The following is from Massad's subscription emails

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm sure my position won't be very popular on here, but que sera, sera.

It may not be. However, I work with a police force full time, (not a LEO) and I agree with you 100%. Things have gotten to the point that it is more about justifying budgets and curing irational fears than ending crime.

There was a war on crime declared years ago. What we ended up with was a war on freedom to ensure safety for those that refuse to take responsibility for their own life.
 
The bad guys always have the initiative.
Unless their "mission planning" is conducted via easily intercepted
communications, no one will know until the incident itself
begins to unfold.
Alert, armed and trained citizens probably won't deter such evil,
but will help mitigate the damage.

Budget cuts are happening all around, and you could argue:
"In an age of globally competitive knowledge work, we're cutting school
budgets and falling behind other countries."
"In an age in which our media landscape has become a cultural wasteland,
we're cutting funding for the fine arts."
"In an age of severe weather, we're cutting funding for warning
sytems, levee building and wildfire fighting."
And so on.
You can argue for or against any spending priority, but it seems as if
we've grown accustomed to asking our governments at every level
to do too much, for too long. Something has to give, and it's probably
best if every sector feel the pain of the fiscal scalpel.
 
If it happens, I predict it will happen in Chicago:

1. Corrupt, ineffective city government.
2. Corrupt, ineffective police force.
3. Rampant racial, ethnic and religious hatred.
4. Dozens of highly concentrated, high value targets.
5. Easy routes of access and escape from innumerable directions.
6. An existing base of religious and political extremists.
7. Multiple first tier media outlets to spread panic.

Something to think about:

As I recall, last year there were MULTIPLE thefts of lightbars from police vehicle facilities. A young boy was able to impersonate a police officer and enter "secure" police facilities on MULTIPLE occasions. There may have been uniform thefts as well.

All it would take would be for "police" to show up at a crowded public venue favored by a particular demographic, and to open fire while hurling the appropriate slurs... followed by attacks on the real police when they respond... followed by the real police firing on each other... followed by a political firestorm and witchhunt. It'd make Katrina look like a Morris dancing festival in Newfoundland.

I can't imagine why it hasn't already happened, apart from apparent serious damage to the command and control structure of the various Islamist terrorist groups inflicted by the last two presidential administrations.
 
But, read some of the commentary that followed that last blog! Because the politician appointed to head Homeland Security hints that gun owners might be suspect, you should hate the police officer who patrols your neighborhood?

Hate them? No. There's no reason to ever trust them though. 99% would start confiscating guns tomorrow if ordered. After all they don't want to lose their job.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top