Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Wanta Hunta Wolf?

Discussion in 'Hunting' started by Baba Louie, Jan 12, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Baba Louie

    Baba Louie Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    3,831
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070112/ap_on_re_us/wolf_hunting

    By JESSE HARLAN ALDERMAN, Associated Press Writer
    Thu Jan 11, 10:46 PM ET

    BOISE, Idaho - Idaho's governor said Thursday he will support public hunts to kill all but 100 of the state's gray wolves after the federal government strips them of protection under the Endangered Species Act.
    Gov. C.L. "Butch" Otter told The Associated Press that he wants hunters to kill about 550 gray wolves. That would leave about 100 wolves, or 10 packs, according to a population estimate by state wildlife officials.

    The 100 surviving wolves would be the minimum before the animals could again be considered endangered.

    "I'm prepared to bid for that first ticket to shoot a wolf myself," Otter said earlier Thursday during a rally of about 300 hunters.

    Otter complained that wolves are rapidly killing elk and other animals essential to Idaho's multimillion-dollar hunting industry. The hunters, many wearing camouflage clothing and blaze-orange caps, applauded wildly during his comments.

    Suzanne Stone, a spokeswoman for the advocacy group Defenders of Wildlife in Boise, said Otter's proposal would return wolves to the verge of eradication.

    "Essentially he has confirmed our worst fears for the state of Idaho: That this would be a political rather than a biological management of the wolf population," Stone said. "There's no economic or ecological reason for maintaining such low numbers. It's simple persecution."

    Wolves were reintroduced to the northern Rocky Mountains a decade ago after being hunted to near-extinction. More than 1,200 now live in the region.

    The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service plans to start removing federal protections from gray wolves in Montana and Idaho in the next few weeks.

    A plan drafted by Idaho's wildlife agency calls for maintaining a minimum of 15 wolf packs — higher than Otter's proposal of 10 packs.

    Jeff Allen, a policy adviser for the state Office of Species Conservation, said 15 wolf packs would allow "a cushion" between the surviving wolf population and the minimum number that federal biologists would allow before the animals are again considered endangered.

    Allen said Otter and state wildlife officials agree on wolf strategy and will be able to reach a consensus on specific numbers.

    "You don't want to be too close to 10 because all of a sudden when one (wolf) is hit by a car or taken in defense of property, you're back on the list," Allen said.


    Any pros or cons on this? On one hand, elk, deer, etc. On the other, vanishing predators, yada yada.
    Any way to stike a win/win balance? Or is that what the gov is (ahem) shooting for?
     
  2. calzoom

    calzoom Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2004
    Messages:
    147
    Location:
    Right here, Right now.
    So where do Wolves fit in the scheme of predators?

    If the wolves go away do the coyotes take over? Or is it feral dogs?

    Why did the early Settlers try to eradicate wolves?

    Inquiring minds,,blah, blah!:scrutiny: :scrutiny:
     
  3. Cosmoline

    Cosmoline Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    23,648
    Location:
    Los Anchorage
    It's the same old vile pandering, and the idiots are eating it up. Guys like this gov. are as bad as the enviros. Both have extremely immature attitudes towards the predators. The Treadwell types want to hug them, and these guys want to slaughter as many as possible.
     
  4. Baba Louie

    Baba Louie Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    3,831
    Somewhere there's gotta be a fine line to tread where all three (man, 4-legged predator and prey) can co-exist. Maybe. Maybe not. Ethical dilemma.

    Where I like the idea of wolves in the wild, they gotta eat something. Every day. Elk tastes good. So does deer.

    Be interesting to know the statistics involved. Gonna have to hunt up Idaho's Dept of Fish & Game and see if they've got any thoughts or words of wisdom...
    http://fishandgame.idaho.gov/
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2007
  5. H&Hhunter

    H&Hhunter Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2003
    Messages:
    9,142
    No matter what Gov. "Butch" of Idaho thinks. That was about the most stupid thing he could have said. He has just probably set the declassification process of the wolf back about 100 years.

    IDIOT......:banghead:
     
  6. waffentomas

    waffentomas Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2003
    Messages:
    261
    Location:
    Blue State
    H&H got it right. I want to go plug a couple of those furballs, too. But now we'll never get a chance to (legally) kill some.

    Moron. Shouldv'e kept his mouth shut, let 'em get delisted and then open season, baby.
     
  7. MikeWSC

    MikeWSC Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2006
    Messages:
    143
    Location:
    Michigan
    Arrrrrggggghhhhh:cuss: :cuss: :banghead: :banghead:
    Why, oh why, do doorknobs like this have to open their mouth.

    Yes, I'd hunt wolf. Although I've never hunted them, I'm sure it would be a challenging hunt. In Michigan, our wolf population has gotten to the point
    where a hunt could be started. Although I would not want to see the population drop to 100 animals!!!

    We know it would have to be deregulated first, and second, it would be up to the states wildlife biologests to determine how many animals could be taken.


    Mike
     
  8. Cosmoline

    Cosmoline Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    23,648
    Location:
    Los Anchorage
    There's a big difference between hunting and extermination.
     
  9. Baba Louie

    Baba Louie Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    3,831
    From their own website I find this...
    and
    OK, it's from one of their kids publications called "Wildlife Express" I found on the IF&G website. Certainly makes sense to me.
    http://fishandgame.idaho.gov/cms/news/newsletters/wild_express/may06.pdf
    So the question is, will culling 80% be enough or too much? I guess the answer depends on if you're a hunter, a rancher or... not. I wonder if IF&G will echo their boss or will sing a different tune than their published educational brochure and also I wonder, what IS the magical number based on ethics and economics?
     
  10. shadowalker

    shadowalker Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    640
    Location:
    Idaho
    There are a lot of people in Idaho that want to see the wolves gone because they make it "too hard" for them to get an elk. Personally I don't have a problem with wolves and was glad to see them reintroduced, though I do believe they should be responsibly managed just like any other animal.

    For only being in office a little while Butch has put his foot in his mouth already (he was partially sucking up to the crowd of that was mostly anti-wolf) though he is better than the governor had who has now gone back to being the lieutenant governor.

    It is kind of funny to watch the over the top anti hunters go crazy about this though :D.
     
  11. Cosmoline

    Cosmoline Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    23,648
    Location:
    Los Anchorage
    In fairness, I think wolves and brown bears need to be reintroduced to California, Oregon and Washington as well as the mountain states.
     
  12. rbernie
    • Contributing Member

    rbernie Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2004
    Messages:
    20,681
    Location:
    Norra Texas
    I was thinkin' that they should be introduced to every community within seventy five miles of I-95. :evil:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page