Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

UK police don't carry guns, are assaulted

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by Robert Hairless, Apr 2, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Robert Hairless

    Robert Hairless Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2003
    Messages:
    3,983
    Neither the police nor ordinary citizens in the United Kingdom are allowed to carry guns for their own protection. Much to their surprise the police of South Wales are discovering that bad people try to hurt them and often succeed.

    Note the last sentence of this article that just appeared in icWales: “It is the law of the jungle out there ...." The South Wales police want to address the problem with a simplified reporting system because the current system discourages reports by police officers who have been assaulted. The actual number of assaults on police is presumed to be much larger.

     
  2. Irwin

    Irwin Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2006
    Messages:
    142
    Location:
    Fife,Scotland
    Where in the article does it mention that if the police or citizens had the right to carry firearms would they be safer? Would you really find it acceptable for a police officer to shoot someone who was a little agressive? I think you will also find in the usa that police officers are assaulted on a day to day basis, it may be that alot of these assaults are from when someone has spat on them pushed them generally could just be very minor things that get reported. Do you really think they youth of today would suddenly give more respect to police officers if they carried guns? Irwin
     
  3. mike101

    mike101 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2006
    Messages:
    1,443
    Location:
    SOUTH Jersey
    "I think you will also find in the usa that police officers are assaulted on a day to day basis, it may be that alot of these assaults are from when someone has spat on them pushed them generally could just be very minor things that get reported. Do you really think they youth of today would suddenly give more respect to police officers if they carried guns? Irwin"

    You're damned right they would, Irwin. I live near Philadelphia. If I spat on a Philly cop, or put my hands on him, I would expect a night-stick accross the side of my head, and a subsequent arrest, at least. If I threatened the officer with a weapon, I would expect to be shot.

    I use Philly cops as an example, because they are notoriously serious. But the same thing goes for any town in this country, even the tiny little one-horse town I grew up in. You don't assault cops in the US, if you have all of your marbles. Period.

    And I have no problem with that.

    Irwin, I saw a graph from the British Home Office a couple of weeks ago. I will try to find the link. Regardless, the chart showed a sharp increase in violent crime in the UK, from 1997 when the gun ban went into effect, to the present. I also read that there is a movement among British law-makers that is advocating for the right of criminals to be protected from physical violence when they break into someone's home. Are they putting something in the water over there?

    In England, they banned guns. Now they have had to ban pocket knives and swords. There is proposed legislation to ban larger cooking knives. Now, to thwart all of the security cameras all over cities like London, the miscreants have taken to wearing hooded garments. So of course, the Brits are now talking about banning hoods. What's next, eating utensils? Pointy sticks?

    http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/...-hood-for-good

    Soon, they will be eating their kidney pie off of the floor, because the shards from broken dinner plates are deadly weapons.
     
  4. doubleg

    doubleg Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2006
    Messages:
    1,225
    The first and only time I was arrested I was about 14 and was scared sh*tless. I remember it like it happened yesterday. I was standing behind a store with my buddies and there had been reports of people spraying graffiti in the area. So a police officer in a squad car pulls up and decides he has the right to search all of us for no reason with out charging us or calling our parents. I remember when he was putting the cuffs on me I was in shear panic. I thought about every possible way to escape. But before I could do anything stupid I noticed the Glock on his hip and I came back to reality. If that cop didn't have a gun I WOULD have tried to get away. BTW charges dropped, illegal search and seizure :neener:.
     
  5. Robert Hairless

    Robert Hairless Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2003
    Messages:
    3,983
    There's no need to be defensive, Irwin. The article is what it is, and so is my brief introduction to it. Not everyone in the United States knows that the police in the UK are unarmed. I think that information is necessary context to the article. You obviously don't think so. But I think so and it was I who posted the article.

    You also don't seem to think that the number of such assaults on the South Wales police is unacceptably high or that it's a significant indicator of a very big problem. But they do, and so does the author of that article. You consider the problem to be relatively minor but for them it as a sign that orderly civilization has disintegrated and that “It is the law of the jungle out there ...."

    Of course it's possible that your view is more reasonable than theirs, and that assaults on the police are routine bits of unpleasantness that have no special significance. But South Wales police officers don't think so, and neither does the author of that article, and they're especially disturbed that the number of these incidents have increased. No offense intended but as someone with no direct experience of the situation but possessed of a functioning mind I give more weight to people who presumably know something about the matter. I'll cast my lot with them.

    You also don't think there's a connection between the disproportionate number of such incidents or their rise with the inability of the UK police to have the means to defend themselves against superior force. There you're obviously not alone. As you said, the article does not make that connection and neither do the police who made the statements quoted in it. You don't see a possible connection, nor can I see that they do either.

    And perhaps there's the problem. You, and the police, and the writer of that article don't see what seems plain as the nose on your face to me. Like the police, you accept it as not an unusual part of the police officer's job "to be butted or to have their nose broken." What's a routine part of life in your frame of reference is appalling to me and not something I accept with your equanimity. The police don't share your stolid acceptance of their beatings of course, but I bet that's because it's their noses at risk and not yours, and yet you're all remarkably tolerant of such things.

    Although you and--for the purposes of that article, and much more significantly--they don't see the connection I've made, it's not original with me. Law enforcement officers and other professionals on this side of the Atlantic Ocean do see that connection and can't understand what's wrong with you people to accept such situations. (I don't think they have you in mind specifically, Irwin, so please don't take it as a personal insult.)

    In fact I was directed to that article by a message thread in the 10-8 Forum for people with a professional interest in these matters. The thread was begun by a Deputy Sheriff in the U.S. who entitled it "ARE THEY STILL NOT CARRYING FIREARMS?????" I think that the extreme capitalization and disbelief reflect the Deputy Sheriff's negative opinion of what you and the South Wales police and the article writer don't even see. Read that brief thread and you shouldn't have much difficulty seeing the contempt for that situation shared by other professional law enforcement officers such as a Detective Sergeant and a Department of Energy security officer. Me too by the way.

    The opinion of John Farnham, a noted and very well respected instructor in the United States, seems to shed light on your position and that of your law enforcement establishment:

    I think Mr. Farnham is implying that the empire has no clothes. If you're representative of the citizenry in the United Kingdom, the citizens won't demand a change because they're quite content with the situation as it is thank you.

    Oh. No, I wouldn't "really find it acceptable for a police officer to shoot someone who was a little agressive" and I didn't say so and didn't suggest any such thing. Nor did I say that police officers in the United States are free from assaults. I didn't make such extreme and extremely foolish statements. But I can't see the situation described by P.C. Bennett as "a little agressive":

    If that's what a Scotsman considers "a little aggressive" I wonder why anyone even cares that Macbeth hath murdered sleep.
     
  6. Irwin

    Irwin Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2006
    Messages:
    142
    Location:
    Fife,Scotland
    Robert I dont see 395 assaults in 1 year and 5 months exceptionally high essespially in an area the size of south wales. That boils down to 23 a month thats less than 1 a day, when you break it down into what actually happened ie in this whole period there was 23 bites , 18 broken bones and 28 laserations. So if we take these as the worst kinds of attacks thats 69 assaults out of 395 which were violent and that only breaks down to 4 a month so the figurs arnt as bad as they claim and most if not all will be accountable to drink or drugs.

    They do have the means they all carry battons or asps and also have been trained how to use them, unless they are up against being shot at every day then why should they carry guns? Why should the police be aloud to but not the ordinary citizens?

    Just because my nose isnt on the line doesnt mean that im not willing to take that risk if i wasnt joining the army I would have been joining the police, its just living over here and speaking to real police officers you can have a look at the situation diffrently, the police officers I know are very happy about not carring a gun and i wouldnt be to supprised if there is alot of police officers in south wales who would not like to be armed. What you have to take into account is that the attitude over hear to guns is vastly diffrent to over there its a case of apple and oranges to compair both our police forces its a diffrent political situation. Irwin


    p.s Im not a scotsman Im British :D
     
  7. Beagle-zebub

    Beagle-zebub Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,482
    Location:
    Moscow, Russia
    I second mike101's comments. American cops, for better or for worse, do not let people push them around physically in the least--I figure that a big reason for this is that they feel that their individual leniency would contribute to perps seeing all cops' thresholds for abuse as being higher, leading to more attacks. (An economist might think that's counterintuitive, but it makes certain sense given the line of work.) I suspect that the kind of people who self-select to become cops in America are a different breed, if not species, than their UK counterparts, in part because of a vast difference in the two countries' attitudes towards public service.
     
  8. Focke-Wolf

    Focke-Wolf Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2008
    Messages:
    59
    British cops didn't carry guns even in the days when carry of guns were full well legal (pre 60s I believe). Although they could carry at their wish IIRC.
     
  9. #shooter

    #shooter Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2006
    Messages:
    606
    Location:
    Indiana
    one word

    Taser.

    i am not sure if the UK allows it, but it is a great compliance tool that is sometimes use too much (traffic stops???) But is it the best non-lethal tool for defense against assaults (w/o a deadly weapon).
     
  10. Focke-Wolf

    Focke-Wolf Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2008
    Messages:
    59
    They carry CS spray and a baton. To my knowledge, Tasers are only issued to Firearms response unit. I heard some non-FRU carrying them though.
     
  11. doc2rn

    doc2rn Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2006
    Messages:
    3,495
    Location:
    SW Florida
    C.S.S. Gun Free Zones
    No Choice= No Chance
     
  12. Cromlech

    Cromlech Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2006
    Messages:
    695
    Location:
    England, U.K.
    Not that this has any real worth in mentioning, I am willing to bet that a lot of those 'bites, lacerations, grazes, and scratches' are from rowdy and drunk women. Some of them are terrible.
     
  13. Titan6

    Titan6 member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,745
    Location:
    Gillikin Country
    The criminals will not respect, fear maybe. The non-criminal youth might respect the police more unless the people on Airstrip1 respect the police more for taking a whipping. (not sure what that says about the culture if so).

    It is really a matter of degrees, with the results being the same. The murder rate per person in England and Wales has doubled since 1983 (25 years) and nearly tripled since 1970. For a society that has "lost it's warrior class" it sure is becoming more violent.

    Maybe this is not so much an issue of losing a warrior class so much as that class has changed sides...

    http://sasi.group.shef.ac.uk/publications/2005/shaw_tunstall_dorling_murder_corrected.pdf
     
  14. Robert Hairless

    Robert Hairless Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2003
    Messages:
    3,983
    I don't see 395 assaults as excessive either, Irwin, if none of them are on me. I'm truly an agreeable person and much more tolerant than anyone else seems to believe: since you don't seem to mind, it would be okay with me if you are the victim of all 395 assaults.

    So we see things with remarkable similarity. As long as it's not our noses being broken and we aren't sent to the hospital by hoodlums, 395 assaults on the South Wales police are acceptable to both of us. In fact I am such a nice guy that it wouldn't bother me if all 3,000 members of that police force got their teeth kicked in several times a day. That wouldn't hurt. What would hurt very badly is if someone even stepped on one of my toes. Yours too I think. We're in agreement: what happens to us is important but what happens to them is part of their job and they need to stop their bellyaching. You and I together are shaking hands across the sea. Let the word go forth that we have begun world peace in our time.

    The trouble is that the South Wales police federation just isn't as gracious as we are about their noses and ribs. This is their failing, of course, but I didn't chose them so it's not my fault. I am glad, though, that a lot of those police officers don't want to be armed. This is wonderful of them because every society needs to provide outlets for its aggressive, dangerous people and any police officer who would choose to be a punching bag over defending his own person as a matter of political, ethical, moral, or social choice I admire that officer greatly. In fact I would prefer to have the hell kicked out of such a wonderful person instead of awful me. It's better for the criminals too. They get to exercise themselves on a better class of person.

    As you probably know, there also are many people in the U.S. who don't want to have the means of defense against overwhelmingly superior force. It might surprise you to know that I support them completely. They don't want to have firearms and I don't want them to have firearms either. I am adamantly and implacably opposed to forcing them to carry guns, and I don't think they should be forced to defend their own lives either. Or the lives of their children. What might surprise you even more is that I rather like having such people around. The U.S. and the U.K. are not so far different that we should abandon or discourage a class of easy victims. Where our ways part, however, is that I don't want to be in that class of easy victims and I rather like having my children alive. Think of it as one of my eccentricities. So I don't want to be forced into that class of easy victims. Really, my inclusion would lower its tone dramatically. I don't even see why they would want me among them.

    I do "take into account is that the attitude over hear to guns is vastly diffrent to over there its a case of apple and oranges to compair both our police forces its a diffrent political situation," which is why I introduced the article as I did.

    But then you picked on me for doing it, which is how we met. I can't seem to satisfy you, Irwin.

    By the way, from my point-of-view what you call "over here" and "over there" are ass backwards. It's quite the opposite from where I am. That statement is both philosophical and geographical. :)
     
  15. Irwin

    Irwin Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2006
    Messages:
    142
    Location:
    Fife,Scotland
    Robert sorry if i appeared to have picked on you all I was doing was providing a counter arguement, if you dont like this then posting on a discussion forum is the wrong place, what good is a discussion if its one sided? You dont seem to have grasped what was writin in my posts, when you look at the assaults as a whole they look bad but then you have to take the results and look at each case induvidually then tell me how many times a police officer has been kicked unconscious by youths, probably not alot I bet you more doctors and nurses are assaulted on a friday and saturday night over the same period than the police that is a far more greater problem. Unfortunetly it wont be solved with firearms. Robert I can tell you this as a just about 18 yearold I would fear nor respect the police anymore than I allready do if they started carring guns and im a general well behaved youth, think about your not so well behaved ones. The only real foreseeableway i can think of which would slow down the amounts of assaults on police officers were to change political parties and to give back both the citizens and the police there rights. Irwin
     
  16. woodybrighton

    woodybrighton member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Messages:
    791
    Location:
    BRIGHTON
    if you spend a lot of time dealing with drunk people your going to get smacked
    occasionally:mad:
    lethal force isn't really going to help in incidents like that
    cs tasers and a baton will
     
  17. Shadow1198

    Shadow1198 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2007
    Messages:
    206
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    [rant]
    The police and officers are supposed to be a symbol and tool of ORDER. How do they maintain order? Ultimately with the threat of force. While this doesn't necessarily apply to every situation, every traffic stop, or what have you there is always the threat of force there with police in America. Please don't mistake what I'm saying, I have great respect for LEO's in this country (USA) and am not saying they always use force. I am simply saying, with all the "tools" on their duty belt, civilians here ALL have an unspoken understanding that if you act up, become hostile/belligerent then you will suffer some repercussions. Those repercussions include physical restraint, being smacked upside your head with a billy club/asp, mase/cs/pepper spray in the face, being tased, or as a last resort being shot and possibly killed. Let me say again, I am NOT implying that police here are always looking to use force, I am simply stating that they have options when the situation is warranted to use appropriate levels of force to subdue or restrain you. That doesn't always deter lunatics or sociopaths....or idiots. However, for the most part I would say a majority of people do NOT want to be punched or beat in the face with an asp. The majority of people do not want to feel like choking half to death while crying a river after being maced in the face. The majority of us will probably never know the feeling of and likely never want to experience the feeling of tens of thousands of volts rushing through your body via a taser. And, except for a select few crazy/suicidal/homicidal individuals I think almost ALL of us would really prefer not to be shot and killed. It is that basic logic for self preservation and knowing that the cop's will plain and simple beat/mase/tase/shoot your @ss if you get out of hand that causes a majority of sensical individual's and our society as a whole to give LEO's the respect they deserve............................................................................

    This basic logic and lack of presence of these tools is no longer present in the UK, at least not in an effective manner. Citizens there obviously know it and generally seem to show quite a bit less respect to LEO's there accordingly. By the pure fact alone that criminals still obtain guns in the UK illegally, officers there should be armed accordingly. How can you expect the police force in a country to garner any respect when it's average officer could possibly get their @ss kicked by the average teenager with no fear. The UK needs a reverse vasectomy to gain it's balls back. With what has been happening over there, your officers and the police seem to have no respect from the population in general. Here in America our LEO's kick @ss and we respect them for it. ;) [/rant]
     
  18. Scanr

    Scanr Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2006
    Messages:
    347
    Location:
    Nevada
    The last comments I made about England were a contributing factor in the thread just disappearing.
     
  19. Intune

    Intune Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,305
    Location:
    On Old Hickory Lake near Nashville TN
    Dang, one can "deem" all of the "un' & dis's" words they care to and they aren't going to avert violence.
    "Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries.
    Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time."

    Aww, you got me copper, I surrender...

    The law of the jungle clearly states in section .460; subsection Weatherby Magnum, that unless one is armed with deadly fangs, incredible claws, fleet of foot, poisonous toxins or tremendous size & strength, one should only venture out into said jungle with as much firepower as one "deems" sufficient! ;)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page