A soberingly good answer (already established myself as a smartass, but this would be an intelligent answer): "All citizens have a social duty for the common peace to lend themselves to some public service towards that goal. Some feel it is enough to pay taxes and rely on only the occasional presence of the police to keep them safe. Other citizens take a more pro-active service, and do not leave their safety totally in the hands of others. I am one of those. I bear a firearm, and I also bear the responsibility of being competent and safe with it. A peacefully intent, armed citizen is an asset to society, not a threat. As you know, the police are not always in the right place at the right time. I may be in the place they are not, at the right time. My being armed does not encroach on your freedom or safety, it only enhances it. Give me the same respect I give you at your choice to go unarmed with my choice to go armed. By being unarmed, you place more of the social responsibility of safety on me, but I do not think less of you for it. I respect your choice."