Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

To Protect and Serve, or to Serve and Protect?

Discussion in 'Legal' started by XDn00b101, Jan 19, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. XDn00b101

    XDn00b101 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    68
    When I see Police cars that say "To Protect and Serve" and hear cops say it, I wonder if that's really correct? Is their primary function to protect human life, or to enfore law? What's more important to them?
     
  2. Optical Serenity

    Optical Serenity Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2005
    Messages:
    737
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    Its really more "Serve & Protect." I don't really know any police department that has a goal to protect the public, so much as serve it. Every dept I've been involved with makes it a point to serve the public, before even enforcing the law. Sometimes you have to enforce the law, sometimes a report is sufficient, and many times simple officer presence works too.

    There are many functions of law enforcement that the typical citizen does not see, and really, the better a dept functions, the less you will see / know what they do.

    I've never seen a dept that tells us, the officers, that we have to lock people up everyday. Most depts these days are all about fixing the situation, or leaving it better than we found it.

    There are times I go a week without making an arrest, and sometimes I can't go more than 4 hours without making an arrest.
     
  3. joab

    joab Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    4,830
    Location:
    Ocoee, Fla
    The primary duty of the police is to investigate crimes and arrest criminals according to the supreme court.

    They have no duty to protect any one.
    Arresting criminals and investigating crimes I suppose could be considered serving the public.
    Plus many other extra curricular programs that they are not duty bound to do
     
  4. XDn00b101

    XDn00b101 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    68

    Wow!:uhoh:
     
  5. GoBrush

    GoBrush Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2005
    Messages:
    266
    Location:
    The Good Ole USA
    99% of the time their function is to serve they are to far away and to late to protect thats why all of us good citizens should have firearms of our own to protect ourselves. Hopefully when they show up to pick up the pieces it is someone elses pieces and not the Good Guys. May the Good Guys always win the fight!
     
  6. Alex45ACP

    Alex45ACP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    1,464
    Location:
    USA
    More like "to collect and serve" :rolleyes:
     
  7. LAK

    LAK Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2004
    Messages:
    2,487
    PR phrase only. They are public servants, and in their capacities as investigative and custodial agencies they do serve the public. And they are responsible for the protection of persons in custody, evidence, and other things under various circumstances.

    But in the overall practical context they are not out there to protect anyone - their first responsibility being, and rightfully so, their own safety. Unfortunately their public service is largely hampered by being tasked with too many infraction rule offenses and other nonsense - and ultimately corruption at higher and political levels.
    --------------------------------------

    http://ussliberty.org
    http://ssunitedstates.org
     
  8. Thain

    Thain Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    704
    Location:
    Lansing, Michigan
    Courts have repeatedly found that the government is not liable for their failures to protect, and the Supreme Court has upheld every such case that came in front of them.

    Specifically, "A State's failure to protect an individual against private violence generally does not constitute a violation of the Due Process Clause, because the Clause imposes no duty on the State to provide members of the general public with adequate protective services." (See the Supreme Court decision Deshaney v. Winnebago City. Soc. Servs. Dept.)

    Heck, law enforcement can release violent suspects back into society (Pinder vs. Johnson (Maryland)), which may result in further mayhem (In the case of Pinder the deaths of three children), and officials have no responsibility for that negligence.

    Even worse, other jurisdictions have established the precedent that:
    "... a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any particular individual citizen..."
    [Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C. App.181)]

    In other words, the Courts backup a truth all of us know... Self-defense is your own responisbility. Not the cops, not your neighbors... Just ask Kitty Geneovse.
     
  9. El Tejon

    El Tejon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    18,085
    Location:
    Lafayette, Indiana-the Ned Flanders neighbor to Il
    The primary function of the police is to gather evidence for the prosecution.
     
  10. middy

    middy Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2004
    Messages:
    1,416
    Location:
    Texas
    They may not have an official duty to protect you, but the cops I know will protect you if they can, because they feel it is their duty whether the courts think so or not.

    Unfortunately, they can't be everywhere at once...
     
  11. jobu07

    jobu07 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2004
    Messages:
    1,980
    Location:
    Pike County, PA
    Yeah, it's my perception that most departments serve the purpose of investigating and solving crimes rather than preventing them. That's part of our rationale, as a group of second amendment enthusiasts, for daily carry and to look after ourselves.
     
  12. Lupinus

    Lupinus Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2005
    Messages:
    3,502
    Location:
    Upstate SC
    It is their duty to collect evidence and solve crimes. If possible to stop crime in the process and to protect people but that is something that simply can't happen and isn't their primary role.

    You're own safty is your own responsability, not the police. If they can great and I don't know of many police who would just walk by while you are getting your head kicked in. But it isn't their primary role and unrealistic to expect them to be there before you get hurt.
     
  13. made2cut

    made2cut Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Messages:
    178
    Location:
    St. Louis
    +1 Yeah my experience lately has been a lot more collecting than serving :mad: . Along with my two buddies, 9mm & 45acp, I can do my own protecting.
     
  14. TallPine

    TallPine Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    7,734
    Location:
    somewhere in the middle of Montana
    In this county, it seems like the sheriffs' primary duty is to serve papers as necessary ;)

    At least that is the primary reason that they ever leave the county seat, other than to drive the main highways once in a while. The deputies never come out to my neighborhood unless there is a specific reason: process service, 911 call, or wildfire evacuation. The SO has a contract with the county seat to provide police service (there is no city police) 24/7 and usually there is only one deputy on duty at a time. So you see where that leaves us :uhoh:

    Actually, it suits me just fine - for three minutes or thirty minutes, you are still pretty much on your own.
     
  15. TarpleyG

    TarpleyG Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    2,981
    Location:
    North Carolina
    In Texas, we had Constables in addition to the Sheriff's office that handled all that. I wonder if any other states are like that?

    Greg
     
  16. WT

    WT Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2003
    Messages:
    1,985
    To enforce the law - make arrests, issue citations, guarantee revenue for the city and employment for the prosecutors, judges, etc.

    See NYPD policy statement below:

    "Officers are reminded that failure to write the required amount of summonses and failure to make the required number of arrests for each rating period will result in substandard performance ratings and may result in poor annual performance evaluations." - Deputy Chief Michael Marino, 75th Precinct, NYPD - as quoted by the New York Post.

    Monthly quotas:
    4 parking violations
    3 moving violations
    3 quality of life summons
    1 arrest
    2 stop and frisks
     
  17. dolanp

    dolanp Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    944
    Location:
    Texas
    To serve when available with no obligation to protect. All rights reserved.
     
  18. Live Free Or Die

    Live Free Or Die Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2005
    Messages:
    254
    Location:
    PR of MD
    Where I live, the primary responsibilities of the police seem to be (in order of frequency):

    - Handing out speeding tickets
    - Making a report after a property crime
    - Sending that report to the local paper
    - Showing up after domestic dispute has concluded

    I honestly think there are far too many police officers in my county. I don't know how else to explain the 2-car speed traps every mile or two along some of the highways here. There are a handfull of property crimes each week -- almost all of which are never solved. The police force is too large, and it apparently relies on speeding tickets to pay for all the doughnuts. :neener: Joking aside, cops in my county have specific days each week when they go to court to testify against contested tickets. They earn time-and-a-half for the hours they're in court, so it seems like there's an institutional incentive to hand out a lot of speeding tickets.

    And while I'm ranting, it really irritates me that cops get away with breaking so many traffic laws -- doing exactly the kinds of things they hand out tickets for. Just about every day on my commute I witness a cop driving tens of mph over the limit, changing lanes without signaling, tailgating, passing on the right, and so on. Is it possible that some of them are responding to some sort of emergency? I suppose, but then why don't they turn their lights and sirens on?

    A co-worker's brother is a cop in my county, and he said that driving "as fast as I want" is an implicit "perk" of being in a position of power. It's exactly this attitude that reinforces my belief that, in many cases -- maybe even a majority of cases -- the kind of person who becomes a cop is the kind of person who desires power over others. Same with politicians. There must be some axiom that describes this elegantly.
     
  19. ball3006

    ball3006 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,874
    Location:
    Texas
    Gonzales vs Castle Rock.........

    rules that the police do not have the responsibility to protect individual citizens.............Police are mostly reactive, not proactive.........unless, you are a politician or wealthy.........chris3
     
  20. mercedesrules

    mercedesrules Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2003
    Messages:
    1,010
    Police are the enforcement arm of the state. Their only job is to protect and preserve the power of the state. Anything else they do is incidental to that purpose.
     
  21. LAK

    LAK Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2004
    Messages:
    2,487
    There should be substantial jail time for the public officials who implement or follow these kind of directives.
    ----------------------------------------------

    http://ussliberty.org
    http://ssunitedstates.org
     
  22. Steve in PA

    Steve in PA Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    2,571
    Location:
    NE PA
    Try not driving like an idiot and there won't be any "collecting" :rolleyes:
     
  23. JMusic

    JMusic member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,176
    Location:
    East Tennessee
    After seeing some of the things I saw in LE I sometimes thought there wasn't alot worth protecting. Sometimes when I read some of these threads the same thoughts cross my mind.
    Jim
     
  24. Car Knocker

    Car Knocker Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    3,809
    Location:
    Salt Lake City, UT
    Many years ago, when I lived in Northern California, I was served (twice) with paternity suits by the local Constable.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page