Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

The Right to Keep and Bear ... revolvers only?

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by searcher451, Nov 7, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. searcher451

    searcher451 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2007
    Messages:
    2,516
    Location:
    Oregon
    While attending the Utah concealed weapons permit class in Oregon a couple of nights back (good in 29 states, by the way), our instructor indicated that he was going to start offering special classes exclusively on the use of revolvers because he saw it as the emerging trend in gun ownership. He made the statement in a long string of advertisements for some of his other classes at the start of the session, but I asked him about his logic during the first break.

    He replied that it all has to do with the Heller decision from this past summer and the District's legal response, declaring that all semi-automatic pistols with magazines are essentially fully automatic firearms. He believes (and he's no dummy) that the courts will eventually agree and will subsequently outlaw all semi-automatics, leaving us only with revolvers to protect ourselves.

    I don't know that I agree; I don't know that I don't agree. But I did find it interesting food for thought and decided to share it here, in the event that others might want to weigh on.
     
  2. damien

    damien Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,212
    Location:
    Northern IL, USA
    I don't agree with him. The Heller rationale was that common and ordinary guns are protected. Semiautomatics now outsell revolvers 3 to 1. Basing this on the demented rationale of the D.C. city council (the only city out of thousands in the USA that has banned semi-automatic handguns only) seem to be an incredible stretch of the imagination.

    Anyway, the city council determined they they were on legal quicksand and reversed the rule your instructor points to. Semi-automatics legal are now legal to register.

    http://www.dcexaminer.com/local/Council_eases_DC_gun_laws.html

    Also, let me note two other phrases from your text:

    If he thinks the courts will outlaw anything, he may be a dummy. The legislature might outlaw semi-automatics, but a court cannot. The courts may be called to determine the constitutionality of the law, but they do not legislate themselves. But again, I think the Heller decision actually puts a great impediment in the way of that, considering how it is written.
     
  3. 44Magnum

    44Magnum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2008
    Messages:
    37
    No. A pistol cannot be rightly classified as an automatic because it simply fails to match the definition of an automatic. I realize that wouldn't stop some from trying, but I can't imagine a majority going for it.

    Besides, I've never in my life had anything I like become fashionable. Why would that start now? :)
     
  4. devilc

    devilc Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2007
    Messages:
    83
    Location:
    Lorton, VA
    Anything is possible.
    Look at a lot of our Latin neighbors to the south.
    They may carry but only NON-military calibers.
    That is why Glock makes a line of .380 pistols.
    Even a lot of fascisti nations have CCW.
    75% of the time, all I carry is a SW642.
     
  5. Rubble

    Rubble Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    22
    Location:
    Elgin, IL
    I'm betting we will see the AWB come back without the sunset clause and I've also heard they'll go after semi-autos.


    As far as home protection goes, a revolver is an excellent choice.
    It can sit for years without a decay in spring tension and there
    is nothing to jam. No safety. No magazine to fall out while your fumbling
    half awake.

    Just pick it up and start squeezing them off.
     
  6. heavyshooter

    heavyshooter Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2008
    Messages:
    599
    Location:
    Denver Metro Area
    ^ Ditto to what Rubble said. I do not anticipate semi-autos being banned in any way. But I believe that the instructor should still offer the revolver class do to all of the above reasons.
     
  7. Kind of Blued

    Kind of Blued Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2007
    Messages:
    3,676
    Location:
    Rocky Mountains
    It seems a lot of folks are saying that revolvers are great, and I agree. The point I'd like to make is that having a choice (i.e. freedom) to choose a revolver, or a VZ-61, or a pointy gun-shaped-stick for self-defense, is infinitely better than a default revolver.
     
    Last edited: Nov 8, 2008
  8. MAKster

    MAKster Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Messages:
    2,197
    Since even anti-gun D.C. has finally acknowledged that Heller protects semi-auto handguns, the likelihood of a ban on semi-auto pistols is zero.
     
  9. Just Jim

    Just Jim Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2006
    Messages:
    1,099
    No offense here and not a personal attack. I just don't think you understand socialism. You have a right to own the handgun but they will make you lock it up so you can't get to it when you need it.

    jj
     
  10. rocinante

    rocinante Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2007
    Messages:
    1,306
    Location:
    Alpharetta GA
    Damien I did not know about that D.C. city council change regarding semi automatic weapons. Thank you.

    To the OP tell your buddy not to quit his day job and go into the prophet business full time.
     
  11. MAKster

    MAKster Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Messages:
    2,197
    Switzerland and Israel which everyone loves to proclaim as pro-gun havens are socialist countries. You can also add Finland to that list.
     
  12. moooose102

    moooose102 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2007
    Messages:
    3,024
    Location:
    West Michigan
    while i do not agree with him, i can certainly see our unfreinds in washington trying to eliminate high capacity magazines for our semiauto pistols. how would you like your 9mm to only have a 5 shot magazine. if they have their way, i can see them trying it. what really agrivates me is, the only people this will affect is the avearge law abiding citizen. the criminals will still have the 15-19 round mags. all the anti's are doing is stacking the odds in the favor of the criminals. WHY CAN THEY NOT SEE THIS?????
     
  13. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    47,955
    Location:
    0 hrs east of TN
    As Damine points out, and any CCW instructor should have already known, that one's already been hee-hawed out the door.
     
  14. SHOOT1SAM

    SHOOT1SAM Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2004
    Messages:
    796
    Location:
    Boise, Idaho
    Just Jim:
    IINM, this is one of the aspects covered by the Heller descision, per damien's post:
    Sam
     
  15. Just Jim

    Just Jim Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2006
    Messages:
    1,099
    Sam,

    I have lived too long to believe the socialist are going to let people have guns without severe regulation. Show me a socialist and I will show you a gun grabber. I guess you never heard Obama talk about the constitution being outdated and shouldn't be followed anymore huh???

    jj
     
  16. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    47,955
    Location:
    0 hrs east of TN
    We've already established that the instructor the OP based his question on was mistaken/misspoke/misleading and that DC did abandon the attempt to block semiauto handguns after the Heller decision from SCOTUS.

    Unfortunately we've also begun to drift.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page