Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Virginia panel won't recommend closing 'gun-show loophole'

Discussion in 'Legal' started by Ron-Bon, Jan 13, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Ron-Bon

    Ron-Bon Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2008
    Messages:
    125
    Location:
    Norfolk, VA
    By Dave Forster
    The Virginian-Pilot
    © January 13, 2009
    RICHMOND

    A proposal to recommend closing the so-called gun show loophole failed to pass a vote today by the Virginia State Crime Commission.

    The vote by the commission, an advisory body for the General Assembly, ended in a tie.

    The commission quickly turned to discuss a proposal to staff each gun show with a state trooper - who would watch for unlicensed dealers and provide voluntary checks - and to fund the service with a fee on the gun show's promoter.

    That recommendation passed 7-5.

    Virginia is one of 35 states that do not require criminal and mental-health background checks for gun purchases at shows, though dealers can do it voluntarily. Federally licensed dealers must conduct checks for sales at their stores.

    The commission drew a nearly full crowd, about a hundred people, with many on both sides of the debate.

    About 20 students from Longwood University in Farmville watched the meeting from the third and fourth rows, dressed in black with streamers around their necks in the colors of Virginia Tech. The group, which included family and friends of some of the victims of the April 16, 2007, shooting, planned to demonstrate in support of mandatory background checks by lying down outside after the meeting.

    The Virginia Tech shooter, who killed 32 people before he killed himself, did not buy his firearms from a gun show.
     
  2. mgkdrgn

    mgkdrgn Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2008
    Messages:
    3,914
    Location:
    Lexington, SC
    Ya cain't close what ain't thar to begin with.
     
  3. Funderb

    Funderb Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    2,104
    Location:
    Jacksonville, Bold new city of the south.
    Closing the "loophole" would require huge revisions of state laws that would indeed violate rights other than the 2A.
     
  4. usmarine0352_2005

    usmarine0352_2005 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2005
    Messages:
    2,797

    What state laws?


    .
     
  5. Funderb

    Funderb Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    2,104
    Location:
    Jacksonville, Bold new city of the south.
    the state laws that say you are allowed to sell personal belongings.
    Unless you live in a state where you are not allowed to sell personal items, I assume you have laws that don't forbid it.

    After all, if you can sell a car, why can't you sell a rifle?
     
  6. Titan6

    Titan6 member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,745
    Location:
    Gillikin Country
    See and just the other day I was complaining about how kids today don't get involved. And here they are waving the bloody shirt Civil War Reconstruction Era style in the New South about a completely unrelated issue to their cause.
     
  7. rino451

    rino451 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Messages:
    545
    It'd take changing the law to create a loophole that that change would then close.

    :barf:
     
  8. KBintheSLC

    KBintheSLC Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    3,197
    Location:
    Stalingrad, USA
    Gee... I thought that shooter had a squeaky clean criminal record. So much for the loophole in the so-called "loophole". I guess the next thing to do is ban sales to people based on what you think they might do.
     
  9. chris in va

    chris in va Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Messages:
    6,095
    Location:
    Louisville KY
    I like that last effort to set things straight.
     
  10. ServiceSoon

    ServiceSoon Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,404
    Location:
    Michiana
    Aren't dealers required by law to perform background checks at gun shows?
     
  11. Bill_Rights

    Bill_Rights Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2009
    Messages:
    679
    Location:
    Annandale, Virginia USA
    Virginia shooters doing yearly duty against "loophole" closure

    Every year the namby-pamby groups in Virginia introduce bills in the VA legislature to restrict guns in one way or another. As usual, one of the bills they will enter tries to restrict private citizens from selling their personal property to other private citizens at gun shows. Since the Virginia Tech "massacre", it has been worse, even though the VaTech wacko, Cho, purchased at least one of his two guns, a Glock 19, legally with background check at a public dealer, an FFA gun shop. So, as usual, the anti-gun folks are liars and emotion-manipulators. Or worse, some of them will claim that even the background checks don't work, so get rid of guns altogether. And as usual, us Virginia good-guy gun owners have to mount a campaign to flood our legislature with letters, E-mails and petitions to defeat the anti's bills.

    Since THR is a national/international forum, here's how the Assoc. Press reported the Va Crime Commission hearing:
    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jan/14/panel-deadlocks-over-closing-gun-show-loophole/

    One of the many dangers of closing the gun show "loophole" is that it would really try to make any private sale of private property (if guns) illegal anywhere, even in your living room or hunt club. The "gun show" name is just convenient propaganda/cover for the anti-gun folks.

    Philosophically, what does "private property" mean if the "owner" can't dispose of it as he/she wishes? Pretty much nothing, no meaning. The issue is much bigger than guns....
     
  12. 748

    748 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2006
    Messages:
    421
    Location:
    clovis, NM
    I am sorry but if I were there and saw those students laying down like they were dead VT victims I wouldn't be able to help my self. I would have to ROFL and remind them how stupid they look. Its clear they gave no consideration to family members of those killed.
    I guess no one told them cho didnt get his guns at a gun show.
     
  13. Titan6

    Titan6 member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,745
    Location:
    Gillikin Country
    Students really don't mind being manipulated as long as they can feel like they are a part of something. Examine the Berkley Free Speech movement for a good example.
     
  14. novaDAK

    novaDAK Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,030
    Yes. FFLs are required to do background checks on all buyers, no matter where they do their business, whether it be in their gun shop or a gun show.

    The article both poorly words and intentionally misleads the reader by using the term "unlicensed dealers" (there's no such thing) and saying that licensed dealers can voluntarily do checks at shows (making it seem like they don't have to, which they are required to do by federal law).

    The Virginian-Pilot is known for being anti-gun so this article is no surprise.
     
  15. NavyGuy

    NavyGuy Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2008
    Messages:
    97
    Location:
    Hampton Roads Virginia
    My signature says it all
     
  16. ServiceSoon

    ServiceSoon Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,404
    Location:
    Michiana
    Then it isn't "misleading," it is a blatant lie.
     
  17. .cheese.

    .cheese. Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2007
    Messages:
    3,808
    I am so sick and tired of hearing about the gun show loophole. When will this die? I think this will die around the same time rumors of alien autopsies at Roswell die.
     
  18. Titan6

    Titan6 member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,745
    Location:
    Gillikin Country
    Well this is not entirely true.

    There are "unlicensed dealers" although they are not allowed at gun shows. It is just like saying there are not "unlicensed drivers".

    Also in Virginia a dealer can sell a "personal, private collection" weapon at a gun show without a background check. Not all gun shows allow this but most do and the law does not prohibit someone from doing it. If the dealer wants he can run a background check but does not have to.

    From time to time member of the media will run and buy one just to show how easy it is. The dealer often has these "private collection" pieces available for the same or higher price than a new gun of the same make on the same table.

    There are parking lot deals, and deals before you get to the parking lot.

    The problem is the entire legislation is a lie. It is nothing to do with gun shows, crime or safety and a lot to do with denying people of their rights and property.
     
  19. Caeser2001

    Caeser2001 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2008
    Messages:
    68
    if ftf transfers are illegal then there's nobody to blame but themselves for crime and the revolving door of the criminal justice system.
     
  20. Caeser2001

    Caeser2001 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2008
    Messages:
    68
    and that's not good when it comes time for reelection.
     
  21. ServiceSoon

    ServiceSoon Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,404
    Location:
    Michiana
    In a logical world you are correct. Unfortunately we don't live in this type of world.
     
  22. Bill_Rights

    Bill_Rights Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2009
    Messages:
    679
    Location:
    Annandale, Virginia USA
    Comment to member ".cheese." - get tired, but don't give up!

    on 15 Jan '09 on # 18 of this thread, .cheese. said:

    "I am so sick and tired of hearing about the gun show loophole. When will this die? I think this will die around the same time rumors of alien autopsies at Roswell die."

    Please, PLEASE don't get so tired that you go silent. If it's not the "loophole" it's something else. The anti-gun people must be resisted in YOUR state legislature, the US House/Senate, courts at all levels and even town/city/county governments. Apparently, these anti-gun folks will keep up their attacks long after the rumors of alien autopsies at Roswell die. At least we have to have the attitude that that is how long we'll defend our RKBA. But you know that.

    Wish it were otherwise......
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page