The truth about "pressure signs"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Pressure exists as a curve. If the curve is relatively sharp, then you get less overall velocity. If the curve is relatively broad and flat, then you get more velocity. In many instances, we can gain velocity by increasing the dwell of the effective pressure curve without necessarily increasing the peak pressure.

This again seems to assume that you've figured out something the ballisticians don't know, or are at least unwilling to share with us.

If it is possible to gain more velocity without excessive pressure by using a certain powder in a certain amount, why is this information not published in any of the loading manuals?
 
As far as primers having different thicknesses, any idiot who swaps components near or at max charges without working up their loads from starting charges is just that: An idiot who deserves what they get. That doesn't negate the usefulness of people watching for CHANGES in the look of fired primers as they work up their loads.

Well, let's say I've worked up a load with a hard primer. I get to the maximum load listed in the manuals with no change in primer appearance. Does that mean the load is within SAAMI specs? Almost certainly. If I have a chronograph I can use that to essentially verify it. Now I change to a softer primer. The same load now shows primer flattening. Does that mean my load is now exceeding SAAMI specs? We don't have any idea. Does it make an unsafe load? Again, no clue. If we know the brissance of the particular primers we can make an educated guess, along the lines of "Well, I know the softer primer is not as hot as the harder primer, so there's a good chance the load is not making as much pressure", but even that seemingly innocuous statement cannot be taken as gospel. But again, the chronograph and the loading manual give us what we need to know: if you have not exceeded the maximum published load, and your velocity is not drastically higher than should be expected from your barrel length, both loads are almost certainly within SAAMI limits, regardless of what the primer is telling you. At the same time, there's every possibility that you can keep adding powder to the hard primer load, even up to the point of being massively over recommended charges and expected velocity, and your primers still looks just fine.

So what does all this point to? That primer condition is utterly useless as a predictor of pressure, and that the manual and the chronograph are your friends.
 
http://www.thehighroad.us/showthread.php?t=375160 Not myth or tea leaves. Pressure Signs
The bolt will be hard to open when you are over pressure. The primer will not have a rounded edge. The web area of the brass has expanded. There is an ejector mark on the brass head. Case head separation. Primer flowing into & around firing pin. Look at the photos of some signs here. http://www.photobucket.com/joe1944usa Click for larger photos.

Already addressed. All of the signs you mention are listed in the OP and shown fallacious. "Repetition does not equal verification" or something to that effect.

Now, I will certainly admit that some of the gross signs are obviously the results of overpressure. If you are getting blasted with hot gas and your primers fall out when you extract cases, you are overpressure. But how much? 10,000 PSI? 20,000? 50,000? And how much should you back off? Just drop the load until the primers stay put? Is your pressure then safe? Within SAAMI specs? You have no way of knowing -- unless you have stayed within the manual's recommendations and verified your results with a chrono. If you've significantly exceeded either, you are simply guessing again.
 
Last edited:
However, somewhere in the past few years, I believe I have read a study of this--e.g., done with pressure barrels, a run of same-brand brass, etc.--and there simply was no good correlation between diameter expansion and excess pressure. I'll see if I can chase down a link on this issue

I tried this once in a 30-06, nothing correlated, took forever to take the measurements, and I never did it again.

Now, I will certainly admit that some of the gross signs are obviously the results of overpressure. If you are getting blasted with hot gas and your primers fall out when you extract cases, you are overpressure. But how much? 10,000 PSI? 20,000? 50,000? And how much should you back off? Just drop the load until the primers stay put? Is your pressure then safe? Within SAAMI specs? You have no way of knowing -- unless you have stayed within the manual's recommendations and verified your results with a chrono. If you've significantly exceeded either, you are simply guessing again.

This reloading hobby is tricky.

Take a look at Chapter 16 "Important Loading Notes" of Philp B Sharpe's book "Complete Guide to Handloading".

Mr. Sharpe has a whole chapter about how unreliable are the gross indications we commonly use for estimating pressure. In fact he says “We cannot estimate pressure”.

He says that leaking primers, blown primers, and enlarged pockets are positive indications of excessive pressures.

Cratering of primers give false positive signs of over pressure. Sticking cases are not necessarily signs of overpressure. (He actually says “This is also incorrect”)

Still these indications are better than nothing.

He also has a long section on how during load development of the “new” 308 Winchester, he and a bud developed a load. "Pressure estimates as recorded by this author ran from 42,000 to 55,000. Primers looked “good” and extraction was easy”.

He then had that load tested in a pressure gun, and it was 66,660 CUP average with a high of 68,000 CUP.

I think one of his points he was trying to make was that you can have excessive pressure, without any “signs” of excessive pressure.

I believe that if the velocities over the screen exceed published values, than so are the pressures.

But I also have one "slow" barrel, and I believe it is possible to have overpressure loads without getting the higher velocity indications.
 
What about CIP standards? They have different testing procedures and in some cases different cartridge specs than SAAMI. These things produce different pressures.

Pretty much the whole world besides the USA uses CIP. Who has the right numbers? How do we know?

CIP will test handloaded ammo for pressure. Will SAAMI do that?
 
The truth about pressure? I do not have enough ambition to get out front and claim there is no answer, those that do start with "Me and other bench rest shooters etc., etc.. then it goes straight to shooting the same case with maximum loads 50 times, again I have no interest in shooting one case 5 times, but when I do 5 maximum loads fired in the same case has an effect on the case, my cases do not have an exemption to rules. For example the case head will expand in diameter and shorten (compress) because of yield pressure, let us pretend the case head does expand due to compression .00025 thousand when loaded to maximum the first time it is fired, if fired 50 times and the same rule applied, the case head would expand .0115, copper crush, brass crush and measuring case head expansion to determine the beginning of pressure signs, if you do not believe you can do it, you can not do it. Maximum loads hammer the case head and body, the case wall should get thinner, the case head should compress, if I shot a case 50 times I would be able to compare the weight of the case with one that was never fired because I would have saved at least 5 cases for comparison, I would be able to compare the effect 50 firings had on the case wall, I would know how much brass was removed by trimming, trimming required because of the hammering, hammering that causes brass flow and or stretch ( without skid marks), if the bench rest shooter does nothing but shoot he should be able to determine the amount of brass lost after 50 firings, if the case head compresses and the case body locks onto the chamber wall, every time the case is fired, the case head moves back from the case body every time it is fired even if there is .000 head space (if the case head compresses) if there is any truth to the .00025 case head expansion.

Bladed micrometers, there was a time when shell holders could be used, as evident today when the question is asked "After reloading and firing my ammo, the case will not fit the shell holder", shell holders have too much slack for alignment to rely on them today but in the old days shell holders kept cases aligned in presses that leaned back and there was a time a mounting wedge could be purchased for presses that went perpendicular.

F. Guffey
 
Again: setting with a friend that builds custom rifles at the Market Hall Gun Show, one of his customers tells him the rifle he built had head space issues, I did not get involved, the customer was asked to bring the rifle to the shop to be checked, then they were finished, I then asked to see the case he claimed had damage caused by excessive head, after examining the case I ask him if that was the only case he had and was he reloading it over and over etc., again, he did not understand the question, the case wall was .0025 thick, he carried the case in a splint/sling because there was nothing holding the brittle, cracked, split case together, he was sent to a third party for another evaluation, he was no happier with that assessment as he was with my opinion, he did not bring the rifle in to be checked and he turned down my offer to form cases for him, I suggested he spread the wear and tare out over 200 cases instead of shooting the same case over and over etc..

F. Guffey
 
No. I already said what I was trying to say. You cannot grossly exceed published limits while "knowing" you are staying within SAAMI pressure limits based upon signs like brass and primer condition.

Yeah, I read what you were trying to say and it could have been summed up in one sentence that most educated reloaders already know. Summary of your entire novella;

You cannot determine actual pressure by using indirect signs of pressure and therefore cannot say with confidence if your load is "safe" with regards to the published SAAMI specs.

Nothing new there. The definition of safe is the only thing that you seem to be arguing with people about. Most firearms will safely handle pressure over the SAAMI limit (9mm +P+ is a perfect example) but that doesn't mean they are "safe" if your definition of "safe" is keeping a chamber pressure beneath the SAAMI max. More importantly, your chrono is just another indirect measure of pressure, test barrel v. your gun. Their velocity/pressure may not match yours.

CIP will test handloaded ammo for pressure. Will SAAMI do that?

SAAMI provides technical specifications. They tell you how to test, they don't test. In that way, they are just like most industry standards organizations.
 
Your thread detailing the pressure guessing methods you use in working up benchrest loads was irresponsible, as is your repetition of the idea that you alone have figured out a way to drive bullets hundreds of feet per second faster than any published load while still maintaining SAAMI specs. Your "guarantee" is useless, because it is based upon the exact guessing methods shown time and again to be without merit. I think it's high time people like you stopped encouraging folks to push the limits of safety based upon little more than tea leaves.

.38 Special,

You know, it's funny, with someone with your great knowledge, I never see you helping anyone on this site with reloading questions. It's always guys like rcmodel, Walkalong, ReloaderFred and others that are doing the heavy lifting. You simply come on this site to "stir things up", after you get tired of doing the same on other sites. If you want to stay below Sierra's published "Maximum Load - Use Caution", fine, nobody's forcing you not to. But, just for your education, call Sierra at 1-800-223-8799 and ask one of their ballisticians what the pressure is for a particular maximum load listed in their reloading manual. Here is what they will tell you: "We don't have the pressure spec's for any of our maximum loads - we simply decided to stop there". So if they decide to call a 55k psi load "Maximum", when the SAAMI spec's are 60k psi, then that is what you get. Also, FWIW, I am not a benchrest shooter and am not "working up benchrest loads". And as for the idea that I "alone have figured out a way to drive bullets hundreds of feet per second faster than any published load while still maintaining SAAMI specs", I have never claimed that. I have worked with many other reloaders in this endeavor, using methods in use for probably a hundred years. So, call it guessing, or reading tea leaves, or what have you, but the truth is, a safe load in a particular firearm is safe load - Period!

Don
 
but the truth is, a safe load in a particular firearm is safe load - Period!

That may well be quite true and is really a different discussion however befitting it's own thread. HOWEVER don't delude yourself into thinking a 2900fps 190grn bullet from an 06 or the aforementioned 180grainer at 2800 isn't exceeding the saami pressure limitation for that cartridge, it just doesn't exceed the pressure limitation for your rifle. DON'T CONFUSE THE TWO!

Most pressure tested 300win mag data I can find puts 190grain bullets at velocities you get from your 06 at between 61k to 62.8kpsi burning powders just as low or slower than you. Now are you gonna tell us that your 30-06 load getting the same velocity at 60,000psi or less but with 20% less case capacity..:scrutiny:
 
Pressure exists as a curve. If the curve is relatively sharp, then you get less overall velocity. If the curve is relatively broad and flat, then you get more velocity. In many instances, we can gain velocity by increasing the dwell of the effective pressure curve without necessarily increasing the peak pressure.
This again seems to assume that you've figured out something the ballisticians don't know, or are at least unwilling to share with us.

If it is possible to gain more velocity without excessive pressure by using a certain powder in a certain amount, why is this information not published in any of the loading manuals?
The loading manuals show us this, as you look at the progression of powders, from fast to slow, and see how they generate different velocities for the same max pressure. That was my only point - that optimizing the pressure curve is what gives us velocity increases.

It was not an attack, only a statement.

<putting on Mod hat>

38Special - you really need to be less confrontational. Please consider that formal advice.

<taking off Mod hat>
 
So, call it guessing, or reading tea leaves, or what have you, but the truth is, a safe load in a particular firearm is safe load - Period!

This is not a bad answer at all.

This thread set me to thinking, what are we worried about?

First of all, we don't want to bust the gas seal. That is the cartridge case. If you rupture the thing where it is not supported, gas will flow out and what will happen afterwards will be uncontrolled.

Second of all, we don't want to bust the mechanism. Metal fatique and all those evils are unlikely to happen in a modern, well made, 4140 steel mechanism. With modern metals if you stress the action too much, the metal will at least show cracks before it breaks. Can't say that about those WW1 era actions. Old carbon steel actions heat treated by eye ball can break in a lot of different ways.

Some people are quite willing to live with one firing per case. I have been squadded with them, the Military teams, their long range loads are so hot, the cases are not reloadable. I have picked up their once fired cases and had the primers fall out.

I can't afford that, so I try to get a much longer case life.

Standards groups, like SAAMI, they set industry standards that should be "safe" in everyone's firearm. That does not mean that some firearms won't have more "margin" than others.
 
"The truth about "pressure signs"

You are right. Or at least as right as those you disparage.


"Primer reading -- seems to be the most commonly used method, probably because it takes the least effort. It may be the most useless, too."

Largely correct. Actually, "flat" primers DID mean something when that "pressure gage" was first noted. Back prior to the mid or late 60s, most primers were made with concave faces. When they went flat, pressures were indeed high. No one mentioneds that today's primers come "pre-flattened" and the old rule no longer has much application. Today, it most often only shows excessive "head space".


"..as an absolute indication of overpressure. The question, though, is "how much", ..."

Nothing about chamber pressure is truly an absolute, so guesses of "how much" isn't the point; All of the signs we use are no more than indications that the pressure is TOO HIGH, the specific level is irrelivant isn't it?


"Then there is hard bolt lift -- the case head has extruded into the extractor cut and the extruded bit then has to be sheared by the bolt in order to extract (hence the shiny spot on the case head.) ... much like primers, brass cases vary in toughness. A soft case (Norma is a common offender) may well flow at safe pressure levels, while a very tough case (Lake City, Lapua) may not show any sign of pressure until SAAMI specs have been massively exceeded."

Yes, BUT...the issue is that the load is too hot for that case in that rifle, it's not given as an absolute. If the Norma case flows, it IS NOT a safe pressure level FOR THAT CASE! If a case in use turns loose it won't matter that the same load would have been safe with a different brand case. We must be safe with what we are using, what we are not using is of no help to us!


"The case itself is responsible for very little of the strength of the rifle/case combo,"

True but largely irrelivant. The "very little" strength of the case makes a lot of difference in the event. Soft cases WILL rupture or blow primer pockets sooner than harder cases. How violently a rupture occurs depends a lot on how, and how much, of the case is supported in the chamber but a soft/thin case will always give way sooner than a hard/thick one.


"so soft cases are just as safe and useful as hard ones."

Not even close to being true, at least not so with most rifles.


"a custom benchrest rifle isn't going to give any of the typical pressure signs until 85,000+ PSI.)"

Okay, that can be true. But how does that matter to those of us with common factory rifles? Or the BR guy whose rifle can handle it? And the premise of this statement seems to be in contridiction of your statement above about soft cases being is as safe as hard cases. ??


"..a gun with a large extractor cutout is going to show more extrusion than one with a small, tightly fitted one."

Exactly. The one with the larger cutout IS less supported than one in a tight chamber tho. And if it turns loose, the results WILL be noticable, right?


"Going by the shiny spot, an 80,000 PSI load is "safe" in the match rifle, while the 45,000 PSI load is "overpressure" in the old milsurp. Both "truths" are false."

How can that be false? If the tight rifle is handling the greater pressure but the old milsurp isn't, are we to assume loading the milsurp hotter would be safe? Or should we automatically need to load the modern rifle down to old milsurp levels? In either instance, THAT would be false!


"Which brings us to measuring case heads. ... more recent testing has shown that even loads put together by experienced professionals using this technique have exceeded 70,000 or even 80,000 PSI, which exceeds SAAMI limits...reading pressure signs is synonymous with pressure guessing, with your rifle -- not to mention health -- on the line."

Correct, but so what? We aren't shooting SAAMIs, we are shooting individual arms. The original data WAS safe in the arms it was developed in and the point of testing is to determine if a load, including the case, is excessive for the weapon WE use it in, right? And those who have determined those high pressue loads are NOT excessive for their weapon seems very close to some of your own earlier arguments to the contrary! All that's what the old adage to "start low and work up only if we see no exessive pressure signs" is all about, right?


"..the idea that the hobbyist handloader can learn more about pressure by looking at his cases than the professional ballistician .."

Now, in some 45+ years of reloading and reading a LOT of liturature on the subject, that's the first time I've ever seen that observation. NO ONE suggests we can do better than the pros. Instead, we are each doing the best we can with the tools and skills we bring to the table. So long as we can actually recognise that our load is getting too hot - and back off - we have done exactly what we need to do. We (usually) recognise that our hot loads may not be safe for others, and it's all done by "reading the signs".

What, or how would you suggest we do otherwise?
 
Last edited:
I think a good example of the difference between what is the standard and what is safe, and how common sense can be applied to the process is the .45 Colt and what has been done with it for the last 75 years or so. Common loads are double the SAAMI limit for that cartridge, yet no one (other than maybe Chuck Hawks) is running around talking about how unsafe that is when used in Ruger/FA/TC firearms.

Obviously, it has gained enough acceptance to be included in most loading manuals as such, but it got that way because enough people were already doing it.
 
Most pressure tested 300win mag data I can find puts 190grain bullets at velocities you get from your 06 at between 61k to 62.8kpsi burning powders just as low or slower than you. Now are you gonna tell us that your 30-06 load getting the same velocity at 60,000psi or less but with 20% less case capacity.

Krochus,

Don't know where you're getting your .300Win Mag data from, but even the conservative Sierra Reloading manual lists many 3000fps loads for the .300WM using the 190gr Sierra MatchKing bullet. If you go to Snipershide.com and inquire about the .30-06 190SMK load, you will find it to be an established load, with many guys who have used it. Although, I must admit, when myself and Shane (MontanaMarine on the Hide) were first developing this load about 7 or 8 years ago, there were many who found it hard to believe. But, Shane plugged all the numbers into Quick Load, and I believe it came up with 58.9k psi for my particular load. Regarding case capacity, this is no different from the 7.62x51 .vs the .30-06 with a 150gr FMJ bullet. Both are able to reach 2800fps even though the 7.62x51 has less case capacity than the .30-06 and uses less powder to achieve it. Also, you have to understand, I have a 26" Krieger barrel. Would you be able to reach 2900fps with a 22" factory barrel? Not likely.

Don
 
You know, it's funny, with someone with your great knowledge, I never see you helping anyone on this site with reloading questions. It's always guys like rcmodel, Walkalong, ReloaderFred and others that are doing the heavy lifting.

I help whenever I A) see a question that I can answer and B) it has not already been correctly answered by people like those you have mentioned. If I had known you were keeping a running tally I would have emailed you whenever I posted.

You simply come on this site to "stir things up", after you get tired of doing the same on other sites.

Your "knowledge" of things you cannot possibly know, along with a willingness to make public comments on them, is remarkable.

If you want to stay below Sierra's published "Maximum Load - Use Caution", fine, nobody's forcing you not to. But, just for your education, call Sierra at 1-800-223-8799 and ask one of their ballisticians what the pressure is for a particular maximum load listed in their reloading manual. Here is what they will tell you: "We don't have the pressure spec's for any of our maximum loads - we simply decided to stop there". So if they decide to call a 55k psi load "Maximum", when the SAAMI spec's are 60k psi, then that is what you get.

So your reaction is to essentially ignore those maximum loads and strike out on your own, using disproven methods to determine what is "safe" and what is not.

Also, FWIW, I am not a benchrest shooter and am not "working up benchrest loads". And as for the idea that I "alone have figured out a way to drive bullets hundreds of feet per second faster than any published load while still maintaining SAAMI specs", I have never claimed that. I have worked with many other reloaders in this endeavor, using methods in use for probably a hundred years.

I have not shot F-class, as you claim to, but I m led to believe that most of the loading techniques and rifle/action building methods are identical.
So, call it guessing, or reading tea leaves, or what have you, but the truth is, a safe load in a particular firearm is safe load - Period!

This is perfectly true. The point is that you don't really know if your loads are safe or not, because you don't know how much pressure they are generating and you don't know how much pressure your rifle can stand, nor how many times it can stand it. I hope luck continues to be on your side.
 
Last edited:
The loading manuals show us this, as you look at the progression of powders, from fast to slow, and see how they generate different velocities for the same max pressure. That was my only point - that optimizing the pressure curve is what gives us velocity increases.

It was not an attack, only a statement.

It was printed in response to my claim that the handloader is not going to get a 190 grain bullet to 2900 FPS in a .30-'06 while still staying under pressure spec. I think most of us understand the time/pressure curve as it relates to velocity, including the ballisticians. If just using a slower powder could get us to the 190/2900 level, I imagine those loads would have been published in the big manuals. I'm sorry you saw my reply as confrontational, but I think you are reading more into it than you should have.

38Special - you really need to be less confrontational. Please consider that formal advice.

I tend to respond in kind. I encourage posts like the one from "Ranger". I do not care for the personally directed nonsense from posters like USSR, however, and will respond to them whenever they are allowed to stand.
 
Last edited:
Nothing about chamber pressure is truly an absolute, so guesses of "how much" isn't the point; All of the signs we use are no more than indications that the pressure is TOO HIGH, the specific level is irrelivant isn't it?

Not IMO, because if you are getting pressure signs (which may or may not actually mean pressure is too high) what do you do about them? And how do you then know pressures are low enough after you have taken action?

Yes, BUT...the issue is that the load is too hot for that case in that rifle, it's not given as an absolute. If the Norma case flows, it IS NOT a safe pressure level FOR THAT CASE!

How do you know that to be true?

If a case in use turns loose it won't matter that the same load would have been safe with a different brand case. We must be safe with what we are using, what we are not using is of no help to us!

You are equating brass flowing into the ejector port with a case that is about to let go. I have never seen any evidence that brass flowing into the ejector cutout IN A LOAD MEETING SAAMI PRESSURE SPECS is a risk factor. Granted, if you are using an extremely soft case -- perhaps one damaged by overzealous annealing -- then you are risk with any reasonable pressure level, but I have never heard of this happening with modern, unaltered factory cases.

The "very little" strength of the case" makes a lot of difference in the event. Soft cases WILL rupture or blow primer pockets sooner than harder cases. How violently a rupture occurs depends a lot on how, and how much, of the case is supported in the chamber but a soft/thin case will always give way sooner than a hard/thick one.

True, but only when SAAMI pressure levels have been grossly exceeded -- unless one is arguing that certain brands of case are not safe with SAAMI loads.


"so soft cases are just as safe and useful as hard ones."

Not even close to being true, at least not so with most rifles.

I have used "soft" cases for decades without problem. But I never exceed maximum loads and am usually well under them, as I decide upon what rifle to buy based upon my needs, ie. if I want a certain bullet to go a certain speed I buy a rifle that can do that with published loads. I don't buy a rifle of lesser ability on the assumption that I can go off on my own and make it into something it wasn't meant to be.


"a custom benchrest rifle isn't going to give any of the typical pressure signs until 85,000+ PSI.)"

Okay, that can be true. But how does that matter to those of us with common factory rifles? Or the BR guy whose rifle can handle it? And the premise of this statement seems to be in contridiction of your statement above about soft cases being is as safe as hard cases. ??

It matters primarily as an illustration that there are far too many variables in "reading pressure signs" for any of those methods to mean much. As for any contradictions, you'll have to be more specific. I don't don't see it.

"..a gun with a large extractor cutout is going to show more extrusion than one with a small, tightly fitted one."

Exactly. The one with the larger cutout IS less supported than one in a tight chamber tho. And if it turns loose, the results WILL be noticable, right?

At pressures well above specification. But is the gun with the larger extractor clearance "dangerous"? I have seen no evidence of it.

"Going by the shiny spot, an 80,000 PSI load is "safe" in the match rifle, while the 45,000 PSI load is "overpressure" in the old milsurp. Both "truths" are false."

How can that be false? If the tight rifle is handling the greater pressure but the old milsurp isn't, are we to assume loading the milsurp hotter would be safe? Or should we automatically need to load the modern rifle down to old milsurp levels? In either instance, THAT would be false!

The match rifle may or may not be able to handle 80,000 PSI. There's no real way to know, other than destructive testing. Which is exactly how it was determined that 45,000 PSI (or more, in many cases) is safe in the old milsurp. The shiny spot on the case tells us nothing about how much pressure the action can handle.


"Which brings us to measuring case heads. ... more recent testing has shown that even loads put together by experienced professionals using this technique have exceeded 70,000 or even 80,000 PSI, which exceeds SAAMI limits...reading pressure signs is synonymous with pressure guessing, with your rifle -- not to mention health -- on the line."

Correct, but so what? We aren't shooting SAAMIs, we are shooting individual arms. The original data WAS safe in the arms it was developed in and the point of testing is to determine if a load, including the case, is excessive for the weapon WE use it in, right? And those who have determined those high pressue loads are NOT excessive for their weapon seems very close to some of your own earlier arguments to the contrary! All that's what the old adage to "start low and work up only if we see no exessive pressure signs" is all about, right?

This strikes me as fairly circular: "Pressure signs are valid in individual rifles because if the individual rifles don't show any pressure signs they are safe, so pressure signs are valid."

"..the idea that the hobbyist handloader can learn more about pressure by looking at his cases than the professional ballistician .."

Now, in some 45+ years of reloading and reading a LOT of liturature on the subject, that's the first time I've ever seen that observation. NO ONE suggests we can do better than the pros. Instead, we are each doing the best we can with the tools and skills we bring to the table. So long as we can actually recognise that our load is getting too hot - and back off - we have done exactly what we need to do. We (usually) recognise that our hot loads may not be safe for others, and it's all done by "reading the signs".

It seems to me that any time someone suggests that one can safely exceed published loads through the use of pressure signs, he is indeed suggesting that the home handloader knows more about ballistics than do ballisticians.

What, or how would you suggest we do otherwise?

I have already suggested it: buy a rifle based upon your needs. If your needs exceed the cartridge's KNOWN AND PUBLISHED abilities, then buy a different rifle.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, sounds like you were primed and ready to respond in kind.

I assumed people would take that in the light-hearted manner it was obviously intended.

I'm naive, I suppose, but I tend to forget how much some people enjoy finding the smallest nit to pick.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top