Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

thinest and smallest CC pistol in 9mm or 40SW?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by new_steyr1, Dec 11, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. new_steyr1

    new_steyr1 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2008
    Messages:
    47
    What's the smallest and thinest CC pistol in either 9mm or 40SW?
     
  2. gbelleh

    gbelleh Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,747
    Location:
    Kansas
    Rohrbaugh in 9mm. Probably Kahr PM40 in .40.
     
  3. IMTHDUKE

    IMTHDUKE Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2004
    Messages:
    1,022
    Location:
    Sweet Home Alabama
  4. glock_17_4U

    glock_17_4U Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2008
    Messages:
    50
    not the right answer, but I have to say it

    You could get a glock 23 and a 9mm conversion barrel and 9mm mags plus ammo cheaper than just a rohrbaug.
     
    Last edited: Dec 12, 2008
  5. SniperStraz

    SniperStraz Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    851
    Well you're a new member. I don't know if you're new to guns, but if you are the Rohrbaugh isn't the way to go IMHO. The Rohrbaugh is expesive and is not fun to practice with. Aside from that it is my understanding that they don't advise shooting it very often if you arn't going to replace the springs.
    I would have to vote Kel-Tec PF9. Now I don't want to sound like a hypocrite but the truth is the PF9 isn't much fun to shoot either. You can't go wrong with it though. If you really hate it your only down $250 and can probably sell it for $225 pretty easily. Just my .02 Good luck
     
  6. dogtown tom

    dogtown tom Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,301
    Location:
    Plano, Texas
    Kahr PM9 for the win!:D:D:D
     
  7. OregonJohnny

    OregonJohnny Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,067
    Location:
    Oregon
    I've been studying this exact subject as of late. My Springfield XD-40 subcompact is too thick to be comfortable for me to conceal IWB (in waist band). Here's what you seem to be looking for: a 9mm or .40S&W single stack with thin profile grips. The Rohrbaugh has been mentioned, but last I checked, they run around $900-$1000, if you can find one. The Walther PPS 9mm is .91" wide at the thickest part of grip compared to about 1.25" for a Glock, XD, or 1911 with standard grip panels. The PPS doesn't excite me for some reason. It's not pretty to look at, and the ergonomics, especially the magazine release, look uncomfortable.

    The Sig 239 is a single stack 9mm. It looks like heaven and probably shoots like heaven, too. But it's on the large side for a single stack. About 1.2" wide at the grip.

    The thinnest 1911-style 9mm is the Springfield EMP, which is about 1.1" thick in the grip I think.

    The new Kahr P380 measures less than .75" thick at the thickest part of the grip. But it's a .380. And those will probably be hard to find for a while until they are out for a while.

    I've thought a lot about the Kahr PM and MK 9 and 40. I've never shot one. I've heard both good and bad things about them, with the majority been positive. If I ever get my hands on a PM9 to shoot and it proves reliable for me, I'd consider picking one up. They are in the same size league as the Ruger, Seecamp, Kel-Tec, etc. mouse guns.

    Anyway, hope some of that helps or gives you some stuff to research. Kahr PM9, Walther PPS, Rohrbaugh R9, Springfield EMP, Sig 239, Kel-Tec PF-9. Start there.
     
    Last edited: Dec 12, 2008
  8. GZOh_Jr

    GZOh_Jr Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2008
    Messages:
    78
    Location:
    Raleigh, NC
    I was just at the store checking out CCWs today.

    The Glock 26 is a bit thinner--1.18". Yes, the PPS and all 9mm Kahrs are ~.90" and are nice and thin. However, the Kahrs have this huge, sharp slide release that juts out from the side and is completely out of place considering the otherwise sleek lines of the Kahrs.

    I liked the PPS, but it seemed pricey compared to what you got (i.e., when compared the less expensive Glock). But I was very impressed with the Taurus Millenium Pro 111. It too is barely over an inch but had great ergonomics and is barely over $300. I also held a Kel-tec, but it was not in the same league as the other guns by any stretch--it would only be considered if I absolutely positively could not afford anything else.

    The last .10th of an inch or so of grip size didn't really matter to me as much as the overall feel of the gun. So...I came away liking the Glock (also for the ability to buy a .22 slide for cheap practicing) altogether, but thinking about how tempting the Taurus was at its price.

    I think the determining factor will be the status of my bank account on the day that I decide to buy.
     
  9. bluemalibu

    bluemalibu Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2008
    Messages:
    30
    O/J if you have occasion to head south a bit, the indoor range near here has all Kahr flavors in stock to rent.

    That's where I learned that I couldn't live without them!

    We're 180 miles south of the border in Chico.
     
  10. bigmike45

    bigmike45 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2004
    Messages:
    1,021
    Location:
    Texas
    If you don't want to spend the money for the Rohrbaugh, which is a very good gun, you could look at the Kel-Tec PF-9. I have one and it has been flawless. Not much bigger than the Rohrbaugh.
    [​IMG]
     
  11. E5

    E5 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2006
    Messages:
    42
    Go hold a walther PPS. It's like a credit card that goes BANG.
     
  12. IdahoLT1

    IdahoLT1 Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2008
    Messages:
    825
    Location:
    Boise, Idaho
    Id say any of the Kahrs. Much more concealable than the Glock SC and XD sc.
     
  13. kokapelli

    kokapelli Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2004
    Messages:
    3,605
    Location:
    Arizona
    If you shoot the PM9 and the PF9, I'm sure you'll end up with a PM9, at least I did.
     
  14. xx7grant7x

    xx7grant7x Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2007
    Messages:
    382
    the PPS is thin, and shoots nice too!
     
  15. franconialocal

    franconialocal Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2008
    Messages:
    673
    Location:
    New Hampshire
    Springfield

    Springfield EMP 1911 style 9mm. I love mine. Heck of a gun in a small package. Very concealable. I can't say enough good things about it. Probably my favorite sidearm ever (ok....a tie with my Sig P220)
     
  16. owlhoot

    owlhoot Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2005
    Messages:
    934
    Stick with a 9mm. The .40 is just too punishing in a tiny gun. If it isn't pleasant to shoot, you won't practice and you may pick up bad habits to boot.

    I have the Kahr MK9 and love it, and it is extremely pleasant to shoot, but it is heavy for its small size.

    You might look at the CW9 as well as the PF9 and the Walther PPS is certainly a candidate.
     
  17. ConstantineJ9

    ConstantineJ9 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2008
    Messages:
    127
  18. 71Commander

    71Commander Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Messages:
    2,336
    Location:
    Headin back to Johnson City
    But you'd still be stuck with a Glock.:barf:
     
  19. Grassman

    Grassman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,778
    Location:
    Texas
    I got a Skyy 9mm. Good size for CC. Only set me back $270.
     
  20. biggiesmalls

    biggiesmalls Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2007
    Messages:
    352
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    kahr and keltec are the smallest FUNCTIONAL ones i've found. the Rohrbaugh is definitely pricey and i'm not sure if it's worth it. if it's strictly for concealed carry i'd take the aforementioned 2 over glock and XD. i own all of them and they definitely carry very differently.
     
  21. Loomis

    Loomis member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Messages:
    938
    "The thinnest 1911-style 9mm is the Springfield EMP, which is about 1.1" thick in the grip I think. "


    Nope, I don't think so.

    The thinnest 1911 is the STI LS9
     
  22. Rodentman

    Rodentman Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    857
    Location:
    MN
    I have a PM40 which is easy to carry and fun to shoot. I don't object to the recoil, but it definitely gets your attention.

    I've had it for about 5 years. I saw one today at the gun store for $800. I don't know if I'd pay that for it, however.
     
  23. Geezer Glide

    Geezer Glide Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2008
    Messages:
    223
    Location:
    South Carolina
    For about the same money, you could buy a Rohrbaugh or 4 PF-9's.
     
  24. ConstantineJ9

    ConstantineJ9 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2008
    Messages:
    127
  25. Zsnark

    Zsnark Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2006
    Messages:
    79
    Location:
    Southwest USA
    Old Time Response!

    Hi Gunners,

    I've got a Star BKM which is very flat, handles easily (even with my big hands), is light, and shoots to point of aim very well for a carry piece. Gotta' use ammo with a nicely rounded bullet shape or your aggressive hollow points will quickly dig gouges in the feed ramp impeding their use.

    I've got mine loaded with either Glasers or BATs (European hotrod 9s which I've owned since the late 70s/ early 80s).

    It's not tiny, like some of the new ultra 9mm packages; but, like I said; it works in my big hands.

    Unfortunately, Star went belly up some years back. So, you've gotta' look for a pre-owned piece. For which, I am seeking, myself.

    Just my opinion...but, I've handled a bunch of other tiny blasters which you really need a lot of practice to handle confidently.

    Z
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page