Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

What is the general consensus on the HK USP compact?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by Jordan85, Sep 11, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Jordan85

    Jordan85 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    Messages:
    221
    As some of you may know from my other posts, I am in the market for my first conceal carry weapon.

    I shot the USP compact today and it felt great in my hands and lined up very naturally for me.

    I was just wondering what the general consensus (pros and cons, durability, etc) the public had on this gun.
     
  2. wbwanzer

    wbwanzer Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2006
    Messages:
    1,157
    Just my 2 cents, but I had one in 9mm about 8 or 9 years ago. I could not shoot well with that gun at all compared to my S&W revolver. Got rid of it. At the time I bought it I also looked at the P7. Didn't get it because I thought it was too expensive. Wish I had gotten the P7. I'd probably still have it.
     
  3. High Planes Drifter

    High Planes Drifter Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2006
    Messages:
    1,204
    Its a nice gun. My brother has one and its a really nice gun.
     
  4. gotime242

    gotime242 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Messages:
    561
    My friend just got one due to H&K's pilot program (straight from hk @ $499 shipped)...but its the DAO model with LEM trigger. It has no safety and is in .40

    I hate it. The LEM DAO trigger is horrible. And it just doesnt shoot naturally ::for me:: I would need a lot more practice to group anything close to what i shoot with what seems to be most guns out there.

    I really think its a nice, quality, good looking gun, but i would have to get it in DA/SA, with the standard safety, and probably in 9mm.
     
  5. SouthpawShootr

    SouthpawShootr Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    2,627
    Location:
    Chesapeake, VA
    I have 2. One in 9mm. One in .40. They're nice, high quality, but IMO a bit overpriced. I left both of mine standard variant 1. My father had his 9mm converted to LEM after getting a P2000. I don't like the LEM. Just my preference. I don't care for the DAK in the Sig line either.
     
  6. twofourthree73

    twofourthree73 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2008
    Messages:
    192
    Location:
    VA
    I have one in 9mm. It's solidly made, ultra reliable. I have not had one malfunction in over 10 years. I've put maybe 1500 rounds through it and it still looks and feels brand new. It's not an ideal carry gun as it's bulky and a little heavy. The trigger is a little rough and heavy and I've never shot well with it, but that's probably due to operator error more than anything. I'm used to rifle accuracy and my ruger mark II which can hit a pop can at 50 yards, so a short barrel defensive pistol never impresses me in the accuracy department.
     
  7. Khyron

    Khyron Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2008
    Messages:
    48
    Location:
    Tacoma, WA
    I got my USPc 9mm back in June and have since taken it to a 4 day pistol course where I fired 2000 rounds through it with no problems. Knocked it around and dumped it in the dirt several times as well. I dont think its too bulky for carry with a cover garment like an unbuttoned, button down shirt. For warmer weather when I'm only wearing a tshirt I carry a P7 IWB. Anyway I shoot the USPc pretty well now although I'm sure a pistol with 5 inch barrel is probably more accurate but we are not talking about full size service weapons here. I've got the version 1 so I can carry in condition 1 which is great. I dont like the DA trigger pull but then again I dont like the double action pull on any DA/SA pistol. The only thing strange about it is when on reloading if I slam a new mag in forceably it usually drops the slide. Doesnt bother me.
     
  8. skinewmexico

    skinewmexico Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    2,621
    Location:
    West Texas
    10 years and 1500 rounds? You need to shoot more.
     
  9. 10-Ring

    10-Ring Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,037
    Location:
    California
    I've had one for 7 years in 9mm -- almost 9000 rounds. I prefer the fullsize bigger brother, but no real complaints.
    I wouldn't mind adding a compact 45 to the stable :cool:
     
  10. usp9

    usp9 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2005
    Messages:
    3,646
    Location:
    Bowling Green, Va
    A very high quality, reliable pistol, the USPc. For concealed carry I use the slightly smaller P2000SK though.

    Sounds like a match made... go for it.
     
  11. 30-06 lover

    30-06 lover Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2006
    Messages:
    584
    Location:
    CA
    The USP is somewhat large for a "compact", but it is a fine pistol. You may want to think about that for carry pistol.

    I have a full size and my friend a compact. They have both been 100% reliable thus far. They are more expensive than many other ultra reliable pistols, but the USP was what I wanted therefore worth it for me.
     
  12. gbelleh

    gbelleh Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,747
    Location:
    Kansas
    I love my USP .45c. It's my winter carry gun. It's been 100% reliable and is extremely accurate.
     
  13. Tribal

    Tribal Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2007
    Messages:
    679
    Location:
    Virginia 757
    I've got a USPc9 and while it's a great shooter and one of the guns with which I'm most accurate, it's not all that great for concealed carry unless you normally wear very baggy clothes or bulky jacket. For concealment of something that size, I prefer a Hi-Power or a 1911, although a Kahr or a single-stack Glock* might be okay.

    *GLOCK. Whatever.
     
  14. Exmasonite

    Exmasonite Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2006
    Messages:
    561
    General consensus on an internet gun board, eh? Pretty lofty expectations.

    On a serious note, the HK is a very nice gun. My buddy has one in 9mm and has had no problems with it. I enjoy shooting it given the opportunity. That being said, here are my 2 big concerns about it:

    1) Cost. Not sure it's worth that $$.

    2) If you ever were to have an issue with it (which are reportedly rare), HK customer service is rumored to be very problematic.
     
  15. gc70

    gc70 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    Messages:
    2,980
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Jordan85, here is something to consider: in comparison to a Sig 239, the USPc is 0.21" longer, has a 0.1" shorter height (with a flat magazine floor plate), is approximately the same width, is 4 ounces lighter (unloaded), and holds 5 more rounds in 9mm. I can't say much about a direct concealed carry comparison because I am waiting for a holster for the USPc. :eek:
     
  16. bwavec

    bwavec Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2007
    Messages:
    241
    The USP series (both full size and compact) has been nothing less than 100% reliable for me. I have thousands of rounds through both the USP & USP compact, 0 failures. I have trusted my life to these pistols. 100 % Reliability (with very little care) is a very desirable for a carry weapon. I know I can count on my HK's.
     
  17. markk

    markk Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2007
    Messages:
    490
    Location:
    NE Florida
    I have the USPc .45 and love it, a great pistol.
     
  18. VARifleman

    VARifleman Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2005
    Messages:
    1,533
    Location:
    Northern VA
    One friend of mine had a USPc .45. I would have to qualify my thoughts of the pistols as overwhelmingly mediocre. For what you would spend on a USP, you can pick up something quite a bit better.

    But then again, I suck and they hate me. :neener:
     
  19. Redlg155

    Redlg155 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,724
    Location:
    NW Florida
    I've owned 2 HK USP Compacts, .40 and .45 in my life and eventually sold both. It wasn't because they weren't good pistols, in fact they were excellent, I just didn't like the trigger pull.

    I now own a HK P2000sk in .40 and absolutely love it. Although many dislike the V2 LEM trigger, I think it was a purchasing point for my individual weapon. Smooth through 3/4 of the length of travel with about 2 lbs of resistance followed by a stacking (approx 6 lbs) before the hammer releases. It's not a target trigger, but for a concealed carry weapon it is perfect. I'd venture to say that if you put two new shooters side by side , one with the LEM trigger and one with the standard DA first trigger pull of a USP, I'd bet money that the LEM shooter would have a higher first shot probability. Every USP that I've come across had a horrible DA trigger pull. But then this is my personal experience. There may be others that are satisfied with the first DA shot on the USP C.
     
  20. crankshop1000

    crankshop1000 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2007
    Messages:
    372
    Since you said carry pistol, I dumped my USPc for a Colt Defender. MUCH lighter and easier to conceal.I liked the trigger option on mine, but didn't like the trigger feel either sa or da. You might also look at the Springfield Micro Compact in .45 or an EMP in 9mm before you jump on the HK platform.
     
  21. onebigelf

    onebigelf Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2006
    Messages:
    419
    USP 45 was my issue sidearm in the service. Good, accurate, reliable pistol. Loved the nite sights.

    John
     
  22. Disaster

    Disaster Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    402
    A lot of compacts, based on full sized service pistols, have the same issue...they are pretty thick. I find that their main advantage is their shorter grip, but a thinner gun is considerably more concealable.

    Wish more companies would come out with modern single stacks....like the Walther PPS or the Kahr PM9.
     
  23. jehu

    jehu Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2005
    Messages:
    396
    It's a fine weapon but I would take a hard look at the P2000Sk for carry!
     
  24. benderx4

    benderx4 Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,276
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    First of all, take my opinions with a grain of salt. I currently own 8 HKs so I am a HUGE fan.

    My USPc 45 is a sweet shooting 45 that has never had a failure - ever. Probably over 5000 rounds through that puppy.

    I have to agree with the posters who recommend the P2000sk for carry, however. Smaller, available in 9mm or 40SW, very accurate, and still available in a number of variants. (LEM, DA/SA, etc.) Mine is Variant 3 and it took awhile, but now I LOVE the decocker next to the hammer.

    As for price, out of all my HKs, the ONLY one I bought new was the P2000sk - at a gun show - awesome deal. All the others are used and in amazing shape. My experience has been that HK owners tend to take care of their guns - plus the guns themselves are indestructible.

    Finally, my carry gun lately has been a HK P7. You might want to get one of these while you can - no longer made. Dimensions very close to a Walther PPS, 8+1 in 9mm. They heat up after 50 rounds but who cares if you use it for carry and practice occasionally. Plus, they only go up in value so it's a great investment!

    Good luck with your decision!!
     
  25. Shipwreck

    Shipwreck Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Messages:
    3,617
    Location:
    Texas
    I really like mine!

    [​IMG]
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page