Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

What makes a gun like this Massachusetts compliant?

Discussion in 'Legal' started by bushmaster1313, Nov 17, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. bushmaster1313

    bushmaster1313 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    3,573
    Location:
    Peoples Republik of New Jersey
  2. MedWheeler

    MedWheeler Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2008
    Messages:
    4,907
    Location:
    SouthEastern FL
    MA-compliance rules are abstract at best, and firearms must "make the cut" as they are introduced. Three of the most-prominent rules are that the gun must be certifiably "drop-safe" (no "second-strike" actions on semi-automatics), must have a LCI, and must have no magazines available that hold more than ten rounds (I think rimfire guns might be exempt, but I cannot be sure.)
    I'm pretty sure that they must also have a manual safety and a magazine-disconnect safety.

    Like in California, guns must be submitted for T & E by their makers to make the cut.

    Peruse here for more: http://www.mass.gov/eopss/firearms-reg-and-laws/
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 17, 2012
  3. bushmaster1313

    bushmaster1313 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    3,573
    Location:
    Peoples Republik of New Jersey
    Landing Craft, Infantry?
     
  4. FIVETWOSEVEN

    FIVETWOSEVEN Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2009
    Messages:
    5,051
    Loaded Chamber Indicator.
     
  5. SMMAssociates

    SMMAssociates Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    950
    Location:
    Youngstown, OH
    The 10# trigger is also required....

    (Apex Tactical can fix that, but I'm not sure how the MA authorities would react.)

    The Shield currently comes with all the other requirements as standard equipment. You can remove the thumb safety and magazine safety devices, though.

    My vote would be to use Apex's kit to improve the drop safety rather than remove it, but that's pretty easy, too.

    So, presuming the folks who have to bless the thing in Massachusetts did so, it's compliant. Size-wise, it's not a lot smaller than the M&P Compacts, which have long since been acceptable (when equipped with a heavy trigger). A thumb safety is available on the other M&P's, too, but I'm not sure if the MA compliant versions must have them.

    AFAIK, CA has the same requirements as MA when it applies to the Shield or other M&P series guns - about the only thing that can bite you might be the size of the gun.

    Toledo OH used to have a list of "approved" guns that didn't include my PPK/S. They didn't want "Saturday Night Specials", so legislated out a lot of smaller guns, etc. That the PPK/S was selling for something like $400 at the time didn't seem to register.

    DO ask somebody in MA about changing that trigger if you're thinking about it. It may not be legal to do so! Here in OH, there's no legal issue, but mucking with any manufacturer-supplied safety device may get you into problems in a Civil action should you use the thing. I doubt if anybody in OH would notice, but who knows....

    Regards,
     
  6. Ehtereon11B

    Ehtereon11B internet infantryman

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2012
    Messages:
    983
    California and Massachusetts are almost identical on their compliant handguns. The differences show on their rifles since California has a few more restrictions on magazine capacity and button hole magazine catches.
     
  7. BLB68

    BLB68 Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Messages:
    863
    Location:
    WA
    Doesn't come with a magazine safety by default. So, the main differences would be addition of a magazine safety, and a horrendous trigger weight.
     
  8. SMMAssociates

    SMMAssociates Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    950
    Location:
    Youngstown, OH
    BLB68:

    I thought the little guy came with a mag safety....

    Should be able to order one that way, though. Probably in combination with an MA-compliant trigger :( ....

    The other M&P's can easily be fitted with a mag safety if you really want one - I'm not sure about the Shield, but I'd bet the same parts would fit.

    (I'm not sure why you'd want the mag safety, either, but some people like them. YMMV.)

    Regards,
     
  9. BLB68

    BLB68 Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Messages:
    863
    Location:
    WA
    Well, mine didn't, so I'm assuming that it's the default setup, since I'm not in one of the states with extra requirements. I know they have a MA compliant version, though, so I assume if it's required there, that it'll have one.
     
  10. Teachu2

    Teachu2 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2012
    Messages:
    2,109
    Location:
    Keene, CA
    The Shield has yet to make it to the CA list.
     
  11. highlander 5

    highlander 5 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2006
    Messages:
    2,285
    Location:
    lynn,ma
    AFAIK there is no requirement for a mag disconnect,we have several versions of 1911 for sale here and none have a mag disconnect. As far as the 10# trigger pull goes that can be changed after you buy the pistol/revolver,that requriementis only needed on new pistols/revolvers. I have several pistols that have had their actions reworked and it's perfectly legal.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page