Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

the major ar-15 receiver makers fyi

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by dprice3844444, Apr 27, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. dprice3844444

    dprice3844444 member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Messages:
    4,264
    Location:
    se fla i love claymores 01/sot
  2. Robert

    Robert Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2006
    Messages:
    10,055
    Location:
    Texan by birth, in Colorado cause I hate humidity
    What follows the link is a comparison of manufacturer products for AR receivers. Next time please include a brief explanation of the link or it will be locked/ deleted.
     
  3. JustinJ

    JustinJ Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Messages:
    4,046
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Maybe i missed it by it doesnt say anywhere how he knows the claims of who makes whose receivers to be true?
     
  4. proven

    proven Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2004
    Messages:
    771
    Location:
    VT
    it should probably be noted that the original post was from 2007. some companies have probably changed who they contract with and there are likely other players now as well.
     
  5. Robert

    Robert Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2006
    Messages:
    10,055
    Location:
    Texan by birth, in Colorado cause I hate humidity
    Well there you go. Take it with a grain of salt. Still looks to be some decent information but you are correct, lots can change in 5 years.
     
  6. mshootnit

    mshootnit Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2007
    Messages:
    2,016
    the title of the thread as I read it described the link fairly well. Of course I am not a moderator but I see no foul. I am glad it was not blocked or deleted because it was a valuable link in terms of info for me
     
  7. taliv

    taliv Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2004
    Messages:
    22,063
    i think Robert was trying to say we generally prefer a bit more information so readers will know what they're getting before they click a link that redirects them off site.

    no big deal.
     
  8. 68wj

    68wj Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2010
    Messages:
    1,654
    Location:
    Upstate
    Be sure to vote in the USA Today 2nd amendment poll too. :neener:

    The quality, price, and availability of receivers today is very nice.
     
  9. CharlieDeltaJuliet

    CharlieDeltaJuliet Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2012
    Messages:
    1,456
    Location:
    North Carolinian
    S&W now does all in house, they were previously manufactured by who ever made Stag Arms. I read a big write up in the AR Guide about S&W buying all the equipment to produce their AR from start to finish. This all started when they began with the melonite and the Sport model.
     
  10. dprice3844444

    dprice3844444 member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Messages:
    4,264
    Location:
    se fla i love claymores 01/sot
    brief explanation like what?
     
  11. WNTFW

    WNTFW Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,906
    FWIW
    I see a fair amount of lowers. One thing I have noticed is an inconsistency depending on when a lower (of a given manufacturer) was manufactured. The 2 main areas are anodizing varies in appearance and the seams along the centerline in front of the magwell.
     
  12. madcratebuilder

    madcratebuilder Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2007
    Messages:
    5,020
    Location:
    Northern Orygun
    The info in that link is extremely dated and incorrect. If you have a older AR it's good for ID'ing but not for any current production rifles.
     
  13. Robert

    Robert Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2006
    Messages:
    10,055
    Location:
    Texan by birth, in Colorado cause I hate humidity
    That is what I was trying to get at. Sorry I was not more clear.

    Knowing that it might be a rather large task would you be willing to point out and refute the incorrect material? I think it would be of great value to the members of THR.
     
    Last edited: Apr 28, 2012
  14. Tirod

    Tirod Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2008
    Messages:
    4,316
    Location:
    SW MO
    If there's a point to it all, the link isn't that valuable anymore, and those interested in the AR would be better served ignoring it, and researching what is on the market now. The OP hasn't done anyone any favors, any more than a car dealer handing you an five year old sales brochure for the Mustangs on the lot.

    The colors offered won't even be the same.

    Posting up another list, however well researched, would just be another snapshot of the market. It doesn't really tell someone what they need to know - which is that they should spec the rifle to support what range and target they have to shoot. Not what parts are more cool than the other.

    As far a lowers on the market these days they are mostly a commodity, made by a few and machined by a few others, with everyone's art work on the magwell. Pick the one you like and can afford, move on. A $100 difference in price can't be seen in accuracy or reliability - it's the barrel and upper that do that. All a lower does is hold the trigger parts and a magazine while attaching the upper to the buttstock. It could be fiberglass reinforced nylon and get the job done.

    Which is why FN, Beretta, and Remington use it on their new battle carbines. Forged aluminum is really overkill.
     
  15. dprice3844444

    dprice3844444 member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Messages:
    4,264
    Location:
    se fla i love claymores 01/sot
    forged aluminum increases the strength of the aluminum.by drop forging using a stamping die,the basic receiver is produced,less waste,and less machining is needed as compared to just a straight piece of aluminum billet.the main examples of added strength needed is the front pin holes for the front pivot pin.w/out forging,these would be a major breaking section.another stress area would be the barrel thread area,where torque could be 30-80 lbs for the barrel nut.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forging
     
    Last edited: Apr 28, 2012
  16. taliv

    taliv Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2004
    Messages:
    22,063
    tirod, i mostly agree with you, but there is some difference in lowers due to different features offered, and also the quality of the machining. for instance, i bought two lowers last year from one of the cheaper boutique mfgs and built guns on them, and it turned out they were machined pretty sloppy and the lower parts kit wouldn't work correctly. i had to modify the selector/pin to make it work. kind of a bummer. i'd have sent it back but i'd already duracoated it before assembly, so...

    anyway some do offer major features like ambi controls, and the little button that can adjust the tension between upper and lower, and some minor features like having the springs captured by set screws instead of the grip and receiver end plate. also, flared mag wells, and several other things.

    some people might want them (or think the want them) or not. would be good to know before we buy them though... a chart would be helpful
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page