Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Third party liability when selling a gun on a gun forum

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by Paten, Sep 14, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Paten

    Paten Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    5
    Location:
    Tampa, FL
    Another firearms related forum that I am a member of, does not allow it's members to post threads to sell their guns. I'm not saying they are right or wrong in this but what kind of legal liability could they possibly have if someone sold a gun on their site and a problem arose between the parties involved? To me, it's no different then advertising in the paper except it's free. How many times has a newspaper been sued because of gun being sold thru it's classified ads? I'm just trying to understand why they get all bent out of shape when someone even mentions having a gun for sale. Personally, I think they are just being paranoid, but that's just me. The reason I'm posting this here is because they will not even allow the matter to be discussed without locking the thread.
     
  2. TarpleyG

    TarpleyG Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    2,981
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Yeah, I've been a little miffed about their policies too, but, hey, it's their website and the make the rules that you agreed to when you signed up.

    GT
     
  3. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    The irrational fear of firearms is called "hoplophobia." I don't know what the irrational fear of lawyers is called.
     
  4. cordex

    cordex Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2002
    Messages:
    2,714
    Location:
    Indiana
    Round here we call it KSFreemanophobia.
    Or is that the rational fear? Hmmmm....
    :)
    Their house, their rules. Sometimes you have to just shrug and move on.
     
  5. marvl

    marvl Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2003
    Messages:
    85
    Location:
    Colorado
    "Common sense"? :D
     
  6. Henry Bowman

    Henry Bowman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    6,717
    Location:
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Any fear of lawyers is not irrational. :D
     
  7. MagKnightX

    MagKnightX Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2003
    Messages:
    867
    No, lawyers are fine and nothing to be afraid of, in general. It's the greedy ones who will find a reason to sue for anything so they get more fees from more clients you have to be afraid of.
     
  8. HABU

    HABU Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    536
    Location:
    Western Washington
    People still visit that other site?:neener:
     
  9. OEF_VET

    OEF_VET Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2003
    Messages:
    2,062
    Location:
    Murfreesboro, TN
    You only need to fear lawyers when you've done something wrong, or have avoided doing something which causes you to liable for something wrong.

    Of course, if the administrators of some other site have determined that they don't want to allow transactions to occur through their site, then that's their right. If the members don't lke it, they've got two choices, they can either buck up and live with it, or they can move on to pastures more inline with their likes.

    frank
     
  10. synoptic

    synoptic Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2003
    Messages:
    410
    Location:
    Huntsville, tx
    Unfortunately that's not true. The time to fear lawyers the most is when you have done nothing wrong but in the lawyer's eyes you have. We all take that risk every day by carrying, keeping an HD gun, etc... If this wasn't the case the NRA would have no reason to sell insurance to aid in lawsuits.
     
  11. redneck2

    redneck2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    11,058
    Location:
    Northern Indiana
    Yeah...

    McDonald's did something wrong by selling the woman a hot cup of coffee

    Unfortunately, the thing we do "wrong" is to be worth enough money that we can be sued successfully. Until people who bring unwarranted suits are held accountable, it will never change
     
  12. TexasVet

    TexasVet Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    402
    Location:
    deep east Texas
    We ought to make the opposing lawyer pay for all costs in a case that the jury finds frivolous.:D
     
  13. BerettaNut92

    BerettaNut92 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2002
    Messages:
    9,724
    Their house, their rules....don't know what the chances are, but can't say I blame them either.
     
  14. JohnBT

    JohnBT Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    13,233
    Location:
    Richmond, Virginia
    Their site, their rules, etc., etc., etc...

    But now the policy pohibits making posts containing statements such as "Would I be crazy to sell my early Python so I can buy a used Taurus?" This is considered hinting/suggesting/fishing for a sale.

    Also prohibited, it appears, would be statements such as "Should I sell my 6 unfired Swensons so I can afford to marry off my ugly 40-year-old daughter."

    Their site, their rules, etc., etc., etc.

    John
     
  15. buzz_knox

    buzz_knox Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    4,849
    That would be true, if there were not lawyers who make a living from bringing baseless or fraudulent claims, or suborning perjury. I'm all too familiar with those.

    There are already mechanisms for that (i.e. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11). Unfortunately, they are rarely utilized to the extent needed or justified. Lawyers don't hunt their own.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page