Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

The correct spelling is 'ordinance', is it not?

Discussion in 'Legal' started by zahc, Oct 31, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. zahc

    zahc Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2003
    Messages:
    1,961
    Location:
    TX
    I deliver pizza and as such get to see a lot of the 'no guns' signs on business doors here in Ohio.

    One such flavor I assume the state sells or gives out because it's official looking and everybody has the same one, including the police station and state hospital. It says '...weapon or deadly ordnance..'.

    Close enough for government work eh?

    Btw I wouldn't be able to carry at my job anyway as the car carry thing is about impossible, and I'm under 21. I need to move to a free state.
     
  2. Silver Bullet

    Silver Bullet Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,335
    Location:
    Arizona
    Depends on what they're trying to say. Roughly, "ordinance" is a law; "ordnance" is ammunition.

    From the context, I'd say they meant "ordnance", as they spelled it. However, "ordinance" would be much funnier when you realize that gun control laws make things more, not less, dangerous.
     
  3. DMF

    DMF Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    2,247
    Location:
    Nomad
  4. AZRickD

    AZRickD Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2003
    Messages:
    1,684
    While usage varies a bit, ordnance is considered heavier weaponry and kabooms.

    There is a difference between "Arms" and "Ordnance." So when the anti-gunner tries to make the argument that the 2nd Amendment is out of step because nobody should have a nuclear weapon (nuclear "arms") you might suggest to him/her that a nuclear weapons is considered to be ordnance not common arms of the soldier and the Founders knew the difference. That being said, the Founds had no problem with private ships being armed with cannon, and many folks had a pair of functional cannon on their property, and they weren't just lawn ornaments.

    Rick
     
  5. SMMAssociates

    SMMAssociates Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    950
    Location:
    Youngstown, OH
    Zahc:

    There's no standard at all for the signs. The A/G's web site has a "suggested" sample that is likely what you've been seeing.

    Hopefully, by the time you're old enough the vehicular carry issues will be resolved. :fire:
     
  6. repsychler

    repsychler Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2003
    Messages:
    361
    Location:
    Garland, TX
    Hand grenades are deadly ordnance.
    Anti-gun laws are deadly ordinance.
    ;)

    The sign is correct.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page