The 1 Rifle, 1 Handgun Experiment. Ever try it?

Status
Not open for further replies.
In NYC, you only get 1 gun on your carry, "they did allow me 2 after about 10 years, This was from 1972 to 1994, When I sold the Business and moved to FL. So "Yes", I did do that 1 gun "model 60 S&W", for 10 years, I then got a BPS, for birds. So I had a 12 gauge and a 38.
Honestlly I didn't think about it because that's all you could have other than hunting or target rifles. It was less time consuming I can tell you that. And you get very good with that gun when you shoot in a club every week. So I can see that happening with little problem. I would go for a Glock 26 and an AR, "only because my back problems make firing a shotgun difficult. I explained that the other day in a post on shotguns.
 
I wouldn't want to do the experiment. I have a small collection of 14 fire arms and only shoot two or 3 on a regular basis. Honestly I probably don't need anything but my carry gun and my shot gun but I know I'd end up missing my other guns. My carry gun is a poly, but I'd feel weird with out my .357 and my 1911.
The only way I'd try the experiment is if I was forced to by a job loss or something.
 
About 25 years ago I was fresh out of the Army, new married and damn broke.
I had three guns at the time, an 1873 Winchester carbine reproduction in .45 Colt, a Smith and Wesson 25-7 in the same caliber, and a Stevens 311 12 guage side by side 26" IC/M.

I honestly don't think I could get along with just two guns as I have always felt compelled to have a rifle, a pistol, and a shotgun, at all times
 
But has anyone here ever ACTUALLY tried it? I'm not talking about buying your first gun and then buying others. I'm talking about divesting yourself of your entire existing collection, going down to one rifle and one pistol and living life that way for a while.

Why would I try it? The only time in my life that I have only had two guns is when I about 15. I constantly wanted more guns. I see no reason to not have more than two firearms unless you are just starting out. We all start out at zero and go from there.
 
Odd that I came by this thread because I was about to start one about how I think I could be totally and completely happy with one handgun and one rifle.

The handgun would be my 5 1/2 Ruger SBH. Very accurate with MCB Co. 240 grain LSWC be it a light load of Trail Boss or a full dose of IMR 4227. Absolutely a joy to shoot, and it is fun when you hit what you aim at every time you pull the trigger, and it being a nice looking gun helps as well. It would be a good gun for stopping dangerous animals, 2 legged threats, and for hunting. Being that it is single action would be the only downfall for defense if you were in a true gun fight, but the odds are low for that happening at this time.
Load it light to conserve on powder. Use lead bullets to save on money. You can reuse your brass forever if you load to around 800-1000 fps. Can also be loaded with shot for extermination of rodents. Actually the .44 Magnum has very few limitations in any situation from 0 to 100 yards.

The rifle would be my Marlin Model 60 which is dead eye accurate especially out to 50 yards. It would kill deer (only in survival situations; I don't break regulations, and I do not condone shooting deer with .22 LR), pigs, birds, rabbits, and squirrels for food, and I can carry 1000 rounds very easily. It is also a very good and quite defensive round if you need to sneak out of a situation. You can shoot it fast, very fast without loosing point of aim. Busting off 20 shot of .22LR in seconds at virtually the same location is a big plus, and Two legged threats need to be worried with someone who has a .22 LR, and is very familiar with it, and most who own one are. Why? Because it is cheap to shoot so you shoot it a lot more than anything else in the safe. It also has zero recoil so the fundamentals of rifle shooting are usually used/concentrated on more often instead of worrying about recoil. You actually shoot your rifle correctly which leads to better accuracy.

There is another factor. They are just plain fun to shoot. Like tonight I sold some Harley mufflers that I had swapped out the baffles in to a range owner. We talk, and I am pretty much on a first name basis with everyone at the range. So before I left I said, care if I shoot this .44 Mag I have in my bag. I was shooting 7.3 grains TB, Win Brass (loaded probably 8 times), CCI LP primers, and a 240 grain LSWC from MCB Co., and @ 25 yards I was shooting 1.5 to 2" groups offhand, and one handed at times. Low recoil, low report, and still moving around 900 fps. That is still a load that would penetrate deeply into any game or threat, and could be used to kill deer or wild hog easily within range.

I often think that a double action .44 Magnum would be nice. I will probably buy one soon. I am thinking about the S&W model that is a light weight revolver, and loading to just over .44 SPC velocities with a 200 grain lead or soft point bullet for a carry gun.
At this time I do not have an Auto Pistol in my possession. I own one, but all I have are revolvers in the house, and they have really grown on me. The feel and the accuracy of the revolver is nice, but also not having to chase brass is probably the biggest plus.


Sorry for the long post. Yes, I have thought of the one rifle one handgun gun owner before, and those would be my pick.
 
I'm not sure I understand the context of your question, Warp? Would I carry a 5 1/2" .44 Magnum? Sure. If open carry was legal in my state. I'd like to cross draw it, but I think I mentioned the light weight S&W for a new carry gun in .44 Mag coming in the near future.

Was that part of the OP's question? It had to be a carry handgun? I thought it was just one and one question?

Sure. If it came down to it only owning two of my guns in my safe. Those two, the Marlin Mod 60 and the Ruger SBH would be the two most likely to stay. I'd be hard to let the Marlin lever guns go as well as it'd be hard to let the 30 round VZ folding stock go, but for all practical uses those two would keep me happy and safe. Even in a survival situation. The .22 LR holds 15 rounds, and I have speed loads for it also, and even though it is small in caliber it is deadly.
 
I should have added "or will you be disarmed the majority of the time" at the end of my post ;)

I personally don't understand how people pick their only gun as a non handgun or their only handgun as something seemingly too big and bulky to actually have when they need it.

Then again if you live in IL or Kali or NYC that won't be a factor.
 
"I personally don't understand how people pick their only gun as a non handgun or their only handgun as something seemingly too big and bulky to actually have when they need it."

There are three answers to this:

1. To young to carry.
2. Work/live were it's illegal to carry
3. The vast majority of people are too immature to take responsibility for their and others' safety and delegate it to others. Even if they have a permit they don't carry. And of course there are a huge number who don't even own a firearm for crying out loud.


Cat
 
Remember the people this question is being asked of.

1. I assume that if they are keeping a handgun they own they are old enough to carry, or that they plan for the very near future

2. Fortunately this does not apply to most of the United States

3. Obviously posters on THR discussing which guns they would keep own a firearm
 
People carried a 7 1/2" or larger handgun for years, and they even rode horses doing it. A good belt and holster setup is all that is needed. A 5 1/2" revolver in a good shoulder rig is not an out of the question either.

I think most are disarmed the majority of the time because of laws prohibiting them to not carry by law. Not by the limitation of gun they carry. If not the .44 Magnum I have now I guess it have to be a .45 ACP 1911 which is still over 5" long. Even my XD9 is over 5" long, and just as wide as the SBH.
 
People carried a 7 1/2" or larger handgun for years, and they even rode horses doing it. A good belt and holster setup is all that is needed. A 5 1/2" revolver in a good shoulder rig is not an out of the question either.

You going to conceal a 5 1/2" revolver in a shoulder holster all day every day?
 
What if I did or do? I am not getting dragged into a CCW debate. The question was 1 rifle/1 handgun. Also I don't have to be where I need a gun all day every day. I am not that paranoid.

At this time I gave my answers because they are my favorites to shoot. I am proficient with both of them, they are cheap to shoot, and I have complete confidence in their ability to accomplish any task that I may come across within range. If I need to shoot as someone @ 200+ yards to save my life. I should just be bugging out the other way. Not trying to play Army. Either rifle or handgun that I mentioned will give me the protection I need at the distance of front door to street, a city block, or maybe two city blocks. That is as far as I feel I need if there was a S&G situation, but as it is now that isn't the case.

I now carry a 2" revolver, but I would not choose it as my only handgun.
 
Last edited:
Nope, and as long as I live in a Constitutional Republic, I never will.
I've played the hypothetical "1 pistol, 1 rifle, 1 shotgun" game, and as long as it's hypothetical, it's all good.

Just too many holes to make it work in the real world.
 
44 in a shoulder holster

My brother had a friend that carried a long barrel Model 29 s&w 44 magnum in a shoulder holster virtually all the time. He usually wore a jacket.
 
I've seen threads dedicated to "what if you could only have one rifle and one pistol..."

But has anyone here ever ACTUALLY tried it?

(1)Did you do it? Did you sell everything except for one rifle and one pistol?

(2)What did you keep?

(3)In fact, have you ever gone down to just one gun? What was it?

1. No

2. if I were to do it I'd take a 20" Winchester 1892 and a S&W revolver holding as many rounds as possible, both chambered in .357mag

3. 20 years ago I had one gun. My pride and joy. All I could afford being 19-20 years old. It was a Sig P226. I put wood grips on it, it was slick. Wish I still had that pistol.
 
Ran into rough times some years ago. Had to sell off many guns. Kept a 6 inch M19 S&W 357 Mag. Needed the 6 inch for hunting in the state I lived in then. Had a lot of brass and bullets for the 38/357 so it just made sense then. Next thing I picked up was a .303 No.4 sporterized and with a new barrel. Got along with those two for a long time. Shortened the 303 barrel, fitted a new front sight and set up for a scout type mounted scope. Half-way decent 10 shot hunting/defense rifle.

An option today would be an AR rifle with different top ends in different calibers.
A 1911 with conversion units like 22lr and 460 Rowland could be the pistol.

Also some single shot long guns can be rifle/shotgun/muzzle loader.

I would hate to go back to just a few guns but it could happen to anybody.
 
I have about 14 guns total, but I an about to be using 1911s, ar-pattern rifles, and my 870 near exclusively. I will still use my 22-250 bolt rifle, and if I get a KSG the 870 will be entirely for hunting, but even though I have 3 .22 pistols, the one I mostly use is my 1911 conversion.

I guess I just like to keep things simple.
 
Taking the OP "literally"...

(One pistol and one rifle)... I'd choose a .308 Win and 9mm Luger.

Expanding the choices to (one each long gun and handgun)... I'd opt for 12ga and .357 Mag (or 9mm).

Expanding to (one each rifle, shotgun, and handgun)... then .308 Win, 12ga, and .357 Mag (or 9mm).

I like the commonality of NATO cartridges so I might drop the .357 Mag even though it's more versatile. Also, in my area, these will do anything I need except varmint hunting.
 
No, and I don't think I realistically could "get by" with less then 5. If I had to go down to 5 it would probably be as follows:

Ruger 10/22
Ruger 22/45
Mossberg 500
AR-15
Glock 26

Realistically, I shoot both of the .22's most often at the range. It's just a whole lot of fun for a reasonable amount of $ and more practice and time spent plinking is a good thing.

The Glock 26 would work as (and does when not carrying the LCP) my CCW and home defense handgun.

The Mossberg 500 works great in a home defense role and could utilize other barrels and loads for other purposes.

The AR can also pretty much be leggo'ed into whatever I need.

Though when all is said and done... Life is too short to have just a few guns. In theory though 5 is really as low as I'd want to go.

YMMV,

Mike
 
It wasn't a deliberate plan, but for quite a long time, I had a Ruger MKII .22 pistol, and a .50 T/C Hawken, and nothing else. The Hawken did fine for most of my hunting, but when I wanted to hunt birds, I had to borrow a shotgun. I did most of my shooting with the .22.

I was in college, and pretty poor most of the time. I bought the .22 and traded a custom knife I made for the rifle. The .22 was a deliberate choice - I figured I'd be able to afford to shoot it, and my wife would like it, and it would do for anything we needed a gun for if we had to. The rifle was an opportunity that I took advantage of.

It wasn't that big of a deal. I was busy working and going to school, and I took the opportunity to go shooting whenever I could.

Yeah, I could do it again ... but my dog and I would both miss my shotgun, and I'd have a tough time picking between the rifles and the pistols for which would stay and which would go.

Nah, I guess I couldn't do it unless financially forced to do so.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top