Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

what do you think of this bullet (boolet?)

Discussion in 'Handloading and Reloading' started by gofastman, Sep 18, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. gofastman

    gofastman Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    1,062
    Location:
    MN
  2. rcmodel

    rcmodel Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    59,082
    Location:
    Eastern KS
    The Lyman #429215 Ray Thompson GC design is older then I am, and it has survived that long for good reason.

    But you certainly don't need a gas-check bullet for .44 Spl loads.

    And if the bullets are hard enough alloy for 1,500 FPS loads, they are going to be too hard for 800 FPS loads, and you will likely get some leading.

    I'd try those for the barn burners, or try Missouri Bullet Brinell 18 hardness Keith's.
    http://www.missouribullet.com/details.php?prodId=103&category=5&secondary=12&keywords=

    And try Missouri Bullet Brinell 12 harness for some simple plain lead .44 Spl bullets.
    http://www.missouribullet.com/results.php?pageNum_rsCWResults=0&category=5&secondary=12

    $46 per 500 is way better then $76 per 500!

    rc
     
  3. gofastman

    gofastman Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    1,062
    Location:
    MN
    is there any reason not to use a gas check?
     
  4. Walkalong

    Walkalong Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    46,744
    Location:
    Alabama
    Money down the drain. Seriously, those buggers are almost as much as jacketed bullets these days.
     
  5. Galil5.56

    Galil5.56 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2007
    Messages:
    1,094
    Cost is a big reason, especially in the last few years as brand name gas check prices have gone completely insane. I cast 240 grain LSWC, .430" diameter bullets, and only use gas checks when I am driving them at top .44 mag velocities... Even then if sized right, all but the very softest alloy will work OK if the lube is up to the job. Another minus to using gas checks is that they can and do fly off after they leave the barrel, and can destroy a chronograph... I found out firsthand that they have plenty enough zip to do this.

    Lastly, that does seem like a nice bullet you show, and if you might want an alternate non gas check type at 240 grains, take a look at http://www.mastercastbullets.com/home.html

    Mike will ship you 500 if that is all you might need, for the USPS small box flat rate cost, saving you about $8 over a lot of the competition, and nobody I have seen beats his satisfaction warranty.
     
  6. bds

    bds Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2010
    Messages:
    13,655
    Location:
    Northwest Coast
    A new book (free pdf) by Glen Fryxell has some excellent chapters that cover gas-checked vs plain based lead bullet (chapter 10), leading (chapter 7) and the Keith SWC bullets (chapter 12) - http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=615067

    Here are some excerpts from the book as to why gas check may not be necessary for .357/.44 Magnum up to 1500 fps:

     
  7. Hondo 60
    • Contributing Member

    Hondo 60 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2009
    Messages:
    5,324
    Location:
    Manitowoc, WI
    That seems awful expensive.

    I'm with rcmodel...

    The 12 BHN from MBC for 44spl
    & the 18 BHN for 44 Magnum.

    Like he said "$46 per 500 is way better then $76 per 500!"
     
  8. 35 Whelen

    35 Whelen Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    2,748
    Location:
    North Texas
    I cast and shoot the .358" version of that bullet. I mostly use it in my full house .357 loads, but it'll certainly work in my .38. I also cast a 150 gr HP with gas check that I use exclusively in my .38. If you're looking for versatility, I think that bullet would be the ticket.

    $76 per 500 might seem expensive, but it's still cheaper than buying and keeping two different bullets.

    You must be a reloader, have you given any thought to taking up bullet casting? Once your equipment is paid for, and if you can scrounge your own lead as I do, your bullets are pretty much free. I've even made a die (or you can buy them)from which I make my own gas checks out of those aluminum "No Trespassing" signs. .30 caliber checks cost me about .2¢, that two-tenths of one cent, apiece. I don't make my own .35 caliber checks yet as I have a couple thousand.
    I shoot cast in everything FOR everything except deer hunting where shots will likely be over 100 yds., elk hunting and rifles like my Mini and SKS's.

    35W
     
  9. gofastman

    gofastman Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    1,062
    Location:
    MN
    I think I may be heading that way! Its just sooo cheap, after you get the equipment.
    I work for VW, so wheel weights are more or less unlimited, for now.
    slight thread drift:
    a lot of shops, at least the "green" ones, are moving to lead free (clay based, I think) stick on weights, they work very well, but they're not lead.
    there are still literally millions of pounds of lead weights out there, so we should be fine for a decade or two ;)
     
  10. 35 Whelen

    35 Whelen Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    2,748
    Location:
    North Texas
    I
    Very cheap. I can load a box of 50 ea. 38 Special plinking/target loads for about $2 - $3 per box. In addition to making my own gas checks, I also make my own bulet lube. Incidently, both the homemade checks and lube make for some incredibly accurate bullets (all 100 yd. targets with open sights):
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    35W
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page