Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Washington State I-594 is Firearm Registration

Discussion in 'Activism' started by savage1r, Jul 22, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. savage1r

    savage1r Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    322
    Petitioners began hanging out at my local grocery stores and were attempting to get people to sign. I decided to download and read the document that is being proposed and I am EXTREMELY upset at the legislation this is shaping up to be. This video is my partial analysis of the language of the initiative and I encourage you all to read it and please share the video with your friends and lets spread the awareness about this dangerous initiative.

    VIDEO LINK
     
  2. sidheshooter

    sidheshooter Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2007
    Messages:
    1,963
    Location:
    NW
    Here we go. I think a lot of us knew that a fight was brewing in WA next. Just read through the text; I'll need to take another stab at it when I have more time, but I agree about being upset.
     
  3. savage1r

    savage1r Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    322
    I can't stand dishonest legislation masquerading around as something it's not. This bill has nothing but crap in it and should never see the light of day.
     
  4. silvermane_1

    silvermane_1 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2012
    Messages:
    92
    Location:
    burien WA
    darn it, those folks in Olympia are at it again.
     
  5. Ryanxia

    Ryanxia Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2010
    Messages:
    4,415
    Location:
    'MURICA!
    Care to summarize what's wrong with the Bill for those of us that can't click on a video link at work. :D
     
  6. savage1r

    savage1r Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    322
    It's universal background checks plus firearm registration for every pistol transfer (you must have a CPL or written permission from the local LEO to purchase a pistol). If you hand your firearm to someone other than your immediate family at anywhere other than an approved gun range, you are a criminal. If you fail to register your dead spouses pistol within 60 days, you are a criminal. There's a new tax to pay for everything. There's a new state background check system. That's what I can list off the top of my head.
     
  7. 2bfree

    2bfree Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2012
    Messages:
    375
    Location:
    Washington
    Initiative is what it is and has no chance in Olympia then goes to a public vote and that will have a good chance of passing (IMOP) Remember, King county ( Seattle ) is the largest voting block in the state and it is about as anti-gun as you get. Best thing to do is vote in 2014 when it comes up and make sure your friends do the same.
     
  8. Ryanxia

    Ryanxia Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2010
    Messages:
    4,415
    Location:
    'MURICA!
    Put your boots in the ground and dig in! Gotta push that tide back, several states have already this year.

    They can only take our freedom if we let them.
     
  9. sporterizin

    sporterizin Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2011
    Messages:
    7
    Here in Washington State we have the "pro" gun organizations offering up Initiative measure 591, titled "Protect Our Gun Rights." It all looks good other than what I noticed when I first read it when it was released. That was as follows:

    NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. A new section is added to chapter 9.41 RCW to read as follows: It is unlawful for any government agency to require background checks on the recipient of a firearm unless a uniform national standard is required.

    It is interesting that the "Protect Your Gun Rights" I-591, Section 2 "...unless a uniform standard is require." (which could be written by anyone from the EPA, or the UN) is being overlooked as a potential usurping of and forfeiting of the 10th Amendment of the Bill of Rights.
     
  10. BLB68

    BLB68 Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Messages:
    864
    Location:
    WA
    That video in the OP goes too far off topic to be effective. The guy really needs to get to the point in explaining the problems that are specific to I-594.

    I do appreciate the effort, but a shorter video that points out the hidden problems with the bill would pull in more of the fence sitters, whose votes we need. Thanks for your work on this.
     
  11. sporterizin

    sporterizin Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2011
    Messages:
    7
    I-594= Universal Background checks>Registration>Confiscation>Democide
     
  12. Deer_Freak

    Deer_Freak Member.

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2012
    Messages:
    662
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Here in NC we have to get a permit from the local sheriff or have a CCP. But we can get 5 purchase permits at once for $5 each and they are good forever unless you do something to fail a background check at the time of purchase. So once you have purchase permits there is no waiting period. You just buy a pistol like a long gun until your permits are gone. To be frank, I would rather wait 24 hours for purchase permits one time in 5 than have a brady waiting period on every purchase. Most counties have a purchase permit ready the next business day.

    Personally, I wouldn't mind if a few people had to wait an extra day for a purchase permit. We have one deputy that will be on desk duty for the rest of his life from a helicopter crash. Now, we have another deputy on desk duty for an indefinite length of time due to a car accident. Things going fast in the office are nice but not due to our deputies being injured. They both have a family that loves them and they are respected members of our community.
     
    Last edited: Aug 3, 2013
  13. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    48,352
    Location:
    0 hrs east of TN
    I don't know why you'd try to tie to a national standard since it already exists in the form of the fed mandated Brady check (which also provides that national standard). The language may be intended to limit the requirements of the background check to the Brady, but that's not clearly what is being said (many state, mine included, have added a couple of bits to the minimum the Brady calls out).
     
  14. sporterizin

    sporterizin Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2011
    Messages:
    7
    Well the problem starts when people forget that the only national standard is, ..."shall not be infringed." But here we have folks trying to impose something different and even legitimize anything other than what shall not be infringed upon. The 4473 which leads to the NICS is an infringement on what shall not be infringed upon...now we have those with the intent to completely, by state initiative, acquiesce to whomever and whatever they may come up with from the national level to infringe upon what shall not be infringed, without recourse. Does critical thinker in WA State really think that the liberal State Supreme Court will in any subsequent ruling, rule in favor any pretext of what shall not be infringed? I think not. To think otherwise is to whistle past the grave yard of all we have learned of those who would see themselves rule over free people.
     
  15. outerlimit

    outerlimit Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2007
    Messages:
    1,375
    Isn't the 2nd Amendment "written permission"? In what way is this possibly Constitutional..
     
  16. sporterizin

    sporterizin Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2011
    Messages:
    7
    "you must have a CPL or written permission from the local LEO to purchase a pistol"

    ^ This is an infringement when purchasing any firearm from an FFL. Any "new" uniform national standard, like Unversal background checks, will be infringements just as the current national standard, 4473---> NICS is an infringement.

    "Isn't the 2nd Amendment "written permission"? In what way is this possibly Constitutional.."

    ^ NO! The 2nd Amendment is an affirmation of a right, NOT permission granted by another human. One man's right cannot be owned by another, therefore cannot be given or taken. Now granted man has made paper law that punishes people for violating said man made paper law which does infringe upon a natural, God given right. To acquiesce, or compromise or think of giving up a right is wrong wrong, wrong for those who would be free.
     
  17. savage1r

    savage1r Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    322
    Thanks for the compliments, tips, and suggestions. I appreciate you guys watching and hopefully getting this info out to fellow Washingtonians. Keep up the fight and call your reps and congress people!
     
  18. 2bfree

    2bfree Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2012
    Messages:
    375
    Location:
    Washington
  19. outerlimit

    outerlimit Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2007
    Messages:
    1,375
    sporterizin, philisophically I agree, but if it wasn't written down in the Constitution, I doubt it's a right we would still have.
     
  20. mdauben

    mdauben Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2011
    Messages:
    2,163
    Location:
    Huntville, AL
    And I'd rather have neither, so its a good thing I live in a free state where I can walk into a gun store and walk out with any handgun, rifle or shotgun in the store within 15 minutes. ;)

    Why? Waiting periods are nothing but an additional burden on law abiding gun owners imposed by people who would just as soon confiscate every lawfully owned gun in the country. :mad:


    I'm sorry for these LEOs, but this has what do do with the discussion of purchase permits and waiting periods? :confused:
     
  21. 2bfree

    2bfree Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2012
    Messages:
    375
    Location:
    Washington
  22. Crashbox
    • Contributing Member

    Crashbox Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2010
    Messages:
    659
    Location:
    Lynden, Washington
    Yep, in my opinion I-594 is rotten to the core. Every effort must be made to defeat it.
     
  23. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    48,352
    Location:
    0 hrs east of TN
    The 2011 FBI Uniform Crime Report state statistics are at http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/table-5

    They show the rate of crime by state and reveal that Washington's rate of 2.4/100,000 population is far below NJ (4.3), NY (4.0), and CA (4.8), states with just the sort of proposed infringements on ownership. Table 5 also shows that these crimes are committed 10 to 1 as often in the major metro areas of Washington (137) vs. the state as a whole (162). Why exactly would Washington want to follow California when California's murder rate is twice that of Washington?
     
  24. savage1r

    savage1r Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    322
    This video comes from another YouTuber showing extremely clear evidence of signature manipulation in the gathering for support of I-594. This guy deserves a medal and whoever the out of state company is should be investigated for fraud.

    VIDEO LINK

    Bonus footage showing massive fraud
     
    Last edited: Oct 18, 2013
  25. silvermane_1

    silvermane_1 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2012
    Messages:
    92
    Location:
    burien WA
    if the Video shows fraud savage1r, we need to make sure it is shown to lawmakers.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page