Tradition 1853 Enfield

Reenactments always only allow blanks! Live fire at a reenactment would draw only participants who were suicidal.
Truth. But I was not sure if Dave was speaking of a re-enactment, or one of the shooting matches. After re-reading, it does seem to be a re-enactment.
 
120 under a min-e-ay could be the heaviest recoil I've ever experienced. Don't ask me how I know that. Although, my five pound 12 gauge with 3" slugs might be the same.

Not the heaviest recoil I've experienced but the heaviest bp recoil I've experienced was 100 grains of powder under a .690 ball out of a 12 gauge that weighed less than 6 pounds. I didn't stop at one tho. :rofl:
 
Not the heaviest recoil I've experienced but the heaviest bp recoil I've experienced was 100 grains of powder under a .690 ball out of a 12 gauge that weighed less than 6 pounds. I didn't stop at one tho. :rofl:
Exactly. I fired more than a few of those 120 grain charges under a 500+ grain bullet. Had the bruises to prove it too. !!! I fire a .690" out of my long barreled double 12, over 110 grains. Not too bad. That weighs 7.5 pounds.
 
I've heard a ramrod go flying toward the Confederate troops at a reenactment. :rofl:
I read an account by a soldier, where he said that after they fired a volley at the "ramparts", or breast-works of the enemy, they were "bristling with ram-rods".
 
I've heard a ramrod go flying toward the Confederate troops at a reenactment.
When I was participating (1980's), ramrods were banned from the field. I was at an event when the "battle" was halted when a projectile was found embedded in a drum. It turned out to have been a ramrod tip that had broken off. Someone had violated the rule, taken his ramrod on the field, and had rammed a blank powder charge. He hadn't noticed that the tip had broken off. (Hence the reason for the rule.)
 
When I was participating (1980's), ramrods were banned from the field. I was at an event when the "battle" was halted when a projectile was found embedded in a drum. It turned out to have been a ramrod tip that had broken off. Someone had violated the rule, taken his ramrod on the field, and had rammed a blank powder charge. He hadn't noticed that the tip had broken off. (Hence the reason for the rule.)

I imagine the ramrod tip broke off on impact. I can't see any circumstance where a steel ramrod would break with blank cartridges or a live one for that matter.
 
I imagine the ramrod tip broke off on impact. I can't see any circumstance where a steel ramrod would break with blank cartridges or a live one for that matter.
Some reproduction CW ramrods have the tulip head silver-soldered on. I've seen them broken off.

If the whole ramrod had been fired out of the gun, it would have been noticed. If just the tip had been left in the bore, it might not have been noticed, and then it would have been fired like a bullet.
 
Truth. But I was not sure if Dave was speaking of a re-enactment, or one of the shooting matches. After re-reading, it does seem to be a re-enactment.
It was a reenactment. If our N-SSA guys had a "reenactment" it would be over pretty quick with no repeat performances.

Interesting thing about launching ramrods. Originals were a different metallurgy from the modern repops. An original that gets launched will bend into a spiral like a pig tail. Modern ones will just bend and kink in odd angles.
 
Interesting thing about launching ramrods. Originals were a different metallurgy from the modern repops. An original that gets launched will bend into a spiral like a pig tail. Modern ones will just bend and kink in odd angles.

Not a ramrod but I saw a bayonet rolled up like a tape measure once.
 
Some reproduction CW ramrods have the tulip head silver-soldered on. I've seen them broken off.
True. Most Brown Bess ramrod ends are a separate piece. My Armi-Sport 1861 ram-rod seems to be one piece, as far as I can tell.
 
Back
Top