Sent this
...to NPR, MSNBC and CNN. Got tired of hearing "gunman" and "gun violence", usual victimspeak. My question was simple:
Virginia Tech-4/16/2007
What kind of environment should we ensure our children are in every day? We send our children away to this wonderful, sunlit, progressive adult institution where they can thrive, and what do we find? It can’t keep our children safe. It won’t teach them how to fend for or defend themselves. The security personnel don’t even know a shooting has taken place, much less where. And the staff is gutless and cowardly. So ask yourself:
Where were the ADULTS? When my daughter steps foot on that campus, doesn't EVERY adult there bear a responsibility to protect and defend her, and every other student? Scott Hendricks, associate professor of engineering science and mechanics at Virginia Tech, barricaded himself in his office "until the police broke the door down". He admitted on the phone he has two children at the school. Did he go to find them and protect them, or any of the other students? No, he cowered in his office till the police "rescued" him. The janitor ran down the stairs, not to get help, but to escape. Meanwhile, Professor Librescu was blocking the door to protect the students. He was killed with them. The University is at fault for making the campus a gun free zone--do you think a person carrying legally could have made a difference? Could 28 of those people still be alive but for University policy? 29? If my daughter had been killed there and the University and professors, et al, failed to protect her, could I sue for criminal misconduct and wrongful death due to a University policy which denied her the tools and access to trained professionals that would have ensured her life?
So many stories about the "gunman". When Russel Weller ran his car into the crowds at the Farmers Market in California killing nine people, he wasn’t called the "carman", he was called the driver. Language is power, and somebody’s bias is showing.