gun-fucious
Member
The United Nations Conference on the Illicit
Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons – An
Encroachment on the Second Amendment to the
U.S. Constitution?
By Daniel B. Pickard
http://www.fed-soc.org/Intllaw& AmerSov/smallarms.pdf
V. Conclusion
The United States is a world leader in preventing the illegal trade in small arms and light
weapons, and appropriately supported the goals of the UN Conference on the Illicit Trade in
Small Arms and Light Weapons. However, it is clear that many delegates to the UN Conference
intended to expand the scope of the negotiations and would have preferred to restrict the rights of
private ownership of weapons, and to prevent the sales of such arms to non-State groups. Such
efforts, if successful, would have compromised American sovereignty.
When the follow-up conference to the Program of Action is convened sometime before
2006, the United States should remain vigilant in its opposition to any programs or treaties that
are incompatible with rights guaranteed under the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
The U.S. should not take any action that threatens rights guaranteed by the Second Amendment
in order to meet the worthy goals of the Conference. Indeed, the United States has already
implemented significant export controls that, if adopted by other nations, would be a significant
step forward in preventing the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons.
Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons – An
Encroachment on the Second Amendment to the
U.S. Constitution?
By Daniel B. Pickard
http://www.fed-soc.org/Intllaw& AmerSov/smallarms.pdf
V. Conclusion
The United States is a world leader in preventing the illegal trade in small arms and light
weapons, and appropriately supported the goals of the UN Conference on the Illicit Trade in
Small Arms and Light Weapons. However, it is clear that many delegates to the UN Conference
intended to expand the scope of the negotiations and would have preferred to restrict the rights of
private ownership of weapons, and to prevent the sales of such arms to non-State groups. Such
efforts, if successful, would have compromised American sovereignty.
When the follow-up conference to the Program of Action is convened sometime before
2006, the United States should remain vigilant in its opposition to any programs or treaties that
are incompatible with rights guaranteed under the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
The U.S. should not take any action that threatens rights guaranteed by the Second Amendment
in order to meet the worthy goals of the Conference. Indeed, the United States has already
implemented significant export controls that, if adopted by other nations, would be a significant
step forward in preventing the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons.