Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

UPDATE - Paper printed letter!

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by TexasVet, Sep 10, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. TexasVet

    TexasVet Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    402
    Location:
    deep east Texas
    Our weekly paper came out today and the Editor printed my letter in it's entirety! This is the version they printed....
    -------------------------------------------------------
    September 5, 2003

    To the Editor:
    As a former weapons history researcher (and continuing student of firearms history), I was disappointed to see such an elementary error in the headline of the September 4th issue of the Standard. Seeing it repeated in the text of the story raised my ire.
    First, a Tec-9 (note: not a Tech-9) pistol is NOT an "automatic weapon", it is a SEMI-automatic pistol, just like the pistols carried by most police and citizens with Texas Concealed Handgun Licenses.
    "Fully automatic machine pistols" are extremely expensive and rare due to the stringent requirements of the 1934 National Firearms Act and are never found in possesion of street punks.
    The chances of this pistol being "fully automatic" are very slim. The owner MAY have illegally converted it to full automatic, a difficult thing to do properly and usually unsafe at both ends, but then I would have expected our police to have charged him with the Federal felony that this act commands. Since no mention of this violation was included in your story, I must assume that your writer has succumbed to the ill-informed journalists first axiom, "Any gun mentioned in a newspaper story must be either a 'fully automatic machine pistol' or an 'evil assault weapon' "
    when, in fact, these types of weapons are virtually never used in crimes in this country.
    The Tec-9 may look scary to the non-gun person, but it is in fact an awkward, inaccurate piece of junk, beloved by gang-bangers for it's looks alone.
    Those of us in Texas who love and use firearms with care and respect dislike the inflated and scaremongering tactics of using the "automatic" boogeyman to spice up news stories when it is almost always a factual error and usually an indication of anti-gun bias on the part of the writer.
    I hope that this exaggeration will not appear in my local paper again. It's bad enough seeing it in the liberal east and west coast media every time you turn around, and with as little justification.
    I depend on the Standard to bring me the ACCURATE local news.

    Sincerely,
    ---------------------------------------------------

    They even took the time to answer it.....

    ----------------------------------------------------

    (EDITOR'S NOTE: A check with Police Chief Gentry confirmed that the Tec-9 is a semi-automatic weapon. The error in last week's story was the result of a misunderstanding in the description given of the weapon by police to the newspaper. The Standard regrets any inconvenience this error may have caused.)


    :D :D

    edited 'cause I don't type good when I'm giggling, either!:rolleyes:
     
  2. gulogulo1970

    gulogulo1970 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2003
    Messages:
    855
    Location:
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Good job! If we all stay on the media this might keep them honest. There are alot of gun owners, if we use our voice things can change.
     
  3. OF

    OF Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,988
    - Gabe
     
  4. 4v50 Gary

    4v50 Gary Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    18,682
    Bravo, especially since yours was a long letter. :cool:
     
  5. Braz

    Braz Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Messages:
    434
    Location:
    Mukilteo, Wa.
    :D :D :D

    Tex, ya made ma day. Thanks for taking the time to set them stright. All Texans benefit by it, even those of us living on the left coast. ;)
     
  6. OEF_VET

    OEF_VET Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2003
    Messages:
    2,062
    Location:
    Murfreesboro, TN
    TexasVet,

    You da man!

    Frank
     
  7. Tierhog

    Tierhog Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2003
    Messages:
    233
    Location:
    Forks, Wa
    Score one for the good guys!!

    Well said.
     
  8. RTFM

    RTFM member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2003
    Messages:
    1,140
    Location:
    Land of ID
    Right on!
    RTFM
     
  9. Nekron

    Nekron Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    104
    Location:
    Kansas
    OUTSTANDING!!

    Great work and, thanks TexasVet!
     
  10. DigMe

    DigMe Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2003
    Messages:
    2,481
    Location:
    Waco, TX
    Note that they never say "We messed up. It's our fault and we're sorry." They subtly implicate the police dept. in the error noting that the description was "given by the police." Even if they do say it was a misunderstanding it still sounds weasely to me.

    brad cook
     
  11. C.R.Sam

    C.R.Sam Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    2,632
    Location:
    Chino Valley, AZ., USA
    Outstanding.

    Yeah, was a bit of a weasely response but a lot more than we used to.

    Long letter, yes. But very well written. Made the difference.

    Sam
     
  12. Chipperman

    Chipperman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    4,572
    Location:
    Essex Co, MA
    Nice Work!

    Even if the Paper admits no culpability, the Sheeple got a chance to see it.

    That's much more important. I'd rather have it this way than a non-published letter to you admitting their guilt.
     
  13. CZ 75 BD

    CZ 75 BD Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    755
    Location:
    The Heart of Dixie
    Good on you!

    Held their feet to the fire and made them back up, just like Wayne LaPierre did.:cool:
     
  14. Moparmike

    Moparmike Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2003
    Messages:
    3,600
    Location:
    Oddly enough, a downwardly-plunging firey handbask
    In the immortal words of Cartman: "Kick azz!"

    Ditto the "weasely" sounding response on the part of the paper.
     
  15. TexasVet

    TexasVet Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    402
    Location:
    deep east Texas
    Thank, guys...

    for the compliments. I noticed the "weasel" answer too. In fact, as I drove thru town today a cop car happened to be behind me for a while and I actually worried that Chief Gentry might be mad at ME for him getting the blame from the paper. Paranoia, I hope.:uhoh:
     
  16. S_O_Laban

    S_O_Laban Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    858
    Location:
    near Independence MO
    Maybe you could talk to the local police officer who gave the paper the descrption of the gun and get the other side of the story? What they might say could be very interesting! BTW congrats on getting this published.
     
  17. PAshooter

    PAshooter Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Messages:
    614
    Location:
    Pennsylvania, U.S.A.!!!
    Excellent letter, Tex. Well-worded, polite, and straight to the point. I'm keeping this one on file, and (with your permission) may send a heavily plagiarized version to my local rag - The Baltimore Sun - the next time they print an inflamatory, factually inaccurate gun-related story... I shouldn't have to wait long. Of course I'll have to do some re-wording, as I do expect this kind of anti-gun exaggeration from the flagship of the East Coast Liberal Press.

    Probably won't get printed anyway...
     
  18. NewShooter78

    NewShooter78 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    678
    Location:
    Honolulu, HI
    Good job! Too bad they don't print editorials closer to the front of the paper. :evil:
     
  19. Guntalk

    Guntalk Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2003
    Messages:
    835
    Location:
    Louisiana
    Excellent!

    Don't worry about printing editorials and letters in the back of the front section. Letters are one of the most-read parts of the paper, and it's about the only area that we can (often) gain direct access to.

    Great letter.
     
    Last edited: Sep 11, 2003
  20. DMK

    DMK Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,797
    Location:
    Over the hills and far, far away
    I love this part! That's a very good scolding and they deserve it.
     
  21. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    Well done!
     
  22. Chugach

    Chugach Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    232
    Location:
    Anchorage, Alaska
    Good work, TexasVet! Very well written...
     
  23. TexasVet

    TexasVet Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    402
    Location:
    deep east Texas
    Guys, I got phone calls from people who don't know me and had to look up my number in the book thanking me for the letter today!!
    Our paper is a little weekly, runs around 16-18 pages, and everybody reads everything in it every week.

    Mr. Gresham, that "great letter" meant a lot coming from you.:D

    BTW, when I mentioned in the letter that I am a former weapons researcher, I meant it. If you have 'Small Arms of the World, 12th edition" by Dr. Ed Ezell, that is my name under his on the title page. Ed was a very good friend of mine and I miss him.
     
  24. Orthonym

    Orthonym Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2003
    Messages:
    1,354
    Location:
    Southern Florida
    Thanks

    I especially like the last sentence. Kind of a "carrot" simultaneous with a "Shame on you!"
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page