Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

What Sub $1K FFP scope?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Roadwild17, Jul 13, 2009.

?

What Sub $1K FFP scope?

  1. Falcon Menace 4-14 FFP

    2 vote(s)
    18.2%
  2. Weaver Tactical 3-15 FFP

    1 vote(s)
    9.1%
  3. SS 3x9 FFP

    2 vote(s)
    18.2%
  4. Other???

    6 vote(s)
    54.5%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Roadwild17

    Roadwild17 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2005
    Messages:
    1,143
    Location:
    Undisclosed
    Im running circles between what scope to go with.

    Originally I was going with a falcon menace 4-14X44 ffp in the mil/mil configuration. Then I noticed the new weaver tactical 3-15X50, FFP no info on the turrets (mil - 1/4 moa). Then I got a look at this post over on the hide http://www.snipershide.com/forum/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=1191777&page=1 down around 3/4 of the way, thats some pretty sharp glass to me.

    The gun is an AR that Im going to use in a DM role and possibly some paper punching out to 500 yds.

    I know the 3x9 would get me out to 500 yds (might have some problems with paper at 500 yds with only x9) and no side focus (looses tactCOOL points)

    The weaver has the low end x3 and high end x15 and the side focus (if even a purely ascetic thing) but no info on the turrets still. I think the glass would be good.

    The falcon has everything, but Im wondering about the glass quality and tracking of adjustments.

    So what do you think?
     
  2. Maverick223

    Maverick223 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2008
    Messages:
    11,262
    Location:
    28078
    The SS will give you the best quality at your price point as long as it is on par with the fixed power SSs (particularly the 10x), from the reviews that I have read thus far it appears to be just as good (or better). Personally, I would go with this one. :)

    Come on people...if you put other at least say what it is... :confused:
     
  3. lipadj46

    lipadj46 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2008
    Messages:
    1,884
    I voted SS because of the mil turrets and I have a soft spot for the SS brand (I think it's great SWFA saved the scope, stuck with it and continued to develop the new variable). If you want more magnification then go with the Weaver. I know people like the Falcon Menace but I just don't like chinese optics but that is just me.
     
  4. Roadwild17

    Roadwild17 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2005
    Messages:
    1,143
    Location:
    Undisclosed
    I would prefer Jap glass over chinese and german over jap, but its kinda low on the list
     
  5. P.B.Walsh

    P.B.Walsh Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2009
    Messages:
    2,287
    Location:
    Tuscaloosa,Alabama
    I thought the glass was Jap. on the Falcon, and the other componets are Chiness? Please correct me if I'm wrong.
     
  6. lipadj46

    lipadj46 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2008
    Messages:
    1,884
    That is what I have read.
     
  7. Maverick223

    Maverick223 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2008
    Messages:
    11,262
    Location:
    28078
    I believe it is Chinese, but comparitively good Chinese. :)
     
  8. lipadj46

    lipadj46 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2008
    Messages:
    1,884
    No it's Japanese glass, fully multicoated. Not sure which manufacturer they source it from.
     
  9. P.B.Walsh

    P.B.Walsh Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2009
    Messages:
    2,287
    Location:
    Tuscaloosa,Alabama
    How good are the Falcons compared to the Weavers?
     
  10. Roadwild17

    Roadwild17 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2005
    Messages:
    1,143
    Location:
    Undisclosed
    Any ranking on the glass?
     
  11. Maverick223

    Maverick223 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2008
    Messages:
    11,262
    Location:
    28078
    I'll take your word for it, I do know that the assembly is done in the UK, and have heard that the customer service is very good. :)

    I would rank it a four (out of what I don't know :neener:). I think it is about as good as Bushnell 3200 glass. I don't own one but that was my first impression.
     
  12. lipadj46

    lipadj46 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2008
    Messages:
    1,884
    If you read the snipercentral review they say that, they also claim the manufacturer claims 94% transmittance but they don't say what wavelength. And only the final assembly and QC is done in the UK whatever that means. I would be curious to see what the official "made in" sticker reads.
     
  13. Maverick223

    Maverick223 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2008
    Messages:
    11,262
    Location:
    28078
    That they put the stickers on it and package it in the box. :neener:
     
  14. lipadj46

    lipadj46 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2008
    Messages:
    1,884
    Yeah probably something very close to that.
     
  15. stubbicatt

    stubbicatt Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2007
    Messages:
    3,413
    Location:
    Colorado
    IOR Valdada

    I have one of their 2.5x10 M9 reticle scopes with FFP and reticle illumination. It is a very nice scope.

    Has mil graduated turrets, which are really quite a bit easier to use than MOA, IMO.
     
  16. nhm16

    nhm16 Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2009
    Messages:
    94
    I'm curious to see how the SS 3-9 compares to my IOR 2.5-10x44, which can be had for $900 or so, and is a great scope with a great reticle.
     
  17. Roadwild17

    Roadwild17 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2005
    Messages:
    1,143
    Location:
    Undisclosed
    Well then its a sub $1K scope if its ffp., where can someone pick oue up like that at?
     
  18. Maverick223

    Maverick223 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2008
    Messages:
    11,262
    Location:
    28078
    I think Scott carries them at Liberty Optics, but I am not certain. P.S. IOR (at least the SFP variety) is good stuff. :)
     
  19. Roadwild17

    Roadwild17 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2005
    Messages:
    1,143
    Location:
    Undisclosed
    Dug around a bit, seams there may be some problems with the IOR FFP stuff. Anyone have info on that?
     
  20. pdd614

    pdd614 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2007
    Messages:
    386
    Location:
    dfw
    no problems with the 2.5x10 ffp. the 3-18 ffp has a 10% failure rate, and i would stay away from that scope.

    ior is redesigning the 2.5x10 ffp mil/mil to have a 10 mil per turn elevation turret. this should be a really nice scope at around 1k
     
  21. Roadwild17

    Roadwild17 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2005
    Messages:
    1,143
    Location:
    Undisclosed
    Anyone have any info on the weaver tactical FFP. specifically the turrets (mil or moa)
     
  22. lipadj46

    lipadj46 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2008
    Messages:
    1,884
    There is one model that supposedly had some birthing problems. 2.5-10x42 or 4-14x50 IORs are hands down as rock solid a FFP scope you will find.

    On the Weavers FFP scopes the info is on their website. The turrets are standard MOA. The more I read about the Super Sniper variable the more impressed I am with it and will buy one soon.
     
  23. Maverick223

    Maverick223 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2008
    Messages:
    11,262
    Location:
    28078
    The only thing that I don't care for about it is the side focus (or rather lack thereof)...if and when they add one, I will very likely buy one too. :)
     
  24. Roadwild17

    Roadwild17 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2005
    Messages:
    1,143
    Location:
    Undisclosed
    yes, the side focus thing is just a PITA.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page