Trash or Treasure : Ruger .44 Special & Long barrel Single Six.

Was your Single Six a convertible too?

Also, I agree about the loading/unloading being tedious. On the older examples, the loading gate does not time up with the charge holes- so you have you hold the cylinder with one hand while attempting to operate the ejector with the other. At some point in later production, they finally fixed that annoyance, but no one seems to know exactly what year the change occured.
It was a convertible model. It must have also been an older model because getting the spent rounds to eject was always a chore. I’m not sure I ever shot the magnum ammo through it as the price per round was more than shooting 9mm but only had marginally better ballistics out of the short barrel than .22 LR.
 
I have the blued brother to the six. It is a lights out shooter with mags, and it definitely holds its own with LR. I carry it squirrel hunting to give the kids a chance, and I still generally get the most. Of the pair, that six is the one I would be chasing the most, and hell or high water wouldn’t have stopped me from a 4473 on the spot. That stainless and gold is gorgeous and those grips are a great aesthetic touch for the stainless gun.
Lots of folks on both sides of the Single Six Convertible fence. Supposedly the difference in the bore is only .0005" but I think it just depends on how fresh the cutting head was when a particular barrel was made and ammunition variances.
Mine was a shotgun with any LRs, and decent, though not remarkable with Magnums.
Shame too, it WAS a beautifully made gun-
IMG_0425.jpg
 
Lots of folks on both sides of the Single Six Convertible fence. Supposedly the difference in the bore is only .0005" but I think it just depends on how fresh the cutting head was when a particular barrel was made and ammunition variances.
Mine was a shotgun with any LRs, and decent, though not remarkable with Magnums.
Shame too, it WAS a beautifully made gun-
View attachment 1260818
Honestly man, I think it has more to do with the stainless vs blued steel barrel. I've got a couple 5.5s, and the blued, a convertible, just walks the stainless, as far as I know, a LR only gun, shooting most types of 22lr ammo. The blued gun was dad's, and we shot quite a few CCI Maxi Mags thru it, but i really only shoot long rifle out of it anymore. I gotta say, it is extremely accurate with the lr cylinder, I'm almost as good as the Standard MKII Target.
Just a thought, as I had heard the convertible barrels were supposedly bigger,etc., or the longer (6.5")barrels were not as accurate. I dunno.
 
Lots of folks on both sides of the Single Six Convertible fence. Supposedly the difference in the bore is only .0005" but I think it just depends on how fresh the cutting head was when a particular barrel was made and ammunition variances.
Mine was a shotgun with any LRs, and decent, though not remarkable with Magnums.
Shame too, it WAS a beautifully made gun-
View attachment 1260818
It looks too good man! Crappy shooter or not! Beautiful Gun!
 
Honestly man, I think it has more to do with the stainless vs blued steel barrel. I've got a couple 5.5s, and the blued, a convertible, just walks the stainless, as far as I know, a LR only gun, shooting most types of 22lr ammo. The blued gun was dad's, and we shot quite a few CCI Maxi Mags thru it, but i really only shoot long rifle out of it anymore. I gotta say, it is extremely accurate with the lr cylinder, I'm almost as good as the Standard MKII Target.
Just a thought, as I had heard the convertible barrels were supposedly bigger,etc., or the longer (6.5")barrels were not as accurate. I dunno.
I’m glade you old timmers know all the in’s & out’s of these old guns! lost knowledge one day
 
I have a 5-1/2" 44 Special Blackhawk and it is a gem to shoot. I would not pass it up. There is something special about shooting 44 Special ammunition in a gun chambered for 44 Special.

My Single Six was purchased new in 1980 and is a blued convertible. It has a 6-1/2" barrel and has been more than accurate enough for my purposes with the 22 LR cylinder installed. I use the Single Six to dispatch some small critters around my hobby horse farm.

I probably have not fired a box of 22 Mag ammunition through it since I bought it.

A couple years ago, I got a couple S&W Model 48 revolvers (22 mag K-frame) and have stocked up on 22 Mag ammunition. Maybe I'll see what the Single Six can do with the 22 Mag cylinder installed.
 
Both would be screaming deals down here where the sun shines most of the time.

I am not sure about the convertible being less accurate because of it's slightly larger bore. I bought 3 screw single six before the conversion model came about and it's a pretty accurate little gun. A lot of prairiedogs and jackrabbits could testify to that except they are all dead. ;) I shied away from the new model because of the hype that they were not very accurate with 22LR because of the larger bore. A few years ago I finally threw in the towel and bought a barely fired stainless one that the serial number indicates was made in 1991. Bench resting both of them showed accuracy to be equal with 22 LR. To say I was pleasantly surprised is putting it mildly.

I no longer own a 44 special but my 44 mags seem to shoot them just as well as they did 44 mag and are a lot easier to find. Much easier on my hands and wrist too.
 
It's a good price for the Six, but my experience with an almost identical gun is that accuracy suffers when using the LR cylinder because the barrel is slightly overbored to accommodate the jacketed Magnum bullets.
If you're going to use it mainly as a Magnum, go for it. But mine was trash as a .22LR.
My super single six convertible shoots about the same sized groups with either cylinder, at least with me behind it.

 
Checking out the Sunny Day in Seattle, season depression is a real thing here. Especially when everyone is smiling from eye to eye when the Sun Comes out.

Anyways, my shop took these 2 in.

SO- TRASH OR TREASURE?
$360 for the Six
$460 for the .44 Special
original grey box + 90’s paperwork for both


View attachment 1260776View attachment 1260777View attachment 1260778View attachment 1260779View attachment 1260780View attachment 1260781View attachment 1260782

As always, the gun shop you go to seems to have prices stuck in the past.

That Single Six would easily be on the gun shop shelf for $700 plus in my part of the world.

Regarding accuracy, my blued "new model" Single Sixes with 4.6" and 9.5" barrels shoot very well with the pair of convertible cylinders each came with. Both guns needed a trigger job, and the chambers polished, but they shoot very nicely for a single action rimfire revolver.
 
As always, the gun shop you go to seems to have prices stuck in the past.

That Single Six would easily be on the gun shop shelf for $700 plus in my part of the world.

Regarding accuracy, my blued "new model" Single Sixes with 4.6" and 9.5" barrels shoot very well with the pair of convertible cylinders each came with. Both guns needed a trigger job, and the chambers polished, but they shoot very nicely for a single action rimfire revolver.
it’s a tactical shop, so there prices on modern stuff is slightly below retail. They take in a bunch of used stuff and really want to move it. Their used space is small, so floor plans are limited. They do good for both party's, sellers & buyers
 
it’s a tactical shop, so there prices on modern stuff is slightly below retail. They take in a bunch of used stuff and really want to move it. Their used space is small, so floor plans are limited. They do good for both party's, sellers & buyers
Must be something champion, cause last show I had my eye on a Blackhawk Bisley 44 Special, 5.5", no box, and the yayhooo wanted $850. Hard pass for sure, but $700 would be the range in this vicinity. If you can swing both, buy. That single six is priced very good, last 6.5" blued convertible i seen in a used case was $375. But definitely snap up that 44....if you end up hating it, you're making money on that deal
 
Back
Top