Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

WA- save the self defense reimbursement!

Discussion in 'Activism Discussion and Planning' started by p35, Apr 10, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. p35

    p35 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    998
    Location:
    Puget Sound
    Washington State has a fairly unique law that requires the State to pay a criminal defendant's attorney's fees and lost wages if a jury finds him/her not guilty because he/she acted in self defense.

    I just got word that there's a hearing in the Legislature Wednesday on a proposal to eliminate self defense reimbursement in future fiscal years. Reading between the lines, it looks to me like the Powers That Be (who have always hated the policy) are using the State's current fiscal problems as an opening to get rid of the law.

    The Washington Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is organizing resistance to the proposal, and I am sure they would welcome the weight of the RKBA lobby on their side. If you see a possibility that you might use force to defend yourself or your family in the future, this is about you!

    Please contact your legislators!
     
  2. mljdeckard

    mljdeckard Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2006
    Messages:
    12,705
    Location:
    In a part of Utah that resembles Tattooine.
    How many times have they actually had to reimburse someone? Is this a really big expense?
     
  3. Claude Clay

    Claude Clay Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,700
    Location:
    CT
    in the mid/late 1970"s Connecticut had something similar...

    it was called along the lines of a ' victums account' and paid upto $!0,000 to a victum if and after a criminal was found guilty and the victum could prove his 'loss'. i am not sure if it still exists.
     
  4. p35

    p35 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    998
    Location:
    Puget Sound
    My guess is that they pay out maybe ten claims a year. Not a huge expense.

    We do have a victim compensation program around here that pays medical bills on a system similar to worker's compensation, but that's a different animal entirely.
     
  5. mamartin

    mamartin Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2011
    Messages:
    6
    Location:
    Washington State
    Not surprising here in WAck

    Hey gentlemen, I'm one of those people who would most definately defend myself and family if s hit the fan. I didn't know this act existed but am glad it does. I know something like it exists for the NRA, but would most definately need it, had I been brought up on charges. I will try and find out who I can write a letter to and most definately do so. Thank you, for bringing this to our attention. Regards, Mike
     
  6. bikemutt
    • Contributing Member

    bikemutt Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2010
    Messages:
    4,061
    Location:
    Renton, WA
  7. p35

    p35 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    998
    Location:
    Puget Sound
  8. p35

    p35 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    998
    Location:
    Puget Sound
    Just found out that this year it's about 30 cases and about $1 million total. Could be higher than normal.
     
  9. MD_Willington

    MD_Willington Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2005
    Messages:
    3,692
    Location:
    Canuck in SE WA State.
    Have informed several forums of what is going on, Hunter is a tool he was against HB1016 -2011 too.
     
  10. p35

    p35 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    998
    Location:
    Puget Sound
    Just got this:

    Thanks for your comments. HB 2067 was just introduced by Rep. Hunter, Chair of the Ways and Means Committee, as we look at options to balance our $5+ billion budget shortfall. HB 2067 was originally scheduled for a public hearing this week, but it has been removed from the hearing schedule. If the bill doesn't get a hearing and come up for a vote in committee, it will "die." Therefore, I think it's very likely that HB 2067 won't move any further in the legislative process this session.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page