Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Using Satallite Tracking to Tax Drivers in Oregon....

Discussion in 'Legal' started by Justin Moore, Jan 2, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Justin Moore

    Justin Moore Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    178
    Location:
    Gun Range
    This stuff is so weird that you CAN'T make it up:

    Big Brother eyes taxes by the mile
    State considers space-based technology to collect revenue

    CNS News 12/31/02

    Original Link: http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=30246

    The latest proposal by government to collect tax revenue may seem out of this world – that's because it is.

    The state of Oregon is considering the use of satellite technology to charge taxes based on how much mileage you drive your car.

    The Road User Fee Task Force set up by lawmakers last year plans to ask the 2003 session to authorize testing of a vehicle-mileage tax, reports the Associated Press.

    Oregon was the first state back in 1919 to adopt a gas tax, and today officials expect revenues to flatten as gas mileage improves and more hybrid cars come on line.

    Jim Whitty, the task force administrator, says his group is looking at a per-mile charge of up to 1.25 cents to generate funds comparable to the current gas tax.

    "We also have to have a way to track mileage only within the state," Whitty told the AP. This rules out basing the fee on odometer readings, which would include out-of-state driving.

    "Technology has improved to the degree that this can be done, with an electronic device," he said.

    The device in each car would be linked to a Global Positioning Satellite system, or GPS, which allows pinpoint navigation by bouncing signals off satellites.

    The task force hopes to organize a test of this system if lawmakers approve, checking to see if the system even works, then conducting a yearlong evaluation.

    There are several options for actually collecting fees. One is to send vehicle owners a monthly bill, another is to outfit gas stations so they can read vehicle transponders and collect the tax at fueling stops.

    If you think the new method would do away with the tax on fuel, think again. In assessing the new levy, drivers would get credit for gas tax already paid.

    To protect drivers' privacy, using the system to track cars in real time would be illegal. New cars would be required to have the GPS technology. Owners of older cars would be allowed to take part by retrofitting them.

    A final decision on the proposal is not expected to come until the 2005 legislative session at the earliest.


    :fire:

    A 'promise' to not track people in real time is worthless IMHO. Remember that promise that the SSN wouldn't be used for identification purposes?
     
  2. mussi

    mussi Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    213
    Location:
    Somehwhere in Western Europe
    Proof the econazis are no better than a bunch of robbers.

    We reduce fuel consumption, thereby helping environment, and voila, there's a new tax just for driving around with your vehicle. If they want to tax you for road usage, they'll find a smarter way like taxing on the vehicle weight (which is a IMO a good way since heavier vehicles damage roads more).

    And I'm sure they will not abolish the fuel tax.
     
  3. El Tejon

    El Tejon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    18,085
    Location:
    Lafayette, Indiana-the Ned Flanders neighbor to Il
    mussi, the federal fuel tax here is for buying votes! They'll never get rid of that.:D

    Help me out here guys as I know very little of technology. Are they using GPS like technology or lowjack or what?

    Wouldn't people just disable their vehicles transmitters so they could not be tracked and taxed?:confused:
     
  4. Don45cal

    Don45cal Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    58
    Location:
    Philadelphia, PA
    BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
     
  5. tyme

    tyme Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    2,550
    Location:
    Novalis
    L1 freq: 1575.42 MHz (civilian)
    L2 freq: 1227.60 MHz (military)

    Build a jammer and not only will you evade the tax (claim the receiver's broken), you'll piss off everyone nearby who can't understand why their fancy vehicle navigation systems aren't working. :evil: Of course, you'll probably also get arrested by the FCC within a week :(
     
  6. 2nd Amendment

    2nd Amendment member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,929
    Location:
    Indiana
    So, who would pay to add the equipment and all the necessary supporting widgets to my '64 Caddy? My old Jag? The '63 GMC? Will they pay for the damage this does to the vehicle value because of the modifications? Or does this become an eventual excuse to further that study the EPA(or DoD, I forget which) did several years ago that called for the elimination of vehicles over 5 years old?

    As a wise man once said, SCROOM!
     
  7. cuchulainn

    cuchulainn Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    3,297
    Location:
    Looking for a cow that Queen Meadhbh stole
    I'd like to see a cost analysis of such a program. Just how much revenue would they net after subtracting all the costs of the program. This sounds like a tax collection scheme that will increase the need to raise taxes to pay for the cost of tax collection scheme (now I'm dizzy).

    Oh wait, maybe in lieu of raising taxes, the state will add a "GPS user fee" by which citizens will pay the state for its "services in tracking their mileage."

    "No Mr. Driver, this is not a tax; this is a user fee. You are using our GPS equipment to arrive at your appropriate tax bill. It is selfish of you to balk at paying your fair share for this convenience. Indeed, if you drive less, your taxes will be very low. This service may help you pay less tax."

    "Um, but the user fee alone is more than my old tax, and when you add my new tax, I'm paying more overall even if I never drive."

    "Yes, but your tax is lower. Isn't that worth paying for?"
     
  8. foghornl

    foghornl Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    7,403
    Hmmmmm

    Time to finish up on that project motorcycle...You know, the old Harley, Kawasaki, Triumph, Indian, etc tucked away in the back of the garage.......:neener:
     
  9. PATH

    PATH Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,844
    Location:
    Rockland, New York
    I said it before in many a post and I'll say it again, it is geting very Orwellian isn't it?:fire: :cuss:
     
  10. deanf

    deanf Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    486
    Location:
    N46º 54’ x W122º 34’
    Tinfoil over the antenna.
     
  11. Oleg Volk

    Oleg Volk Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    9,155
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    I expect high incidence of breakage among the devices. If they become part of the ignition, then I expect many car sales from border dealerships inthe next state. Americans are inventive about such things.
     
  12. Gray Peterson

    Gray Peterson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,548
    Location:
    Lynnwood, Washington
    This will never pass. A large majority of car drivers are in the Portland area, and they'll buy cars just across the river. There will be massive civil disobedience over this. If they try to charge by mile, they would have to charge non-residents, and that would violate several ICC rules as well.
     
  13. sm

    sm member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    28,389
    Location:
    Between black coffee, and shiftn' gears
    "Orwellian" Yep

    Everyone scoffs at the elderly with the older vehicles,whom shakes heads at 'new fangled stuff", drop jaws and glare at the news. That old Buck didn't get old by becoming prey. History lessons --focus on LESSONS
     
  14. justinh

    justinh Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    24
    Location:
    Montana
    :rolleyes:
     
  15. Mike Irwin

    Mike Irwin Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    7,956
    Location:
    Below the Manson-Nixon line in Virginia...
    12,000 miles a year, at 1.25 cents per mile is $150 per year.

    OK,new taxes of $150 a year stink, no matter how you raise them.

    But there's already a mechanism in place to collect these taxes...

    It's called the frigging gas tax.

    Just raise it.

    That's a use fee pure and simple, and you're also collecting it on out of staters, which is always considered to be a good thing.

    I guarantee you if they pass something THIS assnine there will be a LOT of cars that never leave the garage.

    Well, the satellite transponder won't leave the garage...
     
  16. Navy joe

    Navy joe Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,362
    Location:
    VA
    Thank you Mike, it's hilarious they come up with some James Bond stuff when a novel concept exists. The more gas you buy, the more you must be using the roads! Imagine that. It's a use fee, I hate taxes, like that. I agree that fossil fuel use must be reduced, sometimes even the leftist eco-weenies are right.

    Today the price of gas is way lower than it's historical value. 15-30 cents per gallon was common throughout the 30s-50s, in today's money gas should be 3-4 bucks a gallon. I figure that's a lil excessive given increased supply efficiency, but still it's funny to hear people drinking $4 a gallon water, buying $4 milk, whining about the price of gas.

    Last I was in France gas was 5 francs per litre. Hmm, 5 frogs to the dollar at that time, 4 liters in a gallon nearabouts and wow! We won't have cheap gas forever, it's time to stop treating that idea as a political sacred cow and try to be less dependent. Some of the gas tax should support alternative energy investment, usable technologies such as hybrid, fuel cell, and others exist. Of course the eco-weenies don't like me because while we're busy building fuel efficient vehicles, solar and wind power we should also be drilling(safely) on the ANWR and building more nuclear power operations.

    Another novel low-tech concept exists too. It's called a freakin' toll booth people, no satellite required, makes a job for somebody that might otherwise be on welfare too.
     
  17. matis

    matis Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    384
    Location:
    I used to live in the USA; now I find myself in th
    They're NOT stupid, really.

    Seeing how abysmal government services are, I used to think government was stupid. Then I stopped to think how much of our money now goes to them, how much of our lives are now controlled by them. They're not stupid; I simply misunderstood their true purpose. If anyone is stupid, it's US for allowing them to gain so much power over us. We're the ones who are stupid!

    I guarantee you that if (when) they implement something like this, it will be designed so that if you disable the transponder, you've also disabled the ignition or vehicle computer. AND the vehicle will probably transmit a signal that the device is non-operational, and any cop you pass will know if you're taxing yourself or not.

    Sure a few hackers will find a way to defeat this. But 98% of us suckers will just pay.

    They're much smarter than we are. Come on, admit it.

    Matis
     
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2003
  18. Zip06

    Zip06 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    393
    Location:
    Pacific Northwest
    Its true that we have Special Ed. legislators here in Oregon. This is just another of the brain trust's thoughts, like the idea to put a roof on the freeway through Portland or to move the freeway over 100 yards to the left so they can have a new park on the Willamette River. Think what this will do to UPS, Taxi's, any delivery service. In case you did not get the drift of why this is a good idea here it is...New cars are getting so efficient that the State of Oregon is losing money on gasoline taxes and this is the way to bring the revenue back up. Also, the State of Oregon's Department of Transportation with its 1.7 billion dollar budget has not spent a dime on new road construction in years and now says it needs more money.
     
  19. sm

    sm member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    28,389
    Location:
    Between black coffee, and shiftn' gears
    Mike Irwin

    I agree, I was alluding to the fact a lot of the older persons -just don't participate in some sci-fi , Orwelian ideals...until no choice...but protest best can. Here in my state (homestate of Klinton) we have such bad mgt of roads and taxes. Thought for years tolls be a good idea. Political machine here more worried about pockets than using tases effectivley. Oh during an election year throw a bone for votes. No wonder we rank at or near the bottom of most lists.
     
  20. Preacherman

    Preacherman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    13,309
    Location:
    Louisiana, USA
    While on the subject of tracking systems and cars... how many drivers are aware that since the late 1990's, most cars and trucks manufactured in North America have been fitted with a "black box"? It's part of the vehicle's standard computer systems, and can be "tapped" to see how fast the vehicle was going / had been going before and during a collision. It's theoretically possible to build an interface so that a cop could stop you for speeding and read out, from your own car's computer, the speed you were doing! I hate Big Brother's baneful influence... :fire:
     
  21. alan

    alan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,598
    Location:
    sowest pa.
    Is there something strange in the water out west?
     
  22. TallPine

    TallPine Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    7,734
    Location:
    somewhere in the middle of Montana
    Just along the coast.
     
  23. sm

    sm member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    28,389
    Location:
    Between black coffee, and shiftn' gears
    Preacher

    I bet Big Brother hates "points plugs and condensers" :D
     
  24. Gordon

    Gordon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    8,292
    Location:
    central Kali.
    I WAS gonna retire to my property in so. coastal Oregon, but if they keep up the crap they been pulling for last couple years it's looking like it'll be another Kali. or worse! I guess this is what happens when red diaper doper babies grow up and go to state legislature.:fire:
     
  25. Sodbuster

    Sodbuster Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    509
    Location:
    Gallatin Co. MT
    1983 models and before, correct?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page