Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Texas personal vehicle search at workplace

Discussion in 'Legal' started by GI_Jared, Feb 10, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. GI_Jared

    GI_Jared Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Messages:
    279
    My little brother works in south Texas at oil rig sites for weeks at a time. These drill sites have a no weapons policy, but this is commonly broken because people keep a firearm in their car for defense when driving the roads of south Texas. So once they pull into the confines of the drill site they are in violation of company policy.

    I was talking to him tonight and he said that a company that he frequently works for is going to be bringing out state troopers to perform inspections of people's vehicles to ensure that they are all complying with company policy. I told him that police can't just search your vehicle without some sort of just cause, and was pretty sure that it was not illegal to store a firearm in a personal vehicle regardless of company policy.

    However, I am not from Texas and do not know the laws there. I would hope that people would be able to have a firearm for defense when driving on those roads. If anyone has some insight into the legality of this it would be appreciated.
     
  2. NavyLCDR

    NavyLCDR member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Messages:
    7,691
    Location:
    Stanwood, WA
    Well, when police in Alamogordo, New Mexico attempted to enforce company policy, the courts ruled that the police violated the person's rights who was carrying the gun and the city settled out of court for $21,000. I see the same thing happening in Texas. The police have the authority to detain a person under suspicion of committing a crime only - NOT enforcing a company policy.

    http://www.examiner.com/article/alamogordo-police-pay-21-000-to-settle-open-carry-lawsuit
     
  3. CountGlockulla

    CountGlockulla Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2011
    Messages:
    196
    Location:
    Texas
    A few years back Texas had tried passed a law allowing you to keep a handgun in your car even on company premises, however, it did not make it up for vote before the congressional session ended. Unless the law has changed the company can search your brothers car on their property.
     
  4. Skylerbone

    Skylerbone Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    3,378
    Sounds like a very gray area in need of a professional opinion. I work for a municipality with a no firearms policy which means I carry after 4pm and on weekends. My pistol stays at home, off property and I avoid the unemployment line.
     
  5. JohnKSa

    JohnKSa Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    12,352
    Location:
    DFW Area
    That is correct. The police can't search without your permission or probable cause. Suspecting you of having a firearm in your car would not be probable cause because you can legally have a firearm in your vehicle in TX--although it must be concealed from view if it is a handgun.

    If you refuse permission, the police will not search your car, but you will be fired.
    No, they can not. But they CAN ask you for permission to search it and fire you for refusing to allow the search.
    It was reintroduced in a subsequent legislative session and passed. However, there are some exceptions. As I recall, the big oil & gas companies had enough money and influence to get themselves excepted from the law.
     
    Last edited: Feb 10, 2013
  6. GI_Jared

    GI_Jared Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Messages:
    279
  7. joeschmoe

    joeschmoe Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1,291
    Sounds like talk to scare people into compliance. In Texas it is illegal to violate the owners right to prohibit the carrying of arms on private property.
    But that doesn't mean they can get the troppers to search everyone entering their property to check for compliance.

    Property owners/employers have rights and so do employee's. Usually one ends where the other begins.
     
  8. NavyLCDR

    NavyLCDR member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Messages:
    7,691
    Location:
    Stanwood, WA
    1. The company can search ONLY if the person consents to it. They can certainly fire the person for not consenting (or any other reason they choose).

    2. I would think it would be a misuse of public resources for the State Troopers, while on duty, to be used to perform private employer procedures. They can hire the State Troopers on their off-duty time to perform the searches ONLY if the subject consents.
     
  9. Texan Scott

    Texan Scott Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2012
    Messages:
    3,184
    Location:
    The Texas Hill Country
    As of September 1, 2011, most Texas employers cannot prohibit employees from possessing guns in their locked, personal vehicles on employers’ premises. Texas Senate Bill 321 (“SB 321”) – which Governor Rick Perry signed into law on June 17, 2011, and which goes into effect on September 1, 2011 – restricts public and private employers from prohibiting an employee who holds a concealed handgun license or “who otherwise lawfully possesses a firearm, or who lawfully possesses ammunition” from transporting or storing firearms or ammunition in a locked, privately owned motor vehicle located in a parking lot, parking garage or other parking area the employer provides for the employee. There are exceptions to this prohibition: 1. Employees still cannot possess firearms in locations prohibited by state or federal law (e.g., Texas Penal Code § 46.03 prohibits individuals from possessing firearms on school premises, secured areas of airports, polling places, and other locations); 2. The prohibition does not apply to: (a) school districts; (b) open-enrollment charter schools; (c) private schools; or (d) non-employer-owned property that is subject to a valid, unexpired oil, gas, or other mineral lease that contains a provision prohibiting the possession of firearms on the property; and 3. The prohibition does not apply to property owned or leased by a chemical manufacturer or oil and gas refiner with an air authorization under the Texas Clean Air Act and on which the primary business conducted is the manufacture, use, storage or transportation of hazardous, combustible, or explosive materials, unless the employer’s employee parking lot, parking garage or other parking area is outside of the secured and restricted area that contains the physical plant, is not open to the public and has constant security personnel-monitored access.
     
  10. dogtown tom

    dogtown tom Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,301
    Location:
    Plano, Texas
    1. Does he hold a Texas CHL?
    2. "State troopers" do not work for the oil company.
    3. Here is the link to SB321 @ DPS.
    http://www.legis.state.tx.us/tlodocs/82R/billtext/pdf/SB00321F.pdf#navpanes=0

    Wrong.
    See above, its been law since September, 2011.
     
  11. NavyLCDR

    NavyLCDR member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Messages:
    7,691
    Location:
    Stanwood, WA
    Do you know what statute that became?
     
  12. JohnKSa

    JohnKSa Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    12,352
    Location:
    DFW Area
    The section numbers that were added/modified are in the bill.

    Sections 52.061, 52.062, 52.063, 52.064, and 411.203

    Section 52 is the Labor Code, 411 is the Government Code
     
  13. slamfirev10

    slamfirev10 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2009
    Messages:
    210
    on duty troopers have better things to do
     
  14. Double Naught Spy

    Double Naught Spy Sus Venator

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    9,631
    Location:
    Forestburg, Texas
    They won't be on-duty troopers. They will be off-duty troopers moonlighting just like the officers at my kids' school moonlight in uniform as security for the school.
     
  15. whatever

    whatever Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    285
    If he is on a rig and the mineral lease on which the rig is drilling has provisions regarding firearms, then the terms of the lease MAY preclude the carrying of firearms on the lease premisis.

    All this talk about not consenting to searches is all well and good, but if the employer (or their agent i.e. off duty trooper hired by the company) is doing the search, anyone not consenting to the search can be fired on the spot. Consenting to searches typically only applies to official (i.e. LEO) searches.

    Mineral leases are filed of public record. Pull the lease at the county clerk's office and take a look at the ter.s of the lease itself.
     
  16. alsaqr

    alsaqr Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2007
    Messages:
    3,351
    Location:
    South Western, OK
    Oklahoma was the first state to have a law allowing guns in locked vehicles in parking lots. Weyerhaeuser in SW OK for years had allowed guns in vehicles in parking lots. Then the plant got a new manager who outlawed guns in vehicles. The company brought in local police and sniffer dogs. The company terminated everyone who had a gun in their vehicle. This brought on a bunch of lawsuits and two OK laws.

    The second OK law has been tested in federal court: OK employers may not outlaw guns in locked vehicles in parking lots.

    http://workplaceviolencenews.com/?p=1955&upm_export=print
     
    Last edited: Feb 11, 2013
  17. Double_J

    Double_J Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2012
    Messages:
    394
    Location:
    Montgomery AL for now
    If the officer is OFF-DUTY then he is no different than the average security guard at the mall. He can wear his uniform, and has powers of arrest for STATE LAWS, COUNTY AND CITY LAWS, but otherwise he can not arrest you for violating company policy. I would refuse to allow my vehicle to be searched, and if they fire me then I will go to the local paper/internet/media outlet and make a BIG stink about State Troopers being used to enforce private company policy. Write a letter to the state police commander, state legislature, attorney general, and who ever else you can find and embarrass the trooper, and the company.

    This is not an easy fight, but we can not allow the company to rule our life by using the law enforcement agents against us in an unethical fashion. I am by no means a union supporter as I have seen too much negative from them, but I will agree that you will have to stand together to beat a large opponent such as an oil/gas company. If that means forming a picket line, then do it. Walk out on strike, picket, write letters, slow down production, do what is needed to get your point across. I believe it was one of the founding fathers who said we must all hang together or we will all hang separately. The police should NOT be used to intimidate people going into work. Should the company want to search hire a regular security officer, not an off duty law enforcement officer who can project the wrong image to the public.
     
  18. whatever

    whatever Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    285
    This isn't a company v. Gun owner issue (in this particular employee on a drilling rig case). It is a private property owner (i.e. the landowner who entered into the lease) v. gun owner issue. It is no dofferent than a homeowner forbidding someone from carrying a gun in their house.

    If an employee carries a gun on the leased property, assuming the appropriate language in the lease, the lease can terminate and the company could be out tens of millions of dollars (or more).

    Picket all you want, but it would be against the property owner not the company/sheriff.

    Of course, this all assumes the appropriate lease terms. Do your due diligence to see if it applies.
     
  19. Skylerbone

    Skylerbone Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    3,378
    I'd guess the land owner would prefer fewer holes in his fence posts, fewer poached deer and fewer dead roughnecks on his property. As strongly as I feel about the right to carry, it does not trump the right of a private citizen to refuse trespass.
     
  20. Txhillbilly

    Txhillbilly Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2008
    Messages:
    506
    Location:
    Where Else! TEXAS
    I work in the Oil/Gas industry in Texas.
    You cannot carry weapons onto an oil/gas lease period,whether you have a CHL or not.
    Believe me,with the hours we work,and the stress that goes with most of the jobs out here,the last thing you want is someone loosing their cool and shooting a firearm around one of these wells.
    I carry,but my vehicle is parked at our company lot where the Oil field law doesn't apply,but I don't carry out in the field.

    While some might not agree with this,99.9% of the people that work in the oil patch do,and I'm one of them.
     
  21. golfer_ray

    golfer_ray Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2012
    Messages:
    98
    In my OKC CC class, I brought up the question if company policy forbids firearms in employee cars in the parking lot, but one has a cc permit, which prevails. The attorney stated that your car is considered your personal property, so your firearm is covered.
    Although we may hate Texas in football, they are kindred brothers in many ways and, if anything, more liberal in their interpretation of the law than we are.
     
  22. vtail

    vtail Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2009
    Messages:
    339
    alsaqr:

    But does this allow a teacher to leave a loaded gun in his car in the school parking lot?
     
  23. chris in va

    chris in va Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Messages:
    6,097
    Location:
    Louisville KY
    Alright, so park just past the property and walk to the site. :cool:
     
  24. rhinoh

    rhinoh Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2007
    Messages:
    1,097
    Location:
    SC/NC
    Sounds great until you realize that it might be miles from the "allowed" area....
     
  25. Double Naught Spy

    Double Naught Spy Sus Venator

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    9,631
    Location:
    Forestburg, Texas
    You can do that, but it won't embarrass anybody as it is SOP for many companies and it is a practice and one filled by LEOs across the state. The only person being embarrassed would be you. The company would like the press because it will show the other employees how serious they are about compliance and enforcement. You will be doing the company a favor.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page