Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

What is your favorite BUIS, and why?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Tim the student, Jan 2, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Tim the student

    Tim the student Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2009
    Messages:
    3,427
    Location:
    IA
    I plan on getting a set for an upcoming AR build (or building a lower and pinning an upper to it rather).

    I'm familiar with the Matech from my time in the Army, and they worked ok, but I was almost always was actually using optics with the BUIS down.

    I think I would prefer flip ups, but I'm not dead set on that. Later, I plan on adding optics to it.

    Thoughts?
     
  2. downingducksdowneast

    downingducksdowneast Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2009
    Messages:
    31
    Troy industry sights are my favorite, but I have both matech and magpul BUIS in service. Like you said, they are backups so other than some use here and there to verify zero and keeping me from getting rusty they don't get used.
     
  3. Onmilo

    Onmilo Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2004
    Messages:
    9,773
    Location:
    Illinois`
    Daniel Defense A1 non folding and the Matech BUIS for folding because that is what I have on most of my rifles.
     
  4. StrutStopper

    StrutStopper Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2011
    Messages:
    633
    Troys are nice but I have a Magpul gen 2 on my AR. Rear only, I've got a fixed FSB.
     
  5. rbernie
    • Contributing Member

    rbernie Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2004
    Messages:
    20,682
    Location:
    Norra Texas
    I run the Mangonel rear sights on more ARs than any other BUIS - I prefer their simple design and large rear aperture.
     
  6. chad1043

    chad1043 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    Messages:
    464
    I also have the Magpul Gen 2. It was the only BUIS that fits under my scope.
     
  7. HKGuns

    HKGuns Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2004
    Messages:
    2,396
    Location:
    Bora Bora
    YHM because they lock up and lock down and have a large and small aperture.
     
  8. madcratebuilder

    madcratebuilder Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2007
    Messages:
    5,020
    Location:
    Northern Orygun
    Matech (usgi) has a low profile and well fit most scoped guns. Troy makes a nice set. If I buy any more I want to try the LMT A2 set.
     
  9. Ragnar Danneskjold

    Ragnar Danneskjold Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2007
    Messages:
    3,703
    Location:
    Arlington, Republic of Texas
    I prefer Magpul due to their low weight and ease of use. Yeah, I know the weight is negligible, but I put together a super light weight carbine and I think every saved oz. can make a difference.
     
  10. Tirod

    Tirod Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2008
    Messages:
    4,638
    Location:
    SW MO
    Carry handle A4 cut down. One bolt clamp on, milspec, co witness, no fumbling to get them up or down. Most optics mount forward anyway.

    You can pickup one used under $40.
     
  11. Z-Michigan

    Z-Michigan Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2008
    Messages:
    4,047
    Location:
    Michigan
    I'm quite happy with the MBUS. The Troy is a little nicer but not 2x nicer, and I prefer the spring loaded feature of the MBUS. I've also been happy with the Samson and MI for flips.

    For fixed rear I prefer the LMT. After that the DD and Troy fixed are both just fine, but the LMT gives you the elevation drum from an A2.
     
  12. buckhorn_cortez

    buckhorn_cortez Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2010
    Messages:
    532
    If you're going to put a scope or red dot sight on the rifle, then I'd look at Dueck Defense Rapid Transition Sights.

    No worries about being in the way of optical sights, no need to flip up and down to use. I have them on my AR 15 - they work just fine.
     
  13. Z-Michigan

    Z-Michigan Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2008
    Messages:
    4,047
    Location:
    Michigan
    They look like great sights, but $238 is a lot to spend on BUIS.
     
  14. henschman

    henschman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,880
    Location:
    Oklahoma City
    For a flip-up rear sight, I like the KAC 2-600m model. It does everything the carry handle sight does, but in a much smaller and fold-able package. It is one of the only flip-ups that is adjustable for elevation at the rear sight. The Matech does this too, but it doesn't have consistently-incremented clicks like the KAC does, and I've heard some negative things about the durability of the Matech. The KAC looks pretty hard to break. We'll see... I loaned mine to my friend who is in Afghanistan and has been seeing plenty of combat, so I imagine it will be pretty well "torture tested" when it gets back. He likes it a lot better than the issued Matech.
     
  15. sgtstryker

    sgtstryker Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2011
    Messages:
    401
    Location:
    Southwest Georgia
    I'm using theMagpul Gen 2 also, on two flattops. They work well, are durable enough for long range time. Won't break the bank, either..It's a personal choice.
     
  16. kfgk14

    kfgk14 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Messages:
    248
    Assuming emphasis on the BU in BUIS, Magpul MBUS's. I trust the optics I run implicitly, I don't worry about them at all. If iron's are all I get, I want the DD A1.5 rear sight and an F-marked front sight post.
     
  17. jmorris

    jmorris Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2005
    Messages:
    9,834
    The quick answer is "ones I don't have to use". A 1:00 version if I plan on going from optic to iron. The YHM's ar pretty solid, like others they don't always clear the optic but that depends on what you have for a primary.
     
  18. malakili

    malakili Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    180
    Location:
    Brevard
    Here's another vote for Magpul MBUS (rear sight). Sturdy, light, and gets the job done. I actually use one as the primary sight on my new AR build. They're sure accurate enough and hold zero well. Even though I don't have any optics, the super-low-profile folding function of the sight is handy for when I'm transporting or storing the rifle. If they're folded and out of the way it's less likely something will bump or snag on them.
     
  19. taliv

    taliv Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2004
    Messages:
    22,365
    i stopped using BUIS.

    none of the backups have the capability i need for longer range
    i can point well enough at extreme short range, and wouldn't have time to deploy them anyway

    so what's the point? just more weight afaik
     
  20. Tirod

    Tirod Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2008
    Messages:
    4,638
    Location:
    SW MO
    And, for the typical prices some charge for BUIS, you can buy a cheap red dot for backup.

    $238 is exactly why I bought a carry handle sight for $32 and cut it down. It's equally accurate and more durable. $200 more won't do anything better for BUIS, but will buy another red dot.

    If the front sight is mounted on the forearm rail its no longer a free float - the sights will move around with it from hand or sling pressure, instead of staying with the barrel and it's point of aim. There's no guarantee a float is perfectly rigid - if it was, we'd have them attached at both ends and fix the floppy barrel.
     
  21. Z-Michigan

    Z-Michigan Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2008
    Messages:
    4,047
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ah, but a cheap red dot is precisely the kind of aiming device that you really need a backup for.

    Frankly many people don't need BUIS period, because an optic failure means only going home from the range or hunting field to fix the optic. No big deal. BUIS is really for people who are going to be in a bad situation, or at least very unhappy, if the optic fails. Like soldiers, or someone who hiked for two days to their hunting location.

    I don't think this is right. While it's true that a FF forearm is not completely rigid and can move independently of the barrel, there really isn't a problem because the forearm still tends to be extremely rigid, and as long as there's no pressure on the barrel the relative movement between the two parts is usually tiny, not important for most non-precision purposes. Secondly, while I understand what you're saying about the possibility of relative movement, the forearm remains a free-floating forearm unless you do something to attach it to the barrel forward of the barrel nut. Mounting the sight on the forearm instead of the barrel does not change whether the barrel is free floating.
     
  22. Tim the student

    Tim the student Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2009
    Messages:
    3,427
    Location:
    IA
    Thanks for all the responses gents. Good stuff to think about in here.
     
  23. StrutStopper

    StrutStopper Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2011
    Messages:
    633
    How do you use a cheap red dot for backup? If your primary scope or red dot fails you ask the BGs to wait until you put on your cheap back-up and sight it in?
     
  24. Onmilo

    Onmilo Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2004
    Messages:
    9,773
    Location:
    Illinois`
    StrutStopper
    I made this picture up to illustrate there are a number of ways to mount sights and optics to an AR/M16 type rifle.
    Offset mounts made available after I did this picture make adding a small red dot optic easy.
    standard.gif

    Here is another manner that was all the rage, I tried it and did not care for the too heads up manner of sighting.
    standard.gif
    that's a Trijicon RMR mini dot on a TA01NSN ACOG.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page