) goes and the Taurus 85 stays home. The 38 Special might be a tad small for bears, bigfoots etc. Haven't carried the 357 Mag in years, but it still goes to the indoor range.

    Smilin Jack
    Western Oregon
     
  7. SouthpawShootr

    SouthpawShootr Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    2,627
    Location:
    Chesapeake, VA
    It's worse than S&W. But not by much and if you can handle the gun, just take it through steps in Jim March's Revolver Checkout and you should be fine. Sure Taurus has a lifetime warranty and, if you buy a gun with a problem, they'll make it right, but you'll lose the gun for months in the process. I'll add that my experience with 2 individual 85s has been great. It's a meat and potatoes gun that's been in the lineup for a long, long time. I'll wager it's one of the best sellers, if not the best seller in the Taurus product line.

    BTW, current Taurus rubber is about the best I've seen any factory field on any gun. Last few I've bought, I didn't bother with replacement stocks.
     
  8. 10-Ring

    10-Ring Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,037
    Location:
    California
    I've had spotty experience w/ Taurus but I have a buddy who owns several Taurus wheelguns & each one is very nice & a great value. I would think that as long as you can fondle the gun & maybe dry fire it a little before you put your money down, you should be okay.
     
  9. Arcticfox

    Arcticfox Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2006
    Messages:
    280
    I have both a Taurus and a Smith (both in .44 mag.) The trigger on the Taurus is NOT EVEN CLOSE to the smooth pull of my Smith.

    I do like my Taurus however, and it is my pack gun for hiking, and carry.

    I have heard several people say that the trigger on their model 85 is second to none. I cannot say the same about my taurus model.
     
  10. 1 old 0311

    1 old 0311 member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2005
    Messages:
    2,672
    Location:
    Planet Earth
    I own both. I also voted worse. Longevity is better with the Smith.
     
  11. tango3065

    tango3065 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    851
    Location:
    Kentucky
    I have owned 3 taurus revolvers and 2 had to go back for repairs withing the first couple hundred rounds and the I now own 0, I have owned several S&W revolvers and still have them all with none needing repairs ;) .
     
  12. TIMC

    TIMC Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    2,793
    Location:
    Texas
    I have had my Mod 85 for a couple years with no problems. As someone else said I to have had hit and miss trouble with Taurus firearms. I have a PT940 that I really like a lot but it has had to go back to Taurus twice for the same problem. I have 3 S&W handguns and I can say I have never had a problemm with any onf them.
     
  13. Jkwas

    Jkwas Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2006
    Messages:
    600
    Location:
    Boca Raton Fl. "The Gunshine State"
    I voted on par as long as we're talking current production models. I have a 3yr old taurus 605 (.357 model small frame) with over 1000 rounds thru it. Only problem I ever had was a worn out hammer spring which I upgraded to the S&W standard to make it right. Even though the factory boot grips are good, I changed to the factory combat grips which is simply a matter of taste. Shoots accurately, points naturally (which for a snub is really important), and the fit and finish is as nice as anything I've ever seen. For half the price of a S&W, I'd say it's a good deal.
    To say it's as good as an older model S&W, well it's not. But neither is a current prodution S&W either.
     
  14. MCgunner

    MCgunner Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    25,069
    Location:
    The end of the road between Sodom and Gomorrah Tex
    I have an older M66 that has a somewhat rough DA especially compared to my M10. My newer gun with the newer transfer bar action is very smooth, almost as good as that old, well broken in early 60s vintage M10. But, my M85UL beats even the M10! It's pretty awesome.

    Around this neck of the woods, the Smith and Wesson snobs must be thick, because I can't find a decent deal on an old used Smith. I have found bang up deals on Taurus M66s, though, they seem to be in abundance at every gun show and the best deals in the house. I pick 'em up, I check for end shake, timing, this and that, then I bargain on 'em. My 4" nickel gun was a KILLER deal, newer model lock work, like new, NO end shake or other excessive play, like new with one little blemish of holster wear on the cylinder that's hardly noticeable. I gave $197 for that gun and it's more accurate than my M19 or my Security Six were. I won't ever let that one go!

    I got a 3" blued M66 at a gun show the other day. It had a timing issue and some holster wear, fairly tight with a little play compared to the newer one and not as smooth a trigger. I bargained it down to $180. Then, playing with it at home, I took the side plate off and found the cylinder hand/pawl spring was binding. I fixed that and timing is perfect!:D

    I can't seem to find a M10 for under $300 in any condition around here and M19s and 66s, forget it! I can get a new gun for what one in good condition brings. I know, if I had an FFL, I could order one, but I don't. I know a guy I could order one through, but I will NOT buy a used gun without first checking it out. I have no bias one way or the other in handgun brands. I know I can get a Ruger or Taurus that's just as good as a Smith for a lot less money. I've even owned 7 Rossis. I just check 'em out, make sure they're in good mechanical condition before I buy and if there are flaws and I think it'll still be serviceable, I'll use that to bargain the price with. As long as prices on Smiths remain as high as they are around here and Taurus revolvers are as low as they are, I'll continue to buy mostly used Taurus. I would like a titanium Tracker, but that's just more money than I can pony up for a revolver right now. I'm more of a $200 bargain kinda guy. :D I continue looking for affordable Smiths. I'd like to find a 2" M10 for under $300 in decent shape, right, dream on. I might even buy another 4" gun (have one already) just so I can buy a 2" barrel to replace on it later, if I could get one of those $200 bargains I always hear about. But, I'm NOT ordering one. I gotta see it first.
     
  15. jon_in_wv

    jon_in_wv Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Messages:
    3,816
    I have a Taurus M85 and I used to own a S&W 442. Other than the heavier frame I can't really tell the difference between them. My M85 does have a better trigger.
     
  16. Moondoggie

    Moondoggie Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2004
    Messages:
    724
    Location:
    Small Town, Nebraska
    I've had a M85 snubby stainless for about 15 yrs.

    It goes bang every time, and is perfectly adequate for it's intended purpose which is close quarters personal defense. I didn't buy it for bears or target shooting or to be a safe queen.

    I wouldn't hesitate to buy another one.
     
  17. lawboy

    lawboy Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2003
    Messages:
    415
    I had a model 85CH for a number of years. I honestly did not shoot it much for the first 7 or eight years I owned it, hardly shot it at all, actually. Well, finally I did start shooting it some around 2004. Lo and behold, the forcing cone up and split on me! A nice piece of it just cracked lean off! I sent it back and they replaced the barrel for free. All looked fine BUT, the new barrel had not been indexed properly. There was a visible cap between the ejector shroud and the front of the frame and the barrel was canted. The gun shot way to the left. I sold it. I have not owned another Taurus since, although I have been tempted at times. I am once bitten twice shy.
     
  18. MCgunner

    MCgunner Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    25,069
    Location:
    The end of the road between Sodom and Gomorrah Tex
    I had a Model 10 Smith forcing conel split on me, once. That's why it wears a heavy barrel now, that and I prefer heavy barrels. I really don't know what caused it to split, was shooting wadcutters, but I took it out of the safe and to the range and never looked into the barrel. Heck, might have been a spider in there or something. It don't take much obstruction to cause that.
     
  19. Jkwas

    Jkwas Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2006
    Messages:
    600
    Location:
    Boca Raton Fl. "The Gunshine State"
    Amen brother. When I go target shooting, I take the model 10. When I go out at night, it's the 605.
     
  20. ..

    .. Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2003
    Messages:
    578
    Opinions seem split, slight edge to Smith. Guess I'll try a couple Taurus' and Smiths. A bit harder at the show than a shop. I'm gonna go late in the day hoping it's not so busy.
     
  21. wcwhitey

    wcwhitey Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2006
    Messages:
    1,010
    Owned one for a few years. An older Model 85, bought it new in 86' for $145. It was a nice gun, shot well, had no problems for the 1000 or so rounds I put through it. From what I can recall the fit and finish was pretty good and the wood stocks were decent. It was all I could afford at the time and it fit the bill.
    I cannot speak for the recent guns, with or without the safety lock. Having said that, my only advice would be find the patience, save the dollars and buy what your really want. If the Taurus seems like the best gun, buy it, if it has a problem, send it back. If the Smith is what you really desire, save the money and buy one. You have to be confident in the gun you choose to protect yourself and practice with it often. Bill
     
  22. jad0110

    jad0110 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,047
    Location:
    Somewhere between the Eastern Block states and Flo
    I am no Smith snob, hard to tell from my signature line. I am open to most makes, though I just really like the trigger on my S&Ws.

    I used two own to Taurus wheel guns:

    1. M66 6" stainless. Good finishing except for a few tool marks on the underside of the barrel. The trigger pull was just as slick as my classic K-22, however like most Tauri, the trigger pull seemed to stack a bit just before release which negatively effected its predictability, but it wouldn't be a deal breaker. Still a very nice gun, the only reason why I sold it was because I did not like the 6" full underlug barrel, it just never seemed to balance right like my current 4" S&W 686. I never experienced a single problem with my M66.

    2. M94 4" stainless. The gun from H*ll. No misfires, but the trigger pull made me think that maybe there were rocks behind the side plate. Lots of 'em. Terrible big burr about 1/3 of the way through the pull, so bad that it made accurate DA firing next to impossible. I got fired in SA a lot, which defeats the purpose of having a DA 22. Worse, the cylinder would bind after 50 rounds on average. And I do eject my spent cases straight down. I'd even clean the cylinder and forcing cone after every few cylinder fulls. Sent it back to Taurus once. Did not fix either problem. I took it to a local gunsmith who got the trigger to the point where it was tolerable, but the gun would still bind after 100 rounds even after the cylinders were chamfered and the cylinder to forcing cone gap was adjusted. Needless to say I replaced the Taurus with one awesome S&W K-22 and have not looked back.

    The 94 does appear to be hit or miss for Taurus. Some get good ones, but it seems many more get lead spitting turds like mine.

    I would consider another Taurus in the future. Most of their products are very good, and like any manufacturer, they have their lemmons. The one drawback with Taurus is their resale value. They depreciate as bad as, well, a Ford Taurus.
     
  23. longtooth

    longtooth Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2005
    Messages:
    281
    Location:
    Lufkin, Texas
    I voted on par w/ smith.
    For my use that is correct. I will shoot it at the range but not going to compete or put 150 rds a week through it. I will carry it as a Sunday carry when I have a tucked shirt & no coat. Any other time I cannot carry .45.
    For that I do not need the other $150.00 invested.
    Major range work, competition, field carry, & even winter carry when more than a light cover is warented for the weather, I will carry my 4" S&W 66.
    Primary will still be the Kimber most of the time but, this old man still likes the feel of a good revolver.
     
  24. MCgunner

    MCgunner Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    25,069
    Location:
    The end of the road between Sodom and Gomorrah Tex
    While a rough DA seems to be the norm for .22 revolvers of all makes/brands, I have heard so much negative about the 94 Taurus, I think I'll avoid that one in the future. There seem to be a lot of complaints about it. I have a Rossi (also a rough DA) that shoots very well, so don't need a .22 revolver anyway.
     
  25. 420Stainless

    420Stainless Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Messages:
    1,212
    Location:
    MS
    I came late to the revolver game; bought my first one seven years ago. It is an all steel model 85 purchased for the wife back when S&W was not available at the LGS due to the Clinton collaboration. No troubles so far, it seems on par with the Smith & Wessons I've acquired since. I prefer S&W in support of domestic manufacture, but I can't honestly tell much difference in the quality.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page