Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

U.S. Embassy in Iran and current armaments.

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by Glock22, Dec 21, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Glock22

    Glock22 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2006
    Messages:
    331
    Location:
    Idaho
    Back in the late 1970s when Iran took those hostages at the U.S. Embassy, did the Marine guard fight back against the attackers?
     
    Last edited: Dec 21, 2006
  2. MSgt B

    MSgt B Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Messages:
    196
    Location:
    VA
    You want someone to post (on a public forum) how many Marines guard each embassy and what weapons they have?

    Think about that for a minute.
     
  3. Glock22

    Glock22 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2006
    Messages:
    331
    Location:
    Idaho
    wow that does sound bad.
     
  4. MSgt B

    MSgt B Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Messages:
    196
    Location:
    VA
    Yeah, it does.

    No blood, no foul.
     
  5. Kali Endgame

    Kali Endgame member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2006
    Messages:
    516
    Location:
    In a constant state of confusion.
    Only the Master Chief guards the Embassy. And Chuck Norris' tears cure cancer. Seriously, if that information isn't available on Wiki, you must not have the need to know.
     
  6. Glock22

    Glock22 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2006
    Messages:
    331
    Location:
    Idaho
    Kali Endgame, all i did was ask a question you dont need to be rude about it.
     
  7. MatthewVanitas

    MatthewVanitas Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    3,462
    Location:
    Montreal, Québec
    I'm going from memory here, but IIRC the Marines at the Iranian Embassy in '79 were told to stand down against greatly superior numbers, rather than risk a full-on massacre of the civillian personnel they were responsible for. IIRC again, the focus was instead on buying time for the staff to destroy sensitive documents. Unfortunately, the staff only used a shredder, and the Iranian gov't later pieced together all the documents, published it in a huge 12-volume set, and sell it to this day at the site of the former embassy. The tranlated title is something like "The Nest of Spies Documents".

    There were only something like 66 Americans in the whole embassy (maybe a dozen Marines?), against 300 attackers from the Students of the Imam's Line radical organization, so there was really no chance that the Marines could have pressed the mob back, so it was best to negotiate to keep their charges safe.

    If someone else has a link to a good description of the event, that'd be great. I'll go glance around.

    -MV
     
  8. denfoote

    denfoote Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    4,622
    Location:
    Near the border of occupied Azlan and Mexico.
    Back then it would have been standard Corp issue: M16 and 1911A1.
    Embassy guards are the creme of the Corp.
    Not every Marine gets to be an Embassy guard.
    They get special training and security clearences.
    They are placed under the command of the Ambassador.
    I know a former guard who now is a team leader of the security force of a nuclear power plant. Really nice guy, but you wouldn't want to try to mess with him!! He's a Chuck Norris class vessel, if you catch my drift!!
     
  9. MatthewVanitas

    MatthewVanitas Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    3,462
    Location:
    Montreal, Québec
    So far as armaments: at the time of the Iranian Revolution, some of the embassy guards may have been carrying shotguns, or even revolvers.

    Revolvers were pretty common in embassy armories until relatively recently, so I have been told by Marine SNCOs who'd done embassy tours.


    -MV
     
  10. Glock22

    Glock22 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2006
    Messages:
    331
    Location:
    Idaho
    thank you for your answers.
     
  11. rwc

    rwc Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2005
    Messages:
    596
    Location:
    Bainbridge Island, WA
  12. stillamarine

    stillamarine Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2006
    Messages:
    32
    As well as UZIs. MSG (Marine Security Guard as they are known) still to this day has some detachments that have uzis. I'm sure they had some good ol trench guns and pistols.
     
  13. DMK

    DMK Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,797
    Location:
    Over the hills and far, far away
    Then there's that small nuclear device in the back room, just in case. ;)
     
  14. ilcylic

    ilcylic Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    1,002
    Location:
    Desert Southwest, USA
    I sure hope not, since that would strongly imply that Iran now posesses one. :neener:
     
  15. Frog48

    Frog48 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2006
    Messages:
    2,201
    Location:
    Somewhere down in Texas
    They didnt have an incinerator? I'm sure that soon became a standard item in embassies thereafter.
     
  16. txgho1911

    txgho1911 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2004
    Messages:
    973
    Location:
    Indiana;
    Where would we be today?

    If Tehran was nuked after that initial attack. Maybe following a public announcement for non combatants to evacuate the city.
     
  17. MatthewVanitas

    MatthewVanitas Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    3,462
    Location:
    Montreal, Québec
    International pariahs.

    Plus the families of the 66 hostages would have sued the everloving snot out of the US gov't.

    Plus it would have made the Marine expedition to (Shiite-majority) Lebanon ever so much more fun than it was already.




    Nevermind, you're right, it would have brought peace to the Middle East. Solid call.

    -MV
     
  18. justashooter

    justashooter member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2003
    Messages:
    366
    Location:
    luoyang, PRC
    embassy marines here in beijing have beretta 92 sidearms, and you occasionally see M16. chinese PLA keep the riffraff out of embassy row. they have 762X25 subguns.
     
  19. ChestyP

    ChestyP Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Messages:
    312
    Location:
    Bellevue, WA
    At the time of the takeover,

    the standard sidearm of MSGs was the .38 revolver (S&W Victory Models or newer Ruger Service Sixes). Very few MSG detachments had long guns of any kind. Even when the Saigon embassy was attacked in Tet 1968, most of the responding Marines carried .38s only.

    The State Department is in overall charge of embassy security procedures and decisionmaking. The Marines do what they are told. And the State Department tends to prefer nonviolent responses to violence.

    Without going into any detail, MSG detachments today are better trained and better armed. Whether they are allowed to use those arms is not up to them.



    Former MSG with extensive mid-east travel experience
     
  20. txgho1911

    txgho1911 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2004
    Messages:
    973
    Location:
    Indiana;
    Mathew,
    I am just wondering out loud. I think i was 6 or 7 when the hostages where taken. Must have been the flags displayed inside of the church I attended regular that made me as aware of the matter at all. I do not recall any other event so well known of untill the barracks in Lebanon.
    How many other pieces of American territory or assets would not have suffered harm with a swift expanse of glass to prove retaliation as a fact.

    to add: Why are so many English and other coalition countries hosts to Iranian Embassies?
     
  21. Pumpkinheaver

    Pumpkinheaver Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2003
    Messages:
    1,255
    Location:
    missouri
    12 Marines against 300 "Students" sounds like the odds are about even to me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:D
     
  22. slzy

    slzy Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2005
    Messages:
    872
    what penalties go along with being an international pariah?
     
  23. telomerase

    telomerase Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2003
    Messages:
    3,255
    Location:
    The bear-infested hills of Grafton NH
    If you mean a US-funded "pariah" like North Korea, the penalty is on the people: they can never get rid of "their" government.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page