Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

The Hughes Amendment gone? (what if)

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by Blakenzy, Nov 22, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Blakenzy

    Blakenzy Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2004
    Messages:
    904
    If the evil aberration called the Hughes Amendment of the 1986 FOPA is discarded, what will happen to MG availability and prices? Will the ATF attempt to jack up the NFA tax? Will every old gunshop carry firearms with happy switches? How common will FA get? Would a FA AR15 cost the same as current SA versions? What about an M249, M240 or other currently manufactured belt fed? What are your dreams and aspirations should this ever happen?
     
  2. ants

    ants Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2007
    Messages:
    3,551
    The ATF (Dept of Treasury) does not have authority to establish, increase nor decrease a federal tax, only to establish policy in collecting the tax. Congress does have taxation authority. It would be likely that the tax would be increased dramatically by a Democratic congress.

    If you think for a minute that the gun industry (including manufacturers, distributors and retailers) will gladly and willingly reduce a $15,000 gun to just $900 or so, think again.

    However, the aftermarket parts industry may be very innovative in finding ways to exploit the new circumstance to provide conversion kits at rock bottom prices, making up for it in volume.
     
  3. pharmer

    pharmer Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2004
    Messages:
    805
    Location:
    Santo las Nubes, Fl
    Put down the bong, ain't gonna happen. We are headed for another "dark age" 2A wise. Joe
     
  4. 22-rimfire

    22-rimfire Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2005
    Messages:
    11,380
    Location:
    TN
    Maybe you should summarize what the Hughes Amendment of 1986 actually did?
     
  5. Blakenzy

    Blakenzy Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2004
    Messages:
    904
    It's a "what if" question. I am not implying that it will happen, I just want to know what people think it would be like.
     
  6. Yellowfin

    Yellowfin Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Messages:
    289
    Location:
    Painted Post, NY
    I think you'd see a lot of AR's and AK's with happy switches, dunno about what else. As for prices, I gather that pre 86 the prices weren't that much higher than the regular semis, like maybe a few hundred extra rather than a thousand or more. Dunno how many people would know that NFA items are legal or where to get them. Class 3 dealers are a tiny fraction of all FFL's. My dad didn't know suppressors were legal to obtain by average folks until recently.


    As for myself, I'd like to see suppressors taken off the NFA list first. That's a product more people need.
     
  7. Blakenzy

    Blakenzy Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2004
    Messages:
    904
    In 1986 the gun rights movement lobbied Congress to pass the Firearm Owners' Protection Act(FOPA) to prevent the abuse of regulatory power by organizations such as the ATF, particularly concerning inspections and harrasment of FFL dealers. Before it was passed Rep. Hughes of NJ attached a parasitic amendment that would prohibit civilians from owning or transfering automatic firearms that were not registered prior to May, 1986, thus screwing us with something that was meant to protect us (ironic, huh?).

    So every automatic firearm made after that date, or otherwise not registered by that date was suddenly "illegal" for civilians.
     
  8. cuervo

    cuervo Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2005
    Messages:
    816
    That is the one that closed the machine gun list for any new additions. Basically, it made any machine gun made after 1986 for dealer or LE use only--it could not be transferred to a mere peon of a US citizen.

    If it were repealed, prices would come down as they did for magazines after 2004, but I don't think there would be a dramatic jump in ownership. You would still have to have the background check and $200 tax and find a dealer that is licensed for full auto.

    I would think there is a better chance of a case going to the court that says the $200 tax has always been illegal on machine guns since the 1939 court case addressed it only on short barreled shotguns (but still an illegal tax IMO).
     
  9. 7.62X25mm

    7.62X25mm member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    313
    I second that emotion --

    Having just sorted out "EBR", now I'm wondering about:

    FOPA

    MGA

    M240, M249 (they're guns)

    I got NA, FA, NFA . . . but maybe some others did not.

    I just Googled "certiorari" and what it takes to get an AWB reviewed by SCOTUS. (Or is that too many acronyms some more?)
     
  10. 7.62X25mm

    7.62X25mm member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    313
    -- "don't Bogart that bong, my friend, pass it over to me . . . " You're drinkin' the bong water, aren't cha?


    :D
     
  11. cuervo

    cuervo Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2005
    Messages:
    816
    I said "better" chance, but I agree it's still probably a snowball's chance...
     
  12. Yellowfin

    Yellowfin Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Messages:
    289
    Location:
    Painted Post, NY
    It sure as heck didn't work for California. The local anti gun gestapo here will count the hairs on your head daily and make sure they're all in the same sequence if you're an FFL. Guys I know here that work in shops spend at least half their day filling out paperwork and nothing but paperwork.
     
  13. NCCCW

    NCCCW Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1

    The ATF is no longer under the Dept. of Treasury, it was moved to Dept. of Justice. This troubles me since Obama picked anti 2A Eric Holder as his Attorney General.
     
  14. Gunnerpalace

    Gunnerpalace Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2007
    Messages:
    2,092
    Location:
    Somewhere in Michigan
    Fleming will,

    Auto Ordinance might,

    Bushmaster Maybe,

    You ask Charles Daly they are a manufacturer and post here, I made a list a while ago I will try to find it.
     
  15. 22-rimfire

    22-rimfire Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2005
    Messages:
    11,380
    Location:
    TN
    Thank you for summarizing the act. I didn't know the name of the act that allowed for registration of fully automatic weapons to be grandfathered.
     
  16. DoubleTapDrew

    DoubleTapDrew Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2006
    Messages:
    5,356
    Location:
    Oregon
    FOPA: Firearms Owners Protection Act (1986). Mostly a good act removing some restrictions, but as mentioned, hughes slipped that poison pill in.
    MGA: That one's new to me
    M240: Belt fed .308 made by FN, to replace the M60, usually mounted to a vehicle. M249: Belt fed .223, also to replace the M60 as a squad automatic weapon (most commonly referred to as a SAW), but in an anemic caliber IMHO (In my humble opinion)

    If the Hughes act was discarded, and I certainly think it's totally unconstitutional and should be, it would be possible for MG prices to get down close to those of semi-auto prices, if not match them. They don't cost more to make. Would the tax be raised by congress? Possibly, although the RKBA movement (HOPEFULLY with the help of the NRA's muscle) would then bring it into the media and show how ridiculous the restrictions are, not to mention the absurd 100% taxes on things like suppressors or SBRs/SBSs.
    If they chose to keep it hushed and hope nobody in the media found out then they might leave the tax alone. I'd like to think they would because they'd have a lot of questions to answer about how restrictive things are to the point of being absurd.
    Would the media scream about blood in the streets and how every school teacher is now packing a real AK? Possibly, except they'd have to face two very powerful facts that will shut them up real quick:
    1. They are already legal. Yes Mr. Reporter you heard that right, they are and have been legal since they were invented (in sane locales). The only thing that changes is the cost of guns due to the artificial demand placed on the supply that the government caused. People have to still go through ATF/FBI background checks and procedures, nothing changes except for the number of zeros on their check.
    2. NFA owners are the most law abiding folks out there. If you really want to slam their face in the mud, compare the record of NFA owners to those of reporters, senators, heck, presidents.
    Bringing this stuff public would also bring the opportunity to educate the public that full auto guns aren't "more deadly" than the semi-auto versions. You don't mow down legions of people like in the movies, and in fact in most cases unless you are trained with a full auto chances are you'll get less rounds on target than you would with a semi-auto. Katie Kouric can demonstrate.
     
  17. Conqueror

    Conqueror Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Messages:
    966
    Location:
    RTP, NC
    That's a really silly thing to say. No manufacturer, distributor, or retailer is getting $15,000 for a machine gun. The ones that cost that much are the ones in private hands that are civilian-legal. The proceeds for selling those just go to the previous owner, not the gun industry. The manufacturers can only sell to the government, which can buy new machine guns. A bushmaster M16 costs about $1,000 to the police, just as it did for civilians before the Hughes Amendment.
     
  18. Prince Yamato

    Prince Yamato Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2006
    Messages:
    4,410
    Location:
    Texas
    Yeah, but if you had the option of a $1200 AR and a $1400 ($1200 + $200 tax) M16, which would you get? I'd get the M16. Everyone assumes because you have a select-fire gun that you'll only shoot it full auto. The advantage to select-fire is that you can shoot it in semi-auto too. So, for most people, a range session would probably be a couple magazines worth on semi and then a mag dump on full auto at the end. Not every day would be Knob Creek.

    Consider also that there would probably be an influx of auto-sears at the $100 price range, so basically $300 to convert your semi into a full auto. I think the market for machineguns is there. A boom in the machinegun market would also increase the profits for the reloading industry. Don't forget that gun ranges would make a killing as EVERYONE would want to try a machinegun "just once".
     
  19. ServiceSoon

    ServiceSoon Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,404
    Location:
    Michiana
    I agree! Why were sound suppressors ever regulated in the first place?
     
  20. Conqueror

    Conqueror Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Messages:
    966
    Location:
    RTP, NC
    They were regulated because the Wildlife Service lobbied Congress to include them. The NFA is a Great Depression-era law and they were worried that poor civilians would use silencers to poach game animals out of season to put meat on the table.
     
  21. PTK

    PTK Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2007
    Messages:
    3,712
    Location:
    Montana
    Since that $15,000 gun cost them $14,500, and the $900 gun would cost them $700 but they'd sell dozens instead of just the one.... I think you're wrong. And I've talked to quite a few C3 dealers. :)

    Conqueror has it right.

    As for Bushmaster/DPMS/Colt.... well, they have no issues selling repair parts for existing MGs, so they'd probably be fine selling new MGs legally. Other companies I can think of that would be happy to sell civilians MGs/conversion parts: FNH, Glock, HiPoint (laugh all you want, a 10rd 9mm carbine with a FA setting would be dang useful at $300 plus $200 tax!), and basically ALL NFA SOT manufacturers would be happy to churn out $300-$500 open bolt SMGs all day. :)


    I sure do. NFA items are in higher demand nowadays than I've ever seen before - and others have seen the same trend. LOTS of folks are getting into NFA items for the first time, many being silencers or SBRs. Lots of people I've talked to would happily put down $1k or less on a simple MG like a STEN or a drop in conversion for a Glock or AR-15. The law is preventing the manufacture and distribution of a desired good.
     
  22. ants

    ants Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2007
    Messages:
    3,551
    Very interesting. Is there a source where I can read more about this? We would hate to find that it's another campfire tale.

    [It must have been east coast wildlife rangers. It's actually humorous to those of us who live out west, where no one is within miles of the poacher's location so the shot isn't heard, especially in 1934. We still have poaching today, but rarely does anyone hear a gunshot way out in the boonies.]
     
  23. ServiceSoon

    ServiceSoon Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,404
    Location:
    Michiana
    That doesn't make sense. They would rather poor people starve to death or require government assistance to live? That is just going to create a class of people who require gov assistance for a few generations. Also, how could you consider it poaching if a family is killing an animal so that they can live? Seems cruel and inhuman to require them to get a permit so they can eat.
     
  24. Prince Yamato

    Prince Yamato Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2006
    Messages:
    4,410
    Location:
    Texas
    The silencer story is true. I believe Wyoming or some western state has a law on the books from those years making it illegal to hunt with a silencer for those very same reasons. The NFA just reinforced it.
     
  25. hankdatank1362

    hankdatank1362 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2006
    Messages:
    2,378
    Location:
    Myrtle Beach
    Nevermind, Conqueror beat me to it.

    The prices have been artificially inflated due to the closing of the registry; the gun industry has nothing to do with that.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page