The Caliber Wars! Myths Vs. Reality.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not related to momentum. In hunting we actualy have a mesurment of impact, it is a multiple of frontal area (before expansion) and velocity. This is somewhat related to TWC but since that relies alot on bullet construction they are not directly related.
The 40 "hits" a tad harder then 9mm +P and 45 ACP with regular weight bullets, this is visable in the TWC which can reach 72 cu inches with the 135gr bullets and 47 cu in with the 155s, both more then comprabale 9mms and 45s. Agian not saying the TWC is the vital messurment of terminal performance, but it certainly does not hurt terminal performance either, especaly when you can get good figures for both TWC and PWC with adaquate penatration.
I know the new 45s can be had with nice high cap mags, but they tend to be a bit bulky for my small hands, if that were not the case I might perfer the large framed 45s (or 10mm :D ) over the 40s they are both solid performers.
 
Last edited:
a mesurment of impact, it is a multiple of frontal area (before expansion) and velocity. This is somewhat related to TWC but since that relies alot on bullet construction they are not directly related.
I appreciate your clarification. It seems to me, however, that a bullet with a larger meplat should get credit for being "harder hitting" than a pointier bullet of the same caliber; but that escapes the calculation as given.

I would point out that under such a definition, a 90 gr 9mm+P at 1500fps hits harder than a 147 @ 1000; in fact it "hits harder" that a .40 @ 1000!

So, let's see: we have energy, momentum, Taylor KO, sectional density, and sectional momentum to consider when selecting ammo...and now we can add "impact." And yet they all seem to be different ways of getting at TWC or PWC.

If we could only come up with a "bullet construction index," we'd be all set!

But again, the proper mix of capacity, PWC, and TWC (related, as you said, to impact) seems to be a subjective matter. The only objective standard is penetration...

Which is as objective as an agency's subjective recommendation can be!

And somewhere, as we all agree placement is king, we'll have to find a place for shootability.
 
Yes you are correct, all other factors being the same a large meplet bullet will "hit" harder then a spritzer, but if you think of the multi dimensional calculus/trig needed to factor in the shape of the nose of the the bullet into that you would understand why we omit that LOL. Impact like TWC is a secondary factor in terminal ballistics, when you boil it all down PWC is king, because a PCP crazed attacker probably won't feel your "hydrostatic shock", but a rapid loss of blood pressure will buckle his knees as quick as anyone. The brain needs oxygen to function no matter what drug you are on.
 
Lets for the sake of argument say that the difference in effects on soft targets of the .357 and .45 is a wash.

Now lets look at the other benefits and disadvantages of both cartridges:

--------------.357sig------.45acp
penetration -----13"---------13"---------------- Both are acceptable.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Mag capacity---15/17 -------13------------------Full size glock mags.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Recoil--------.357 sig has similar recoil force, but is faster than .45. Both are less than .40
------------- (according to all data I can find online)
................................formula for momentum applies here (M*V, 124gr*1450fps = 25.9lbs, 230gr *900fps = 26.3lbs, 165gr* 1150fps = 27.1lbs)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Intermediate barrier penetration:
---------------- .357 sig known to penetrate level II vests, and car doors effectively, with energy left over to neutralize target on other side.
-------------------------------------.45 stopped by level IIA body armor. (lowest NIJ level) (http://www.justnet.org/pages/BallisticCPL.aspx)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Cost:--------$23.50 per50,-----$17.50 per 50 -------------(bulkammo.com)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
special features:----.357 barrel interchangeable with .40 s&w barrels allowing for cheaper practice rounds and ability to be suppressed more effectively.

-------------------------------.45 is subsonic allowing for a more effectively suppressed round.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Range:--------------because the .357 much faster than the .45, its parabolic curve is much straighter and you can shoot effectively at much larger distance of the .45's effective range. That is assuming the shooters marksmanship ability is at that level.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Negatives:---------.357 is a LOUD round compared to .45
------------------------------ .45s are physically heavy compared to .357
_____________________________________________________________________________________________


My conclusion: Both rounds, being the same effectiveness on soft targets, have advantages and dis advantages. If you want to go with the .45, it's a fine choice. I will not give anyone a hard time for choosing it. It has been proven for over 100 years. It has advantages over the .357 that are useful. However, the .357 sig, based on the .357 magnum round, has also been proven. the Auto is a new technology, but its benefits are clear. The ability to carry a larger capacity of rounds, it intermediate barrier penetration, and the ability to swap barrels to use another caliber entirely make this round an excellent choice as well. To say that it is ineffective compared to a .45, or even in the same league as a 9mm Parabellum is a false statement. If you don't like the round, for some personal reason, don't get it. But if someone chooses it, don't try to convince them they are wrong because you will get into a long roundabout argument that will go nowhere fast, and the result will be that both of you hate eachother over something as petty as caliber choice.

I think the most important thing, ( AND MY NUMBER ONE POINT for starting this thread) is that each person is comfortable and confident in their chosen weapon system. No one should have any delusions about what they are doing. No pistol round is a guaranteed 1 shot stop, nor is any pistol round plainly ineffective. practice what you think works for you. And remember that any bullet can kill YOU.
 
Last edited:
Well this changes things, it has been in effect for a while now but I just found out. Sales of EAs high performance 5.7x28 ammunition has been restricted to LE only! This includes the BT and S4 loads that everyone has been all hopped up about. So everyone not in LE will be limited to those wimpy 195s 197s and the like. That means that your $1,000 five and seven will be limited to 22 rimfire performance with factory ammo. I think it is safe to say that nobody here would disagree that the 9mm +P is VASTLY more effective then 22 rimfire mag level performance, or do you need me to break down those numbers too? :D
 
I don't think I have ever seen somebody as angry at a single platform as I have seen Kachum. It is almost like he is possessed. Or should I say obsessed?

I think this says it all...

Even though the guys in the five and seven forums say they are not getting the advertised 2600 fps...

You will side-step facts, cherry-pick results, and obfuscate scientific results in hopes of supporting your agenda yet you hang out in a forum named after the very platform you despise? Whoa.. this has pathology written all over it.

You are completely confused as to how the 5.7x28mm round works. You compare sectional densities to a primitive round that has a completely different behavior. That would be akin to comparing a cannonball to a sidewinder missile. Did you stop to consider that the 5.7mm round was designed to have a small sectional density so it can penetrate hard barriers and armor? :scrutiny: Then, after it penetrates said hard barriers it turns sideways and tears tissue via tumbling? Some 5.7mm designs have actually tested as staying vertical after entering gel for 80% of their entire penetration depth.

You use terms like magic and voodoo to describe the properties of how the 5.7mm gets the job done. Well, that is not unlike how early civilizations described new technology that they either could not understand or couldn't accept. They called it magic and usually persecuted those that accepted it (sound familiar?). Today we understand "magic" to just be technology, yet in this thread there is still evidence of very primitive thinking.

But don't be dismayed, there are others in the ballistics world who have been similarly confused (and defiant) by the technology inherent in a "smart bullet" like the 5.7mm. Fackler would be one such example..

When the US Secret Service decided to adopt the P90 as their primary sub-machine gun, Fackler told the Secret Service before they conducted their tests that the "system is ineffective". The James J. Reilly Secret Service Testing Facility had this to say in response: "While we respect Dr. Fackler's opinion, we have found this system to be extremely effective and we feel confident adopting it. Our testing concludes that the 5.7x28mm system supports all claims made by Fabrique Nationale concerning its effectiveness".

Dude, you need to just step back from the forum for a while, hug your 9mm, and let this issue die. You will live a happier life because of it. As far as someone believing your blather, good luck. Most are probably just laughing at you. I know the officer's that have used this round in the line of duty would be...
 
Not related to momentum. In hunting we actualy have a mesurment of impact, it is a multiple of frontal area (before expansion) and velocity. This is somewhat related to TWC but since that relies alot on bullet construction they are not directly related.
The 40 "hits" a tad harder then 9mm +P and 45 ACP with regular weight bullets, this is visable in the TWC which can reach 72 cu inches with the 135gr bullets and 47 cu in with the 155s, both more then comprabale 9mms and 45s. Agian not saying the TWC is the vital messurment of terminal performance, but it certainly does not hurt terminal performance either, especaly when you can get good figures for both TWC and PWC with adaquate penatration.
I know the new 45s can be had with nice high cap mags, but they tend to be a bit bulky for my small hands, if that were not the case I might perfer the large framed 45s (or 10mm :D ) over the 40s they are both solid performers.
I'm glad to see you're easing up a bit on your criticism of TWC. I know we'll never come to an equal agreement on how effective or important TWC is on a target, but at least you'll admit it does have some bearing on the terminal performance of the round. Thats all I was going for.

I'm sorry if you felt I was ever being unreasonably rude at any point in my posts. I don't like feeling like a ass hole. I just want to debate things with an open mindedness, and some level of civility.

I respect your opinion, and I hope we can get past any hard feelings attained in this string.
 
Is it safe to say that we all agree that permanent cavity is the actual permanent wounding/incapacitation mechanism, and that temporary cavity in gelatin is not representative of performance in the heterogeneous environment of the human chest cavity?
 
First the low SD does not penatrate kevlar the speed does, specilty light ultra fast 9mm loads do that as well.
Staying vertical through 80% of the wound canal, oh please I will beleve that when I see it, I am very well versed in tumbeling bullets, I was in the US Army remember, I have even seen the result of them hitting soft tissue in person, not something that I care to see again to be honest :barf:
Cherry picked my @$$ you are the ones that insist on using a LE only round for comparison, and even doing that the over the counter 9mm came out on top in every catagory.
Sure the P90 is effective, especaly with full power loads on full auto, the SS uses them for good reason, and I am not even dabating that.
I don't currently own a 9mm so it would be hard to hug one. I am more of a .40 S&W guy.
Laughing at ME, you are the one that has FAILED on many occasions to provide any studie or documantaion to support your standing, and I have done so many times now. You cannot even bring yourself to anwser the questions that I have asked. I almost feel sorry for you.
 
Is it safe to say that we all agree that permanent cavity is the actual permanent wounding/incapacitation mechanism, and that temporary cavity in gelatin is not representative of performance in the heterogeneous environment of the human chest cavity?
I'll agree with you that what is left over of the damage after the initial impact is what determines a round's effectiveness. This being said, a larger TWC causes more total damage to be left over, and it's debatable as to weather this extra damage (which is smaller than the size of the TWC, but larger than the size of the bullet itself) can be considered part of the PWC or not. If you are including it in the PWC than I agree with you completely. However, if you are discounting it from the PWC, and only including the tissue that the bullet itself has touched, then I disagree. I think it's time once and for all to define what the PWC is. We all understand the TWC, but lets see what everyone's definition of the PWC is.

Is it,
A. The amount of actual tissue damage left over, including both the cracks and severed tissue up to 3 inches around the path of the bullet?
B. The tissue physically ripped and torn by touching the bullet itself only, not including any of the stressed tissue touched only by the energetic forces deposited by the round striking the soft target.
 
First the low SD does not penatrate kevlar the speed does, specilty light ultra fast 9mm loads do that as well.
I disagree with you on this one. The specialty 9mm ammo designed for armor penetration has a solid and pointed smaller penetrator projectile encased in the bullet itself. The sectional density is the primary method of armor penetration. It divides a larger force over a smaller area, increasing the pressure on a smaller number of kevlar fibres. Thinner projectiles always have better penetration through armor. Some .22s have been known to penetrate barriers that stopped 9mm.
 
Last edited:
Well this changes things, it has been in effect for a while now but I just found out. Sales of EAs high performance 5.7x28 ammunition has been restricted to LE only! This includes the BT and S4 loads that everyone has been all hopped up about. So everyone not in LE will be limited to those wimpy 195s 197s and the like. That means that your $1,000 five and seven will be limited to 22 rimfire performance with factory ammo. I think it is safe to say that nobody here would disagree that the 9mm +P is VASTLY more effective then 22 rimfire mag level performance, or do you need me to break down those numbers too? :D

OMG... you just need to just stop. :uhoh:

For anybody that is still listening to this guy's comments; let me assure you that all current EA ammunition is still available to the public. 'Chum is very, very confused (color me surprised) and perhaps ill.

FiveseveN owners still have 11 lovely lines of ammunition available from Elite Ammunition and all of them outperform FN's factory ammunition by significant margins. There are other small ammo manufacturers like Clark's Custom Cartridge that will load ANY .223 bullet into 5.7x28mm brass for you at the speed you request. You can also buy SS190 AP through gunbroker.com. None of the aforementioned rounds are illegal to purchase or own for the FiveseveN as per the B.A.T.F and many will penetrate more than 48 layers of Kevlar.

FiveseveN friends, FN's watered down SS197 and SS195 have taken down 250lb deer as well as hog, so if you currently carry those rounds have no doubt that they will take down a two-legged (un-armored) human as well with well-placed shots (like any other primitive caliber).

Here are some SS197 (varmint round?) victims:

newimageiw.jpg


2010-12-02_12-47-12_153.jpg

boar5728rc.jpg

DSC00551.jpg
 
Is that really suposed to impress me, shooting them behing the ear is nothing, I saw a mature hog killed by an pellet rifle yesterday with that shot placement. I have seen a 9mm shot through the boiler room kill them as well. Please dude your arguments are old and busted many times before. Same ole same ole. ;) My point stands yet unchallenged that the 5.7 pistol will not do anything that a modern 9mm cannot do just as well if not better. That stood the test against the high power LE only ammo and I assure you the less potent stuff would be no challange.
If I am the one confused then why on earth will nobody on your side of the argument anwser simple questions much less provide proof of their claims?
 
Last edited:
I'm quoting this because it invalidates anything else you have to say. Forever.

Whoops.. typo! I guess I was thinking about low resistance when I was typing and inserted that word instead of high. High-sectional density.

I didn't realize a simple quotation of one's typo can invalidate anything else someone has to say. Will that work with 'Chum? That's powerfullllll!!1111 :rolleyes:
 
Claims made and still unproven by the 5.7 crowd
Energy/momentum/caliber all mean nothing....Right :scrutiny:
TWC is directly proportionate to PWC..........LOL :D
The TWC and PWC of the 5.7 is greater then any 9mm....Really what test results are you quoting? :confused:
Do you see why I am just a little skeptical of your outragous claims? Show me facts to support all of this and I will leave you alone and forget all about your personal insults and outright lies to try and discredit me.
Low SD does not improve penatration at any given speed, it reduces it actualy, but for a given energy level often the faster, lighter, lower SD bullet will punch through kevlar better. Look it up yourself, I am not making that up. When the M1 tanks want to punch a hole through another tank, they don't use a low SD projectile, they have a 120mm discarding sabot propeling a javlin like ultra high SD DU projectile at near 5000fps, high SD and speed beats speed alone. This is a well established fact and I would challange you to actualy read up on this. My credibility is quite intact thank you :D
 
Last edited:
My point stands yet unchallenged that the 5.7 pistol will not do anything that a modern 9mm cannot do just as well if not better.

lololololololol You make this too easy.

The FiveseveN pistol is:

1) Lighter than an empty Glock when FULLY LOADED with 21 rounds.

2) Is shorter than ANY 9mm pistol when carrying 31 rounds.

3) Shoots civilian-legal ammo that penetrates Level IIIa armor.

4) Enjoys rifle velocities out of a 4.75" barrel (S4M/S4 Ultra Raptor) 2,600FPS

5) Is unbelievably flat-shooting allowing accuracy that is unheard of in other platforms.

6) Has minimal recoil allowing ultra-fast follow up shots from less-than-expert shooters.

Just stop man... seriously.. lol
 
1 I don't shoot glocks, too bulky.
2 Who carries 31 round mags for self defence? And a 4" barrel is shorter then a 4.8" barrel last I checked.
3 I could handload 9mm to punch through lvIII armor if I wanted to. But why?
4 your S4s are LE only and even the guys on the five and seven forum are griping that they don't get the 2600fps
5 Avrage gun fight happens within seven feet, what does trajectory have to do with self defence? A 9mm shoots plenty flat to 50 yards how much further do you need?
6 The "recoil" on a 9mm even a featherweight is a joke, it is hardly noticable.

Oh just in case you did not beleve me about the ultra high SD penatrators here is a pic, ask any tanker what they do. Now eat those words :D
BTW there is a little 9mm round called the 7N31 that not only defeats LvIII body armor but also 8mm thick steel plates, something that the AP 5.7x28 cannot do (it is listed as 3/16" steel penatration). And it does it with a higher SD 115gr bullet. Realy is there any doubt left that the century old 9mm is every bit as effective as any newfangle 5.7mm?
 

Attachments

  • Sabot.jpg
    Sabot.jpg
    6.7 KB · Views: 5
Last edited:
He is not worth it. I rather just smash him on here, they still has provided no proof whatsoever of their outragous claims, I have asked over and over again, and nobody on that end seems to know what they are talking about.
 
A. The amount of actual tissue damage left over, including both the cracks and severed tissue up to 3 inches around the path of the bullet?
B. The tissue physically ripped and torn by touching the bullet itself only, not including any of the stressed tissue touched only by the energetic forces deposited by the round striking the soft target.

Does scenario A actually happen if the TWC is not fast enough to provide that kind of damage? I'd like to see the source that Scenario A happens with a 9mm round. Because I'd agree that scenario A is the case, assuming the damage is sufficient to increase the rate at which blood pressure is lost. If it's just a bruise, like what everything I've read will say at pistol (non-PDW) calibers, then scenario B is true.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top