Quantcast

Type 99

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by xring3, Apr 16, 2019 at 5:39 PM.

  1. xring3

    xring3 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2008
    Messages:
    24
    Location:
    northwest Oklahoma
  2. xring3

    xring3 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2008
    Messages:
    24
    Location:
    northwest Oklahoma
    Bought this at a LGS about 3 weeks ago.
     
    LoonWulf and NIGHTLORD40K like this.
  3. someguy2800

    someguy2800 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2015
    Messages:
    4,651
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Wow, that’s an incredible find. Never seen one that nice.
     
    LoonWulf likes this.
  4. George Dickel

    George Dickel Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    582
    Location:
    Florida
    Very nice, especially with an intact chrysanthemum.
     
  5. NIGHTLORD40K

    NIGHTLORD40K Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2015
    Messages:
    3,199
    VERY nice, with Mum and anti-aircraft sight ears still intact! Even the stock is in good shape. Only thing its missing is the dust cover (and a bayonet, of course).

    The presence of an intact Mum means it was captured rather than surrendered, usually. One of the nicest Arisakas Ive seen in years, thanks for sharing!

    Ps- not that you will probably need to, but use caution if you sand the stock- the shellac they used is toxic if inhaled as dust!
     
    Shimitup, boom boom and LoonWulf like this.
  6. troy fairweather

    troy fairweather Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2018
    Messages:
    2,558
  7. bannockburn

    bannockburn Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    18,567
    xring3

    Very nice find, especially at your local gun shop! It's in great shape and still has the mum intact.

    There are a couple of schools of thought regarding the missing dust cover. Some believe that Japanese soldiers discarded them because they had a tendency to rattle somewhat, possibly giving away their position. Others have put forth the theory that American G.I.s, once they acquired a Japanese rifle, saw little value in the dust cover and simply took them off and threw them away.
     
    NIGHTLORD40K and LoonWulf like this.
  8. LoonWulf
    • Contributing Member

    LoonWulf Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2010
    Messages:
    7,592
    Location:
    Hawaii
    Nice early war Ari!
     
  9. NIGHTLORD40K

    NIGHTLORD40K Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2015
    Messages:
    3,199
    You have to remove the cover before the bolt, too, making cleaning a bit more tedious.

    Strangely, my T99 is beat to death, but still has a nice cover, lol.
     
  10. Shimitup

    Shimitup Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2009
    Messages:
    870
    Location:
    Houston
    Here's the data sheet on it if you don't already know the details.
    image006.jpg image008.jpg

    Very nice one BTW. If you can't read the sheet I'll see if I can provide the full size image.
     
  11. fpgt72

    fpgt72 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2011
    Messages:
    1,803
    Some info on the 99 in general......the OP's seems to be missing the mono pod as well. I like them, they are a little like the swiss army knife of guns....everything is hung off the thing.

    Now some "real" on the stupid dust cover.

    No the japanese did not remove them because they rattle....in most armies they tend to frown upon the rank and file tossing bits they don't want away. And they did not rattle if matched to the rifle....yes they are SN# to that gun. The japanese took great pride in their equipment....remember it is not theirs it belonged to GOD.....you know the skinny guy on the white horse in the photos.

    At the end of the war it was like most things....rifles in one pile, bolts in another, you want one go pick.

    Most battlefield pickups (intact mums for the most part) went back with GI Joe and they did what americans do.....they played with it, in our army we did not have that stuff, so big deal, just a nothing enemy rifle....some kept it, some did not....if....IF cleaned it was cleaned like all that stuff was, chuck it in a can of gas with your friends stuff and fish it out.....matching.....who cares, it is an enemy rifle, matching smatching.

    But no, they did not discard the covers, that would be frowned upon.
     
  12. NIGHTLORD40K

    NIGHTLORD40K Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2015
    Messages:
    3,199
    The lower band on the OPs gun doesnt have the monopod attachment point. As Shimitup's data sheet illustrates, they used many different band designs.
     
    theotherwaldo likes this.
  13. mushu

    mushu Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2019
    Messages:
    56
    i think it was the model 44 that had the bi pod i could be wrong, that is a nice jap. i had a good friend that like to customize japs, they were ugly compared to mausers, he used to buy for 30 bucks back in the 80's, 6.5 swedes for 75.00, 98 mauser's went for 125.00
     
  14. fpgt72

    fpgt72 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2011
    Messages:
    1,803
    As the war went forward they started to cut out the different things, AA sights might be useful when shooting at a Chinese biplane going 100mph, but a diving Corsair topping 400mph....a little pointless.....the mono pod went about the same time. Metal was one of those things that got hard to find in mid 40's Japan.

    Note on some 99's you will see the sight and it looks like the AA sights got broken off....if it is a later rifle chances are they never got installed, and they had piles of sights already laying around.
     
  15. Speedo66

    Speedo66 Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2008
    Messages:
    4,708
    Location:
    Flatlandistan
    I know very little about these Japanese rifles, but almost all of those I've seen seem to have a cracked stock. Were they a two piece stock, or did the design just tend to crack?
     
  16. someguy2800

    someguy2800 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2015
    Messages:
    4,651
    Location:
    Minnesota
    They were a two piece stock. That way the grain runs straight to the toe of the butt which makes it stronger for clubbing the enemies of the emperor.
     
    Merle1, NIGHTLORD40K and Speedo66 like this.
  17. NIGHTLORD40K

    NIGHTLORD40K Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2015
    Messages:
    3,199
    Two piece, however they are also prone to cracking across the wrist area where the wood is thin-
    16000753_2.jpg
    Mine has an identical "repair.":)
     
    Merle1 likes this.
  18. mokin

    mokin Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2007
    Messages:
    1,167
    Location:
    Western Colorado
    Neat rifle. Thanks for sharing.
     
  19. lionking

    lionking Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,981
    nice I have one similar and 10 years later never shot it yet, I need to sometime ammo is expensive though.

    024.jpg
    018.jpg
    026.jpg
     
  20. lionking

    lionking Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,981
    hope to hear how it shoots if you shoot it
     
  21. valleyforge.1777

    valleyforge.1777 Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2013
    Messages:
    69
    Not hard to reload ammo for the 7.7x58 Japanese.
     
    Steel Horse Rider likes this.
  22. Steel Horse Rider

    Steel Horse Rider Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    2,263
    Location:
    Loveland, Colorado
    Not hard to reload for the 6.5 either, but the Arasaka's tend to be hard on brass as the chambers are not as tight as most western made rifles.
     
  23. fpgt72

    fpgt72 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2011
    Messages:
    1,803
    Yea, if you can reload for 3006 you can manage this.

    I don't have a 6.5, but my 7.7 is not "hard on brass", not much of a resize is needed.....but again with 90% of my old guns I do load them on the soft side....really no need for ME to load them "normal", Even a softer load would be a good hunting load.

    I also reload a great deal of 6.5 Carcano, and those rifles get poo-pooed more than the japanese rifles....they are a weaker action than the japanese, but they are good rifles, and also not dangerous, in accurate, or any of that other elite american BS, German/american guns are the best...british are almost as good......France only dropped once garbage.

    So much just out and out incorrect info out there on a great deal of this stuff, that just hangs on and on....Now I am sure, the poster I quoted made the statement in good faith, but remember these are older rifles, and many of the "truths" we here come from people that had to experience the two way range and these things are on the other end.....so naturally they are going to be talked down, we also hear they are so bad we had to bore them out for 3006 to make them safe, shoot well....and who knows what other incorrect things have been said......these internet "truths" just keep getting past on and on.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice