Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Underwater gun question (from movie)

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by Red Dragon, Dec 27, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Red Dragon

    Red Dragon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    381
    Location:
    Petersburg, Michigan
    I was watching Lethal Weapon 4 the other day and at the end Mel Gibson's character shoots Jet Li's character with an AK-47 while underwater. My question is, would a weapon fire a single shot let alone full auto underwater?
     
  2. mbs357

    mbs357 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2004
    Messages:
    1,621
    Location:
    Vienna, VA
    I'm leaning to an AK-47 not being able to do much underwater.
    *shrug*
     
  3. jdberger

    jdberger Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2005
    Messages:
    309
    There was a MythBusters a while back that was about shooting guns into water, most of the faster bullets disintigrated.

    Of course, that assumes that there is enough oxygen in the case to make the powder burn...
     
  4. jashobeam

    jashobeam Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    Messages:
    229
    Location:
    San Jose, CA
    My Glock 17 can

    Before I bought my Glock (14 years ago) I had read that it could be fired under water. The article said that when fired from a depth of about 3' under water, the 9mm bullet would travel about 10' IIRC.

    Anyway, one time when I was out backpacking I stuck the pistol under water and fired off a shot. I held it with my left (weak) hand because I was afraid that something might go wrong and blow my fingers off. The gun fired and cycled normally. I had only brought target ammo, no hollow-points. I think that HP's might not be good to fire under water as they could possibly expand while still in the barrel :eek: ! I had not considered this at the time, but am thankful that I hadn't brought any HP's with me, as I probably wouldn't have realized the possible danger.

    Can anyone confirm or refute the danger of in-barrel hollow-point expansion? (I don't mean to hijack the thread.)
     
  5. TheArchDuke

    TheArchDuke Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Messages:
    511
    Location:
    San Diego
    I saw a movie a while back, I think it was called "Mindhunters". Well whatever it was called, it was starring "LL Cool J" so I should have known what was coming. Anyway, there's one scene where they have a gun fight under water but the bullets only travel about six feet or so and then sink slowly. That doesn't seem very realistic to me. Maybe I'm wrong. Does anyone know how far a bullet would travel under water? I know it's not as far as it does through the air because of drag but bullets seem to be pretty hydrodynamic (is that a word?) and I'm sure they'd go farther than six feet.
     
  6. buford1

    buford1 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    69

    Yes a gun will fire underwater. It will not cycle a auto-loading firearm. Gun powder requires no oxygen, as it creates it'a own. I would imagine it could be lethal up to several feet. No damage will happen to the gun because the water pressure inside the barrel is off set by the water pressure on the outside of the barrel. The gun must be fully submerged, to just stick the end of a barrel in water and shoot it is crazy.:eek: :eek:
     
  7. jdberger

    jdberger Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2005
    Messages:
    309
    Thanks for the clarification.
     
  8. VirgilCaine

    VirgilCaine Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2005
    Messages:
    617
    No, that's pretty accurate. Water is pretty good at slowing bullets down. The mythbusters episode showed that faster bullets tore themselves apart IIRC, but slower ones did not. So James Bond should worry about the Makarov sidearms and not the RPDs and AKs when he jumps into the water to escape the nasty Soviets (just an example).
     
  9. PzGren

    PzGren Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2003
    Messages:
    763
    Location:
    SoFlorida
    The German Kampfschwimmer, SEALS, use a H&K P11. It is a revolver - type gun with the chambers sealed. They came up with this after some testing so there might be a reason to it.
     
  10. benEzra

    benEzra Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    8,584
    Location:
    Down East in NC
    Some handguns (usually 9mm's) can be fired underwater w/o breaking--the Glock 17 is a famous example--but when you go to longer barrels and higher-pressure cartridges, you are more likely to get a burst chamber/barrel than a discharge. A barrel full of water resists the acceleration of the bullet, sending chamber pressures through the roof, often enough to swell the barrel, burst the chamber, or otherwise break the gun; the longer the barrel, the greater the resistance. A number of people have blown up their Glock .40's trying to replicate the shooting-underwater trick...the .40 runs a higher chamber pressure, and a .40 barrel holds more water than a 9mm barrel.

    Now, having said that, the Russians did make an automatic weapon specifically designed to fire underwater (for special forces use), but it fired long metal darts at a relatively low velocity, and these would travel for 100 feet or so in water, IIRC. It bore some resemblance to an AK-47, so it may be that this was the gun used in the movie rather than an AK.
     
  11. Nick_90

    Nick_90 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2004
    Messages:
    121
    Location:
    Geneva
    I would never ever try firing underwater with any gun whatsoever. I know Glocks are sometimes provided with an extra part in order to fire underwater but it remains rather dangerous.
    A quick look around the Internet should provide you with enough horror stories to discourage you from trying.
    However, IN CASE OF AN EMERGENCY, it is true that you'd better completely fill the barrel with water before shooting underwater. If only half full, you are sure to have a Ka Boom.
     
  12. Travis McGee

    Travis McGee Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2003
    Messages:
    1,790
    Location:
    NE Florida
    Don't do this with AR type rifles! Even after being dunked, be careful to retract the bolt and allow the gas tube and barrel to drain. The residue in the gas tube can trap water after submersion, and lead to dangerous results and damaged receivers. Iikewise, water in the barrel can cause catastrophic failure.
     
  13. KriegHund

    KriegHund Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Messages:
    1,514
    Location:
    Colorado, Broomfield
    IIRC if you fire a gas-operated weapon that was submerged in water and still has alot of water in it it can create steam that will blow the tubes up??
     
  14. TechBrute

    TechBrute Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2003
    Messages:
    3,264
    Location:
    DFW, TX
    Can you provide your source, please?
     
  15. Carl N. Brown

    Carl N. Brown Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Messages:
    8,109
    Location:
    Kingsport Tennessee
    An old Sea Hunt episode had Lloyd Bridges firing a revolver underwater as
    a test. 1950s Nostalgia.

    About the only thing that works underwater as a credible weapon
    are those Russian spearguns, some of which resemble AKs, but
    even then the range is limited.

    Water resistence is much greater than air resistence on a projectile:
    try throwing a rock underwater.
     
  16. avpro

    avpro Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2005
    Messages:
    44
    On the Myth Busters show, they fired all sorts of calibers at ballistic gel that was 3' under water. None of the bullets reached the gel. They then moved the gel closer (I think 18"). Only one bullet reached the gel. It was a low velocity bullet. All of the .223, 30-06, and even .50BMG could not touch the gel just 18" under water! So if you are being shot at, you will be safe just 18" under water. So all those movies you see like Saving Private Ryan where the bullets where going through the water and then right through some poor guy under water, won't happen. At least according to Myth Busters ;)
     
  17. mbt2001

    mbt2001 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,902
    Location:
    Texas
    I think that is why they used the AK-47. Ballistics aside, the cycling of the gun was real. That is a tough weapon and NOTORIOUSLY realiable...

    I wish we could say the same for the AR-15 / M16 guns...
     
  18. WvaBill

    WvaBill Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2003
    Messages:
    368
    Location:
    Springtime, WV
    I remember reading that, but only found this:

    http://www.safetycenter.navy.mil/media/groundwarrior/issues/summer02/twom4s.htm
     
  19. TechBrute

    TechBrute Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2003
    Messages:
    3,264
    Location:
    DFW, TX
    Thanks!
     
  20. shermacman

    shermacman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    1,754
    It was on a hot day, this past August, when I jumped into the shallow end of our pool. I was wearing my trusty black, tacticle Speedo a Glock 23 in .40 and my S&W .357 wheelie.

    The first six rounds were .38 wad cutters. All fired, all traveled about 6 feet and dropped to the pool bottom. The bullets exhibited no expansion. The second six were full party house hand loaded .357 rounds. Same deal, they traveled a couple of feet farther but no more than eight feet total, no expansion.

    The Glock fired but would not cycle. Same deal, six feet of travel, drop to the bottom, no expansion.

    My head was out of the water, the sound was like a thump, no one in the house heard a thing. I was underwhelmed.

    I had better never catch my kids trying some stoopid stunt like that!
     
  21. ctdonath

    ctdonath Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2003
    Messages:
    3,618
    Location:
    Cumming GA
    Yes, some guns can function reasonably well underwater.

    Any proper discussion comes with extreme warnings of don't try this at home, do it at your own risk. Can be done safely, but mistakes and failure can be extremely serious.

    Hollowpoints will expand in the barrel, causing "kabooms" and hand damage.
    As water does not compress, sonic impulse is transferred efficiently and can easily destroy eardrums and cause other serious harm.

    That said, done right some common firearms can function underwater.

    The Glock 17 can do so when fitted with "marine spring cups", filled entirely with water, and loaded with FMJ ball rounds. Effective range is somewhere around 11 yards, able to punch thru plywood. Some divers use 'em against sharks.

    The XM8 is designed to function with a barrel full of water.

    This thread appears periodically, and is usually full of misinformation. Search the web for pages (there are several) describing how to do it correctly in detail.
     
  22. TechBrute

    TechBrute Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2003
    Messages:
    3,264
    Location:
    DFW, TX
    Thanks for setting us all straight. Can you provide some sources for your information?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page