Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Uniforms in War

Discussion in 'Legal' started by DigitalWarrior, Aug 19, 2003.

?

If I was a freedom fighter, and If being seen meant certain death I would

  1. Certainly always wear a uniform. It is mandated by the Geneva Convention, and the law is the law.

    2 vote(s)
    6.7%
  2. Certainly always wear a uniform. I would not want to place non-combatants at risk. I would not fig

    2 vote(s)
    6.7%
  3. Sometimes wear a uniform. I would wear my uniform while involved in action against the occupying fo

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. I would wear a uniform in action against occupying forces if I could get one. If I couldn't get one

    11 vote(s)
    36.7%
  5. I would never wear a uniform because it will cause the occupiers of the land to treat my people poor

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  6. I would never wear a uniform because I serve the cause of justice better alive than dead (or have a

    13 vote(s)
    43.3%
  7. I would never wear a uniform because any civilian who would not suffer for freedom are not my countr

    2 vote(s)
    6.7%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. DigitalWarrior

    DigitalWarrior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2003
    Messages:
    867
    Location:
    Nashua NH
    I am trying to explore the concept of an official uniform in relation to morality.

    I am picturing the UN crushing the US military in days, and a homegrown resistance to a technologically superior, professional military.

    What would your moral obligation be? Please explain.
     
  2. TheeBadOne

    TheeBadOne Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    2,217
    Location:
    Nemo sine vitio est
    The UN couldn't crush the can without the US. Don't worry about it.
     
  3. Kaylee

    Kaylee Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    3,749
    Location:
    The Last Homely House
    :D

    thank you. I can go to bed smiling now. :) :D:D



    to the broader question though... I ain't in no army, I never intend to BE in anybody's army, and I don't even want to LOOK like I'm in no army.

    People in armies get shot at.

    take from that what you will.

    -K
     
  4. goalie

    goalie Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2003
    Messages:
    1,168
    Location:
    Minnetonka, Minnesota
    I am in no army either. Never was. Once upon a time I was in the Marine Corps though........... :D

    Anyhow, you do what you gotta do. If you are armed and able and won't do what needs doing, well, like the saying goes: "All that it takes for evil to win is for good men to do nothing."
     
  5. Hkmp5sd

    Hkmp5sd Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    6,513
    Location:
    Winter Haven, FL
    If fighting against an occupying force in your home country using guerrilla warfare, wear whatever you deem necessary to get the job done. However, do not expect to be treated as a soldier if captured, but a criminal, spy or terrorist.
     
  6. Kharn

    Kharn Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    3,999
    Location:
    Maryland
    Not in uniform: Shot on sight (or shot in the back of the head once discovered)
    In uniform: Shot on sight if you dont surrender first.

    Not very good odds either way, I'm not sure which one I would do, it would sure depend on the circumstances (like if I was with a group of professionals or alone).

    Kharn
     
  7. Leatherneck

    Leatherneck Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    2,545
    Location:
    No. Virginia and Northern Neck
    Them and what army? :rolleyes:

    TC
    TFL Survivor
     
  8. seeker_two

    seeker_two Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    3,616
    Location:
    Deep in the Heart of the Lone Star State (TX)
    2 reasons...

    1. The US is the only one who even TRIES to abide by the Geneva Conventions. Your chances are the same either way.

    2. I wouldn't be planning to surrender anyway... :evil:
     
  9. Steve Smith

    Steve Smith Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Messages:
    4,394
    Location:
    Southeastern US
    You don't have an option for me. Something that reads like: "I would not wear a uniform because I could be more effective against my enemy."
     
  10. scotjute

    scotjute Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2003
    Messages:
    567
    Location:
    Texas
    If I were in the situation you described, I would wear whatever was effective, helped me to blend in and not stand out like a sore thumb and was available. The trouble with blue jeans is that color stands out like a sore thumb, so yes in a natural setting I would prefer camo, kakhi, or olive-drab type clothes, that blend in with the environment, if that is the uniform available, then I'm in it. If the uniform was British red, well no way.
    Doubt the few days scenario, however if we were hit with limited nuclear strike, our armed services would be stressed to respond to a massive point invasion. Local Citizen resistance/harrassment would be important til what survives of our military could respond.
     
  11. C.R.Sam

    C.R.Sam Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    2,632
    Location:
    Chino Valley, AZ., USA
    Situationally dependant.

    Sam
     
  12. geekWithA.45

    geekWithA.45 Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    9,056
    Location:
    SouthEast PA
    {UN crushes US} ROFLMAO!

    OK, I'll bite:

    For me, it's simple. I have militarily adequate armaments. I don't have a uniform. Nuff said.
     
  13. Gordon Fink

    Gordon Fink Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2003
    Messages:
    2,322
    Location:
    California
    The United States cannot currently be invaded militarily. We can destroy any invasion force before it reaches our shores.

    ~G. Fink
     
  14. seeker_two

    seeker_two Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    3,616
    Location:
    Deep in the Heart of the Lone Star State (TX)
    Assuming, of course, that it's not invited in... :scrutiny:

    _155483_un_building150.jpg

    One part of NYC is occupied already... :barf:
     
  15. Correia

    Correia Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    10,648
    Location:
    SLC
    If I'm a guerilla fighter, the only uniform I'm likely to wear is the one that belongs to the invading army.
     
  16. Gordon Fink

    Gordon Fink Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2003
    Messages:
    2,322
    Location:
    California
    Seeker, are U.N. troops really occupying New York? :D

    ~G. Fink
     
  17. seeker_two

    seeker_two Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    3,616
    Location:
    Deep in the Heart of the Lone Star State (TX)
    Well, Kofi & his goons ARE packing MP-5's... :what:
     
  18. Hkmp5sd

    Hkmp5sd Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    6,513
    Location:
    Winter Haven, FL
    Not for long. They were told and agreed to remove them from the US.:)
     
  19. Gordon Fink

    Gordon Fink Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2003
    Messages:
    2,322
    Location:
    California
    A U.N. security team hardly constitutes an “invasion force.†A small, covert-ops force could easily slip into our country, as we well know, but an invading army entering the country is something else. I maintain that it can’t currently be done.

    ~G. Fink
     
  20. DigitalWarrior

    DigitalWarrior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2003
    Messages:
    867
    Location:
    Nashua NH
    Of course the UN will not crush the united states... I should have said that I was LMAO or something. I do not need a tinfoil hat.

    The reason I asked this question is that there was a discussion that I was having, that seemed to indicate that people who would not wear a uniform to do battle with a sophisticated enemy are less than human. I was curious as to how many who walk the high road are (according to some) less than human.

    I got the results I pretty much expected. 80-90% (sub-human).
     
  21. Malone LaVeigh

    Malone LaVeigh Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,136
    Location:
    Washed out of Four-dollar Bayou. Now I'm... somewh
    You don't have an entry for "black pajamas." Worked for the last guys.
     
  22. Devonai

    Devonai Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2003
    Messages:
    3,850
    Location:
    Connecticut
    I voted for,

    The uniform hanging in my closet will suffice. It would assure that the guys in my unit wouldn't target me, as well as prevent other National Guardsmen from indiscriminantly mowing me down.

    We are talking about the UN here, right? Hopefully y'all won't shoot at someone dressed in Woodland Camo with a like-colored K-pot. Aim for the blue!
     
  23. sleepyhead

    sleepyhead Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2003
    Messages:
    10
    Location:
    PA
    Civilians who spontaneously take up arms to resist an invading force do not need to wear uniforms to avoid "illegal combatant" treatment under the Geneva Convention. That said, once we got organized, while bearing arms I would prefer that any units bear some insignia -- does NOT have to be a bright red target under Geneva Convention, just an insignia -- to show units are organized and under some command structure. The Geneva Convention exists for a reason. It really is a GOOD THING.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page