My ghost ring sights: the saga continues
Well, I just called XS to discuss my sighting problems with the ghost rings. (Finally! Should have done this a month ago, but ... busy ... ).
Looks like this is not going to be a quick fix.
To review, when I mounted the sights and took the rifle (my 336A) to the range, even with the rear sight screwed all the way down, I was still hitting very high - 8 to 10" - at 50 yds. This suggested that I needed a taller front sight so that the barrel would be lower, thus lowering the groups.
First, I'll say that once again I was impressed with the kindness and efficiency that I experienced in the conversation. Very professional, all questions answered, no impatience demonstrated. A+ service.
His recommendation: go back to the range. Set the rear sight "three full turns" from 'bottomed out'. Shoot at either 50 yds, 100 yds (or some other measured distance), then measure the distance from center group to POA. Let them know the range (50, 100, etc) and that average distance of group from POA. Using that, they can send me another front sight.
I also discussed the fact that the front sight they sent has two holes, whereas there is only one in the barrel. After making a rather disparaging remark about Marlin's tendency for lack of consistency in that regard, and how difficult it makes life for after-market manufacturers, he said, "we do make a front sight that has only one hole that
should work for you".
Hmm. The "should" part raised my eyebrow after I hung up. (Didn't think quickly enough.)
I'm wondering if I should just get a new sight that will definitely work for getting the rifle sighted in properly, then have my smith drill and tap another hole for it if that front sight is a two-holer? For security of attachment, isn't two holes better than one?
Any thoughts?
Nem