Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Velocity vs. barrel length

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Win75, Aug 24, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Win75

    Win75 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2003
    Messages:
    199
    Location:
    SouthEast Missouri
    I have seen this somewhere and should know but I can't find the info right now. What gain in velocity do you get in a .223, .243, 25-06, etc. per each inch of barrel length past, say 22 inches?
     
  2. sarduy

    sarduy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2007
    Messages:
    2,524
    Location:
    United States of America
    1 inch = ~100fps
     
  3. Strongbad

    Strongbad Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2005
    Messages:
    692
    Location:
    Austin, Tx
    On big mags with slow burning powders, I'd say that sarduy's numbers are probably right. On the rounds you mentioned, probably less. Half that much maybe, just due to the quicker burn rate of the powders used. That's just my own personal rule of thumb mind you. A lot of things come into play. Dan Lilja did a test on this and has the results posted on the web. That being said, it's very very subjective. It's going to vary from chambering to chambering and gun to gun. Tightness of the bore, that kind of thing.
     
  4. Ridgerunner665

    Ridgerunner665 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    3,400
    Location:
    Upper East Tennessee
    243 and 25-06 can be as high as 70 - 90 fps per inch, up to 24 inches.

    The 223 is less because its powder charge is smaller...it will be about 30 - 60 fps per inch, up to 24 inches.

    You will get varying replies on this...but I have experimented with this a lot and thats what I have found to be the average.

    308's are good to go with 20 inch barrels with the right powders...its all about efficiency, not larger capacity...the more efficient a round burns...the less powder and barrel it needs.
     
  5. Ridgerunner665

    Ridgerunner665 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    3,400
    Location:
    Upper East Tennessee
    The 243 suffers REAL BAD with barrels less than 22 inches...100 fps per inch easily. Over 22 inches though and it gets back into its comfort zone, the difference is not near so much.
     
  6. Loomis

    Loomis member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Messages:
    938
    The only caliber I can comment on with some degree of accuracy without doing research is the 22LR. 22 long rifle ammo reaches it's max velocity in about one foot of barrel length or less.

    Naturally, the bigger calibers will require more barrel to reach their max velocity. But my hunch is that most calibers will gain very little velocity from barrels longer than 22"
     
  7. shadowalker

    shadowalker Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    640
    Location:
    Idaho
    .308 / 30-06 is 20-25 fps per inch, my LR-308 with 16 inch barrel has is 20 fps per inch.

    Here is an article with information on various calibers and velocity decrease per two inches of lost barrel, after 22 inches most calibers are only gaining ~ 25 fps per inch.
     
  8. Auburn1992

    Auburn1992 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    Messages:
    1,015
    Location:
    Tennessee
    Anyone know what the 7mm-08 is?
     
  9. Ridgerunner665

    Ridgerunner665 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    3,400
    Location:
    Upper East Tennessee
    Pretty much the same as 308...but I believe the 7mm-08 is at its best with a 22 inch barrel.
     
  10. jmr40

    jmr40 Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Messages:
    10,393
    Location:
    Georgia
    According to a Remington ballistics chart I have:

    2000-2500fps +/- 10fps/inch
    2500-3000fps +/- 20fps/inch
    3000-3500fps +/- 30fps/inch
    3500-4000fps +/- 40fps/inch

    This assumes that you start with a 24 inch barrel.
     
  11. cliffy

    cliffy member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2008
    Messages:
    643
    Location:
    Southwestern Michigan
    FPS Drop/Gain per inch of barrel length

    A .223 Remington shines brightly at 22" of barrel length, yet rifling twist governs what weight bullets will do the best shining.

    A .243 Winchester shines brightest at 24" barrel length, yet rifling twist governs what weight bullets will provide the maximum shine.

    Caliber plus velocity plus a lot of other factors govern accuracy and striking force at any given range.

    Powder and powder charges contribute to these other "factors" concerning velocity. A bullet that fails to leave to leave the muzzle at 3000 fps fails my tests automatically. Hence I don't like super-heavy bullets. Speed Kills: Medicrocy Wounds, with less than a well-placed bullet. Hydrostatic Shock is no Myth! Otherwise, we should all be using wheely-bows with arrows! cliffy
     
  12. R.W.Dale

    R.W.Dale Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2005
    Messages:
    11,398
    Location:
    Northwest Arkansas
    The quick rule of thumb is the more overbore the chambering the more you lose per inch of bbl.

    243 and 25/06 will get hit really hard in a short barrel as much as 70 or 80 fps

    308 and 30/06 not so much maybe 30 to 40

    358 and 35 whelen hardly at all
     
  13. rangerruck

    rangerruck Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Messages:
    8,374
    Location:
    Texas, baby!
    I pretty much figure, any centerfire doing 3000fps, is going to gain no more than 50 fps, and leave it at that.
     
  14. Art Eatman

    Art Eatman Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    43,762
    Location:
    Terlingua, TX; Thomasville,GA
    Every now and then--every ten years or so--somebody gets ambitious and actually does some testing.

    For starters, almost all ammo used to have published factory data as to velocity, and most data was taken from rifles with 26" barrels. There used to be foam-backed pads at gunstores with all this info on the top. You could lay pistols or scopes on them during "tire kicking" and not scratch the glass or the item. Winchester and Remington used to give them out by the thousands.

    So time goes on and 26" barrels become uncommon. Today's data is commonly from 20" to 24" rifles.

    Anyhow, when folks cut back an inch at a time, there is a certain amount of consistency in velocity reduction.

    My memory has it from reading a couple or three articles over the years:

    Maggies, around 100 ft/sec/inch.
    '06-case type, around 75 ft/sec/inch.
    .308-case type, around 40 ft/sec/inch.

    As usual, "roughly". "Generally." "Rule of thumb."
     
  15. NCsmitty

    NCsmitty Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2008
    Messages:
    5,325
    Location:
    North Carolina
    The sharper the bottle neck, the more you will lose. That's why straight case cartridges generally work better for shorter barrels.

    NCsmitty
     
  16. LAR-15

    LAR-15 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    3,385
    Most of your 'ultralight' and 'compact' rifles on the market have barrel of 18-22 inches.

    Very few go down to 17 inches or less

    This has to do with getting good performance from most centrefire rifle rounds

    Shorter barrels just don't allow for sufficient powder to burn to get maximum performance and velocity

    For 'magnum' rounds longer is better
     
  17. R.W.Dale

    R.W.Dale Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2005
    Messages:
    11,398
    Location:
    Northwest Arkansas
    When O when can we finally put this myth to rest.

    With modern centerfire rifle rounds all of the powder that is going to burn will have done so in the first 3 or 4 inches of barrel. The whole faster powders for shorter barrels line is a complete myth. With rifle cartridges 9 times out of 10 the fastest powder for a long bbl will still be the fastest in a carbine. Just look at handgun data vs rifle data for 308 win. With most bullet weights Varget is usually the top performer regardless of bbl length. Be it a 14" ENCORE handgun or a 26" Savage 12fp
     
  18. NCsmitty

    NCsmitty Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2008
    Messages:
    5,325
    Location:
    North Carolina
    krochus, you and I both know that your statement is a half truth because it does not hold true for all cartridges. The more bottle neck rounds need the slower powders with a longer barrel to perform at their highest efficiency. You put a 243 in a 14" encore and compare it to a 24" 243, and powder requirements will be different for optimum velocity. The slower powders offer a longer burn time to achieve this in a longer barrel. You know that, that's why they are called slower burning. You cannot blanket all rounds with your statement, if that was the case, everyone would be fine with a 16" barrel. Your comparison of the 308 is more the exception than the rule and that is a little flawed. It's just that Varget is a very versatile powder in that round.
    I have a TC Contender in 223 w/14" barrel and my powder requirements run much faster powders, RE-7 & 4198, than the usual slower H-335 that's used in many 223 rifles.
    So the statement that I'm making is that sometimes a faster powder will give better velocities than slower powders, when used in shorter barrels.


    NCsmitty
     
  19. TRGRHPY

    TRGRHPY Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2008
    Messages:
    509
    Can anyone translate what the fps means in bullet-drop for a given round and distance? For example, 20fps may not sound like much of a difference, but IIRC at long distances it can mean enough to determine a hit or miss (which is the point of hand-loading...consistency). True? False?
     
  20. cliffy

    cliffy member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2008
    Messages:
    643
    Location:
    Southwestern Michigan
    Powder Burn Rate directly affects Velocity

    Joyce Hornady says, ". . . all the powder must burn within 95% of barrel length . . ." I use this as my guide related to burn rates. H4350 burns faster than RL-22. This knowledge assists me in component selection for maximum velocities concerning various bullet weights. Of course, I'm talking .243 Winchester here. Alliant RL-25 burns too slowly for maximum velocity in ANY .243 Winchester application. Powder burning out the end of the muzzle aides nothing velocitywise, but can create an extremely unstable, inaccurate bullet. .243 Winchester loads work well with many powders, but all within the proper burn rate range! My .223 Remington loads MUST use faster burning powders than any suited to .243 Winchester applications. I tried Hodgdon H4350 in .223 application and it's really slower in velocity then, say, Alliant RL-10x, yet a .243 Winnie light bullet screams forth at maximum velocity with the very same H4350! IMR 4350 actually burns slightly faster than Hodgdon H4350, and I prefer H4350 in my hot .243 loads. To each his or her own experiences, signed Cliffy.
     
  21. Bartkowski

    Bartkowski Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2007
    Messages:
    1,616
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
  22. XD-40 Shooter

    XD-40 Shooter Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2007
    Messages:
    914
    Here's another good article on the subject, no velocity loss with .308 down to a 20 inch barrel. They also mention that they can go down to 22 inches on 300 win mag with no velocity loss.

    http://www.tacticaloperations.com/SWATbarrel/
     
  23. Loomis

    Loomis member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Messages:
    938
    Ha!

    So I was right then. I just can't help it. I'm very rarely wrong with my hunches.

    See my post #6
     
  24. LAR-15

    LAR-15 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    3,385
    Yeah but if you go down to the US NFA minimum (16 inches) you get a loss.

    Otherwise why bother making guns with barrels over 16.5 inches?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page