Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

this is ridiculous!

Discussion in 'Legal' started by redranger1, Feb 16, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. redranger1

    redranger1 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    Messages:
    343
    Location:
    Iberia, MO
    i was watchin the news tonight and columbia, mo is considering getting some of those cameras that take a picture of yer car when you run a red light so they can send the owner of the car a ticket in the mail. they admited that they cannot take pictures of the driver so it is the the person that the car is registered to that gets the ticket whether they was driving or not. i dont know bout you fellas but this isnt right! so whats next? the cops come arrest you because a gun that you loaned to a buddy was used in a crime and the gun is registered to you so you must be guilty??? this is a dangerous president if you ask me. not to mention a violation of rights. what happened to innocent until prooven guilty? :fire:
     
  2. Meplat

    Meplat Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Messages:
    365
    Location:
    Down in Dixie
    Dunno, but if a car registered to you gets a parking ticket, you get to pay the fine. Loaned my lumpheaded little brother one once, he racked up a bevy of parking tickets, never told me. I got to pay them. HE got to pay ME. :)

    BTW...they do this in England as matter of course now. The kids have a new past time. They climb on their crotch rockets, hang a cloth over the plates, and since they wear full face tinted helmets, they can't get them there either. They blast past the lights over and over again, til they drive the cameras buggy or run it out of film.
     
  3. UWstudent

    UWstudent member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Messages:
    225
    Location:
    Seattle
    they've been doing it in lakewood WA for years..

    the ticket does not cause your insurance rates to rise and you can get the ticket removed by saying you weren't driving the vehicle.
     
  4. Rob1035

    Rob1035 Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2005
    Messages:
    1,091
    Location:
    MD, USA
    Charlotte has had the scameras for a while now as well
     
  5. Infidel

    Infidel Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Messages:
    279
    Location:
    TX
    I agree that it is ridiculous. Instead of cameras for red light runners, they should use flame throwers or phasers set to vaporize. I hate red light runners.

    I agree, but the alternatives in the last two election cycles were even worse.
     
  6. Taurus 66

    Taurus 66 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Messages:
    1,485
    Location:
    Rochester, NY
    Don't loan out your guns to anyone, buddy or not! They got money like you and can get their own stuff if they want. What's more important, your friendship or freedom?
     
  7. gunsmith

    gunsmith member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2003
    Messages:
    5,906
    Location:
    Reno, Nevada
    yellow light runners , really.

    ...you know they time those lights differently then regular lights, don't you?
    it increases their revenue . those cameras also increase rear end collisions.
    I say ..take em out with your 10/22...even a high powered air rifle would work.
     
  8. 3rdpig

    3rdpig Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    603
    You know what those things cost? Go to jail for destruction of .gov property, have to pay them back for damages and probably lose all your guns and your right to buy any more in the future? With all the traffic shootings the cops take that kind of stuff deadly seriously. I hope you're going to lead the way here. Let us know from your jail cell how it goes.

    Red light runners are a real problem in my city, I forget what the numbers are but they cause a lot of death and injury. It's not possible or practical to post a traffic cop at every red light, cameras are the only answer to control it.
     
  9. Crosshair

    Crosshair Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2005
    Messages:
    1,985
    Location:
    Grand Forks, North Dakota
    There is a good reason these things are in bulletproof housings.
     
  10. Can'thavenuthingood

    Can'thavenuthingood Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2004
    Messages:
    704
    Location:
    California
    Orange county Grand jury investigation into Red Light Camera's (RLC's) didn't really find positive results. City of Westminster raised the medians and accidents dropped 24%.
    http://www.ocgrandjury.org/pdfs/redlight.pdf

    Lots of traffic safety studies here. Seems that extending the length of the yellow light resolves many intersection conflicts. Longer yellow allows cars to finish clearing the intersection. Shorter yellows create early greens and lotsa revenues.
    http://www.hwysafety.com/hwy_intro_redlight.htm

    Seems to me Fresno had issues with the short yellows. The contractor shortened the time of yellow and increased revenues to the city. The contractor was paid on a commission basis of collected revenues.

    If I have that incorrectly thought out, somebody jump in and correct. My memory is good, its just short.

    Vick

    corrected backward pasting.
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2006
  11. gometika

    gometika Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    31
    Location:
    Kalifornistan
    Same exact thing happened here in San Diego, **********. At first, a few years ago, when they installed the cameras, the yellow lights operated the way they've been operating, the duration and all for a few months. Then after a few months the yellow lights didn't last as long as they used to and a lot of drivers (who've gotten to the yellow light duration before) were getting their licences taken by the cameras and getting tickets thru the mail. Consumer groups took the city and private company responsible for the cameras to court, long months of hearing, finally it was found out somebody or bodies admitted the duration for the yellow lights were made to become shorter and shorter so as to increase revenue=profits for the company and city.

    So the big picture actually is that those cameras are really for $$$$$. All the big hoopla about the SAFETY that it'll provide is just a facade to cover the real intentions of politicians. Cities and state govts are in a bind on where to generate more income and they will try to get it everywhere and anywhere they can under the guise of legality and authority.

    Beware America on whom you vote for public office, they could be the proverbial wolf in sheep's clothing. Do they want that job to serve the public or do they want it for the public to serve them?
     
  12. RFM

    RFM Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2006
    Messages:
    39
    I don't mind cameras in public that much, just as long as they stay out of my house. If a friend of mine borrows my car and I end up paying for a ticket that wasn't my fault, I'm sure any friend of mine would just reimburse me.

    Please, don't judge all red light runners too harshly. After all, I've run some red lights in my day. Usually because I was about to poop my pants :eek:
     
  13. redranger1

    redranger1 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    Messages:
    343
    Location:
    Iberia, MO

    then poop yer pants pal. its fella like you who think thay can race a red light that has caused this problem and many accidents to the innocent.

    and welcome to thr.
     
  14. Lucky

    Lucky Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2005
    Messages:
    2,919
    Location:
    Calgary, near Rocky Mountains - Canada
    [​IMG]

    But in reality it's the slippery sloope. When they started putting cameras in England I doubt they proposed to cover everything at once, probably just intersections and stuff. Then you add a few more, and a few more, until you have every single street watched by cameras.

    I'd support anyone who chooses to fight the cameras - but I'd suggest that you will get more done if you just start a petition, than if you shoot them.
     
    Last edited: Feb 18, 2006
  15. Kramer Krazy

    Kramer Krazy Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2004
    Messages:
    925
    Location:
    Easley, SC
    Lights Are Regionally Different

    Red-light runners are so bad in the South (especially South Carolina), that they put a several-second delay between the one light running red and the other light turning green. There seems to be very little enforcement, and because of all the accidents, they just make these delays longer (I've seen them up to 3-4 secdonds). Matter of fact, the yellow lights seem a bit longer, too, as a trip a few years ago to through New York proved....

    A buddy of mine and I were riding our Harleys up the east coast, into Canada, around Lake Erie, and back home. We got forced by heavy traffic to take the tunnel to Manhatten from the Intersate, and pulled over to find a route to get back on track. When we started back on our way, we came upon a light that just turned yellow, so......naturally, we knew we had enough time to make it through the light because of the short distance we had to cover. I be a :cuss: ......that yellow was only about two seconds long and the other light immediately turned green as we were right in the middle of the intersection. :banghead: From that point on during this trip, we stopped for the yellow lights.
     
  16. XD_fan

    XD_fan Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2005
    Messages:
    210
    Location:
    Missouri
    Its all about the revenue. I read an article on their use in the Phoenix area. The accident rate at some of the lights with cameras actually went up. Sorry, but I don't have a reference.

    Years ago when I lived in LA for a while I was leaving from the job site in Pasadena I was a pretty bizarre incident due to this silly things. The car next to me was a Beemer and the guy in it was putting on a Bozo the Clown wig and Big Red rubber nose. I was watching him and rolled the window to ask what he was doing. Seems he was running late and knew he'd get a camera ticket or two. And yes, he was a lawyer. :neener:
     
  17. redbearde

    redbearde Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2006
    Messages:
    78
    Location:
    East TN
    They've done it across NC for a few years now. When revenue stops flowing as quick, they reduce the yellow light time.

    Go to eBay. Search for "photo" and "license plate" and "cover" or some variation thereof. Purchase one if you're really concerned about it.

    Apply the plastic cover to your license plate. Strictly speaking, this might be illegal if your point is to obscure your plate, but I've been pulled over a few times since I got one, and the cops haven't squawked about it yet (from directly behind, it's perfectly legible - from an angle...not quite so). And if they do, well, a $20 cover is cheaper than the photo ticket.

    a plate with MWMWMWMW or YVYVVYVY is fairly unreadable from any distance over a few yards.

    =)

    Good luck with your driving.
     
  18. gunsmith

    gunsmith member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2003
    Messages:
    5,906
    Location:
    Reno, Nevada
    it's all about control and revenue

    some cities have "traps" long strecthes of road with stop signs ...then finally a red light, you treat it like a stop sign because you just went thru 50 of them.

    in Reno they don't time the lights, it's really aggravating and hard on your breaks.

    anal retentive controlling leads to open rebellion, those stupid cameras never increase safety..cause more accidents then they stop, and are "timed" to legally rob people....

    I went thru a red light in SF, CA after coming to a complete stop and looking both ways, a cop stopped me and asked why I did it and I told him "I didn't see any cops":evil:
    I got away with a warning and made them laugh....

    cops have discretion, those camara's are too big brother for me.
     
  19. Tropical Z

    Tropical Z Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Messages:
    1,552
    Location:
    The path less chosen...
    EXACTLY
    These cameras are communism.Ill take my chances with getting a ticket for a filthy plate that cant be read before I let one of those rotten cameras get me!:cuss:
     
  20. Thalinor

    Thalinor Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Messages:
    23
    Location:
    Connecticut
    The way they work it here in CT is whoever the car is registered to gets the ticket, if they were not driving the car at the time of the ticket they tell them who was, and then that person gets the ticket. I remember reading some where that if they can't show the face of the person and you can't remember who was driving, then by law the ticket is null. Don't quote me on that but i think they have to show the drivers face unless you admit to the ticket or tell them who was driving and they then admit to the ticket.


    Simple solution? Why not just avoid running red lights? I would save my breath for something that is more important like how our president has investments in oil and last quarter the oil companies made the highest profits in the history of oil companies... despite the "oil shortage". To me, that’s something to argue about.



    Just my 2 copper
     
  21. aufevermike

    aufevermike Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Messages:
    178
    Location:
    Kenai Peninsula, Alaska
    They tried that in Anchorage, Alaska...... It didn't last very long though:)
     
  22. redranger1

    redranger1 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    Messages:
    343
    Location:
    Iberia, MO
    its not about trying to run red lights w/o gettin caught. its about the government assuming ones guilt just because one owns something that was misused illegally and not having any proof of who perpetrator is.

    and last i checked it isnt illegal fer the president to own investments. and if you had a lick of sense youd understand why the oil companies made record profits. in fact ill educate you. oil companies sell thier fuel on certain percentage over what they have in it. there for as the amount of money invested in the product goes up so does the amount of profit. very simple ecomomics my friend. and i find it outrageous that the democrats and some republicans think they have a right to any more of that profit then they already take just because they do extra well. how arrogant and self rightious!
     
  23. 308win

    308win Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2003
    Messages:
    2,918
    Location:
    Ohio - The Heart of it All
    I am far from a Bush fan but I don't see how you can hang this on him or anyone other than the City fathers of Colombia. This is happening everywhere.
     
  24. ArmedBear

    ArmedBear Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    23,171
    Here's the problem. We had it here in San Diego.

    They set up cameras and they changed the light timing so they'd catch a lot of people who did nothing wrong. A private contractor (Lockheed) did this.

    There are a lot of variables and judgment calls involved in giving out a red light ticket, as a cop will tell you. Cameras don't see anything but your car. They don't see the kid in the road you were stopping to avoid, or the erratic driver who cut you off in the intersection.

    Furthermore, the statistics say that, where cameras have been installed, there are fewer t-bone accidents from red light runners, but there are more rear-end accidents because people going through these intersections don't make judgments based on safety, just the camera. And that's when there ISN'T corruption like we had here.

    In sum, this is a revenue-generating Big Brother scheme, not a public safety initiative.
     
  25. gc70

    gc70 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    Messages:
    2,991
    Location:
    North Carolina
    safety is the excuse - money is the motive

    Stop light cameras were installed selectively where I live, with the stated purpose of reducing wrecks and increasing safety. The first cameras went up at interesections with the largest number of accidents (the only statistic that might indicate people were running red lights). Soon, cameras went up at other intersections, but that stopped when the "return" on additional cameras got too low.

    After the city ran out of lucrative intersections, they started a program of speeding cameras, because driving too fast causes accidents. That program will also plateau when it reaches the "profit point" of the cameras.

    BTW, a private company provides the cameras, processes the film, and issues the tickets. The company keeps a majority of the revenues, but the city gets a lucrative slice of the action. I guess that I should be proud that someone came up with a private enterprise solution to law enforcement, but I'm not.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page