Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Water expansion test part 2

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by Steve H, May 31, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Steve H

    Steve H Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,328
    Location:
    Southern Utah
    It worked.

    32 gallon trash can full to the top with water. Shot from 5 feet above the water.

    230 gr. .45 Winchester Ranger "T - Series" & the same on the right but +P
     

    Attached Files:

  2. TurtlePhish

    TurtlePhish Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2011
    Messages:
    2,099
    Location:
    The (Un)Constitution(al) State
    Ouch.

    Those look really cool.

    How much water did you get back in the face?
     
  3. Steve H

    Steve H Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,328
    Location:
    Southern Utah
    None............the top of the trash can was about a foot below the edge of the deck. I put a 4' X 4' chunk of 3/4" plywood between me and the rail. My arm hardly got wet.
     
  4. TurtlePhish

    TurtlePhish Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2011
    Messages:
    2,099
    Location:
    The (Un)Constitution(al) State
    Good planning, there. Think it'd work with a rifle?
     
  5. Steve H

    Steve H Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,328
    Location:
    Southern Utah
    I was shooting my 4" XD. I would think any rifle would be a total different outcome. One you would not want. I figure (rough guess) that load was leaving the barrel at about 1000 fps. Most center fire rifles are a lot faster and might need more water depth to slow down the bullet. Maybe the experts can give better info.
     
  6. wkumatt

    wkumatt Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2011
    Messages:
    178
    Location:
    Bowling Green, KY
    They've tried this with a rifle on mythbusters. If memory serves they did .223, .308, and .50 bmg. In all of them the bullet disintegrated in the first few inches of water. They contended that super sonic rounds would disintegrate with the sudden decceleration.


    Sent from my PB99400 using Tapatalk 2
     
  7. Ben86

    Ben86 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    3,185
    Location:
    MS, USA
    That's cool. Did you use a metal or plastic trash can. I thought about using a plastic trashcan, but am worried the hydrostatic pressure would destroy it.

    Keep in mind that water expansion results are most often more fantastic than actual results in living tissue, but it's still a good indicator.
     
  8. Steve H

    Steve H Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,328
    Location:
    Southern Utah

    I used an OLD plastic trash can............no damage to it at all.

    The one thing that surprise me a lot is how much more the +P peeled back and behind the base of the bullet
     
  9. firesky101

    firesky101 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,433
    Location:
    California
    This, but I would be worried about all that energy breaking a plastic trash can with a rifle round.
     
  10. Ben86

    Ben86 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    3,185
    Location:
    MS, USA
    That little extra boost of velocity does speed up expansion.
     
  11. CountryUgly

    CountryUgly Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2011
    Messages:
    613
    Location:
    The Dirty South
    Cool....
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page