what the heck is a .44-.40?

It's interesting to note that the dot "." is not listed on SAAMIs cartridge drawings/names. There may be some names that it's listed, but none of the ones I've seen have it.

Wikipedia lists a dot for most cartridge names, incorrectly.

The 1890 Winchester big W cartridge board does not have the dots in the name listings.

In Clyde Williamsons book, The Winchester Lever Legacy, there are numerous chamber and cartridge drawings. The old Winchester drawings from circa 1912 do have the dot before the first number (.50-110). In the same book, the Omark cartridge and chamber drawings also list the dot for 44-40 (.44-40). There is not a Winchester 44-40 drawing in the book.

A keen eye will not the absence of the dot on BulletMatch's cartridges. We actually had a pretty long discussion about it when we were programming it, and I decided to not have a dot. I think that the dot is incorrect since it's not indicating a measurement, rather a caliber class.
 
Another question is why Winchester called the cartridge the “.44”WCF, when in reality it’s actually a .42.
It stems from the switch from healed bullets.
But to exasperate the confusion over nomenclature they decided to confuse things more by naming the 40 caliber cartridge 38 WCF.
 
I was just going to say, I admired someone’s courage to bring out a new “cutting edge” black powder bottleneck in the current market…🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
 
Maybe they thought it was British, where the parent cartridge comes first like the .450/.400. :rofl:

Pretty sure .427 rounds up to .43. Still has little to do with naming conventions. Funny, this is about .44’s 99% of the time, while no one boo hoos about the .38Spl, .327Fed or .250 Savage. Who cares???
 
There are Spanish and Belgian knockoffs marked .44 Winchester 73. Or just .44 1873.

Marlins were set up for a slightly heavier bullet, 218 grains, maybe.
 
If the OP is asking if that's a real Colt I believe the answer is yes. Somewhere in or around the 2007 -2011 time period Colt did a run of short-barreled, ejectorless, black powder frame Sherriff's and Storekeeper models. The caliber designation was on the left side of the barrel.
 
Did colt mark all their barrels like this??


pix922914748.jpg
I spent 30+ years in manufacturing, worked with several people more than capable of miss marking a batch of barrels.
For instance
Had one that messed up a part and they marked it "scrape" before putting it in the bin.

ETA I guarantee there was another person at Colt muttering under their breath something I can't say on THR.
 
Last edited:
Actually the 44-40 is the equivalent of the 44 Special, 45 Long Colt, 45 Schofield, a 200 grain bullet over 40 grains of black powder.
I read there was a gentleman's agreement between Colt and Winchester, Colt would not make long arms, Winchester would not make handguns.
 
Are we sure this is a ”real” Colt, not a foreign clone?

Kind of reminds me of the Chinese Norinco 1911 marked “Model of the 1911”
View attachment IMG_0120.webp

I just learned that the Spencer Rifle was among the last that used the case diameter at the rear, then the case diameter at the front, to designate caliber. Hence .56-.56 means a straight walled case, while the .56-.50 is a tapered case, and the .56-.42 was a bottlenecked case. But nobody did it like that afterward as far as I know.

Martini-Henry .577/450 Martini-Henry 1871-1918 (11.43×55R)
 
Last edited:
The offical name is 44-40 Winchester .
Colt didn't want to put Winchester on their revolvers ...
ergo ... the stamping , Colt SAA 44-40 ...
Just marketing and advertisment stuff ... don't overthink it !
Gary
 
Back
Top