nettlle
Contributing Member
Enough mags for a 100 round range session for each rifle and pistol. I keep them oiled and in desk drawers in my garage.
I was supposed to keep count? Whoops.Being a survivor of the Clinton AWB and recalling the then high prices and limited availability of quality pre-ban era magazines. It shaped my buying and storage habits for mags.
I try to keep minimum amount of mags for certain number of guns and I'm always on the hunt for more of 'em when prices are good.
Guns like my Berettas, GLOCKs, ARs, and Minis have a literal pile of magazines. Others likey Luger or VP70, have a bare number of four mags. But the majority of handguns have on average between six to ten mags. My hunting rifles like the BLR and 7600 have two mags each.
They're all tagged and bagged and stored in totes next to the rest of the gun stuff.
View attachment 1229974
View attachment 1229973
View attachment 1229972
SameHa, Great Minds Think Alike! I'm even using the exact same containers
I think you can have enough but honestly I don't take you to never really have too many.You can never have enough magazines, period.
And truly, that's what probably makes the most sense -- thinking in terms of how many you're gonna carry with you if the worst possible scenario presents itself? And unless you're shooting more than a couple hundred rounds per each individual firearm you take to the range, likely you're just an average citizen who still has a lot of new magazines still in the factory wrappers on a closet shelf...My minimum is 6 per gun. What I mostly have is Glock 19 magazines and I think I'm pretty close to 30 of those which should be more than I will ever need for the rest of my life.
Again in my opinion, after a certain point you're better off putting the money into ammunition.
I have speed loaders, and moonclips. Lots and lots of both.Is 6 enough ... are 12 too many ...
Revolvers Solve the problem nicely ... no magazines required !
Gary
Man, I forgot that single stack Shield mags are now not cool. I'm going to start rummaging through the bargain boxes for .40 S&W Shield mags.Does it matter the type or construction though? More is always better, but springs and followers can be replaced too. Most proposed state bans forbid transfers so that’s not really a great investment like the 1994 AWB era.
I do tend to accumulate the inexpensive ones from the “table-o-treasure” at every gun store. The $5-10 S&W Shield mags are fairly easy to find now.
An entire duffle bag full of NIW mags? Yeah, that's a bit over the top. Sure, my GLOCKs have a pile of mags. But they've all been used and since I have a pile of GLOCKs themselves, the pile of mags when divided per gun comes out to like 10 mags per gun.I think you can have enough but honestly I don't take you to never really have too many.
Then again, I remember this discussion coming up on Glocktalk and one of the respondents literally showed a duffel bag full Glock magazines still in the packaging.
In my opinion that's wasting money but it's his money to waste not mine.
My minimum is 6 per gun. What I mostly have is Glock 19 magazines and I think I'm pretty close to 30 of those which should be more than I will ever need for the rest of my life.
Again in my opinion, after a certain point you're better off putting the money into ammunition.
If we are invalid by land from a military force our military and L.E. could not handle, alien invasion, or a high round could competition shooter who's hard on their mags would be be reason to "require" more, but I agree that mags that aren't being abused will last.had me wondering about whether I might need more, but there would need to be an alien invasion to really "need" a bunch.