Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

The "rifle after next"

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Mark Tyson, Mar 29, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Mark Tyson

    Mark Tyson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    2,523
    Location:
    Where the one eyed man is king
    Scenario:

    Say you have just been appointed to select a replacement for the M-16A2 as a service rifle for all of the armed forces. What weapon would you choose?
     
  2. Schuey2002

    Schuey2002 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    3,388
    Location:
    The Oregon Coast..
    A H&K, of course. Hehehe.

    Say it with me...Geeee thuuuurteeee siiix.:D
     
  3. Feanaro

    Feanaro Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2003
    Messages:
    2,661
    Location:
    Leeds, AL.
    How about the M16A3? Bring back full auto. :D

    Seriously, the M16A2 isn't going to be replaced anytime soon though. It works, perhaps not as well as some other rifles but it's good enough. And it would cost a lot to replace it.
     
  4. DMK

    DMK Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,797
    Location:
    Over the hills and far, far away
    AR-10.

    No retraining necessary, keep the manual of arms the same. .308 ammo is already in the supply chain.

    OK, that's solved. Next problem? Yea, about those 9mm sidearms...
     
  5. Mark Tyson

    Mark Tyson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    2,523
    Location:
    Where the one eyed man is king
    I second the motion for the AR-10! A fine weapon indeed.
     
  6. coonan357

    coonan357 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    744
    Location:
    in th peoples republic of Blagovich (sic)
    I agree , power , distance , mr stoner would be proud !!! if not that then the FN /FAL and like someone said earlier sidearms too .. umm Does 1911 ring a bell?? :rolleyes:
     
  7. cratz2

    cratz2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    4,233
    Location:
    Central IN
    M4 with a bit looser chamber for added reliability, a 16" barrel for a bit more velocity and that fires a 6x47 with a quicker burning powder to get the most out of that short 16" barrel. And since I'm calling the shots, we ditch FMJ ammo for a 75 or 80 Gr Hornady SST bullet which they haven't come out with yet but would once I offered them such a lucrative contract. ;)
     
  8. coonan357

    coonan357 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    744
    Location:
    in th peoples republic of Blagovich (sic)
    cratz , has to be fmj ( ball ) for the hauge accord .
     
  9. Marko Kloos

    Marko Kloos Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    2,587
    Location:
    Enfield, NH
    [cranky old man voice]

    By golly, I'd give our troopers an honest-to-goodness fighting rifle, the tried-and-true Springfield 1873 Trapdoor! Real fighting rounds come in .45 caliber, four-hunnert grain bullet over 70 grains of blackpowder, and that's the way we likes it!

    Them newfangled thutty-caliber bullets don't have no stopping power, and don't get me started on them twenty-twos! Twenny-two is fer shootin' chipmunks, not enemy soldiery!

    [/cranky old man voice]
     
  10. ahadams

    ahadams Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    639
    Location:
    Missouri
    lendringser - reminds me of a vet I knew in AZ who would lecture anyone who would listen (this was mid-80's, mind you) that *real* men only needed bolt action rifles to get the job done...:rolleyes:

    I second the AR-10. While as far as sidearms go I prefer the 1911A1 myself (well the Kimber version of same in any case) in order to pretend to meet Nato specs, er, I mean, in order to follow modern military practice we might need to consider a DA/SA pistol with a hammer drop safety to impress all the congressional weenies, er I mean meet congressional funding specifications...darn! I guess it's no wonder they never let me get around the visiting dignitaries when I was on active duty, eh?;)
     
  11. Jeff White

    Jeff White Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    20,649
    Location:
    Alma Illinois
    The rifle after next doesn't exist. It's in some designer's mind. When technology catches up with what the designers envision, then you'll see a new rifle, until then it's the M16 series.

    Lets face it, until we have another improvement in technology on a par with the development of smokeless powder there is no reason to change.

    Lendringser,
    You and that wimpy .45/70....Real men only needed the .75 cal Brown Bess...now there was a round...:D

    Jeff
     
  12. Blain

    Blain member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2003
    Messages:
    993
    I would demand that the M14 rifle replace the M16A2 and hire contractors to build new ones true to origonal government specs. Time to get a REAL rifle into our troops hands!
     
  13. Devonai

    Devonai Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2003
    Messages:
    3,853
    Location:
    Connecticut
    Discussed at length here.
     
  14. Feanaro

    Feanaro Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2003
    Messages:
    2,661
    Location:
    Leeds, AL.
    The M14 is sort of a waste, I think. The average trooper rarely fires beyond 300 meters, last I heard. The M16A3 can hit out to that distance and a little farther. And while some say the 308 round has more power and such, a wounded enemy ties down other people. :)
     
  15. Tamara

    Tamara Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Messages:
    9,325
    Location:
    Hoosieropolis
    Jeff White,

    I don't trust them flintlocks; suppose it don't spark? We never should've dropped matchlocks; with them, you could see the fire.

    :D
     
  16. beckrodgers

    beckrodgers Guest

    Thanks for the link to that forum,dont know when we''ll have time to visit but looks real good!
     
  17. Tamara

    Tamara Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Messages:
    9,325
    Location:
    Hoosieropolis
    Devonai,

    Going to Counterstrike sites where they attempt to have serious gun discussions just gives me headaches.

    For every one thoughtful and informed post, you have ten by folks who have never touched a real firearm.
     
  18. Redlg155

    Redlg155 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,724
    Location:
    NW Florida
    I'm thinking an AK based gas operation system shooting a hybrid 6mm round. Of course it would have a railed forward grip for all those neat items we like to hang on them.

    Good Shooting
    RED
     
  19. Devonai

    Devonai Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2003
    Messages:
    3,853
    Location:
    Connecticut
    This particular forum is less prone to that sort of nonsense by a few members such as myself who actually know what we're talking about. The thread I linked is an excellent discussion about "the rifle after next" with very little bullplop betwixt.
     
  20. Telperion

    Telperion Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2003
    Messages:
    1,482
    Location:
    Oregon
    How about a caseless ammunition system? IMO, the elimination of the cartridge case is the next great development in small arms, screw this electronic OICW nonsense. It's sad to see that after the G11 project failure, nobody has taken up further R&D.
     
  21. Thumper

    Thumper Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,904
    Location:
    Rosenberg, Texas
    What did I miss? Is the OICW off the table?

    "And ta hell with you youngsters and your new fangled shootin' irons...where'd I put my sharp rock?"
     
  22. Marko Kloos

    Marko Kloos Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    2,587
    Location:
    Enfield, NH
    The OICW was never intended as a general issue rifle replacement, but rather as an M16/M203 replacement...one OICW per fire team. The ACR program was supposed to find a replacement general issue rifle, but they dropped the ACR when neither of the candidates achieved the (unrealistic) 100% improvement in capability over the M16A2.
     
  23. ENC

    ENC Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    207
    Location:
    Grand Lake, OK
    Don't bring a gun to a "board with a nail in it" fight :D
     
  24. swingset

    swingset Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    1,477
    Location:
    Ohio
    I'd replace the M16A2 with the Sig550.

    Why? Do I need a reason?:evil:
     
  25. DMK

    DMK Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,797
    Location:
    Over the hills and far, far away
    Yea, yours. A wounded enemy may still be able to shoot back.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page