Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

What would WA need to do to get an "F" from Brady Campaign?

Discussion in 'Legal' started by MatthewVanitas, Aug 12, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. MatthewVanitas

    MatthewVanitas Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    3,443
    Location:
    Washington DC (!)
    Greetings. Looking over the Brady Campaigns A-F grades for the various states, I was troubled to see that my homestate, Washington state, rated only a D+. What do we need to do to get an "F"?

    Is it the fact that we allow suppressors but not full-auto? Is our lack of open carry law keeping us up?

    Our Concealed Carry seems pretty darn good: no training requirement, takes $60 and 45 minutes (arrives in the mail in a couple weeks). Shall issue, even for non-residents (though they must apply in person). Oddly enough, we have a prohibition against carrying concealed at "outdoor music festivals", but I don't think that's the clincher.

    Check out the listing of graded states at the link below. Fascinating stuff. If someone has any clue what WA needs to push to get an F, it'd be great to hear it. Take care, -MV


    Chart of Brady Campaign "grade" by state
     
  2. Gray Peterson

    Gray Peterson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,548
    Location:
    Lynnwood, Washington
    I would say removing nearly all of the restrictions against carry would do it. Oregon has no prohibition against carrying in schools, but Washington State does.
     
  3. cosmos7

    cosmos7 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    97
    Location:
    PRK
    I would love to move to WA, and quite possibly will some day. Already have WA CCW... the one thing that could make it better would be if WA allowed Title II weapons... :cool:
     
  4. flatrock

    flatrock Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2004
    Messages:
    612
    Did you notice from their own chart shows that restrictive gun laws done have an effect of reducing violent crime.
     
  5. priv8ter

    priv8ter Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    1,003
    Location:
    Poulsbo, Wa
    Probably...

    If I had to hazard a guess, I would say that our restrictions against NFA weapons are what are keeping us from excelling.

    And, it's not just full auto's...we can't have Short barreled shotgun or Short barreled rifles either.

    And, if you read the rules on surpressors, you can have them, but not use them, as far as I understand.

    Then again, maybe all they are thinking about is Seattle. They would be hard pressed to give a group of Liberals like that an F.

    greg
     
  6. MatthewVanitas

    MatthewVanitas Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    3,443
    Location:
    Washington DC (!)
    Huh, wasn't aware that short-barreled longarms were verboten too.

    That's the trouble with a lot of these petty little laws: it's hard to see how they will ever change. I somehow don't see a state rep standing up and saying "let's pass a bill to let Washingtonians own sawed-off shotguns!" It just wouldn't play well in the press.

    Aside from a simple cleaning of the slate, firearms legislation-wise, I don't see how we can get back Title II, open carry, etc. Very little benefit to the politico who supports it, and a lot of bad press against it.
     
  7. Nazirite

    Nazirite Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Messages:
    349
    Location:
    From Tennessee to Ohio to Oklahoma
    I bet the states with the highest grade also have the highest murder rates. Wonder why that is, hummmmmmmm. :scrutiny:
     
  8. WYO

    WYO Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    777
    Why don't you just call them up and ask what it would take to get an F?
     
  9. c_yeager

    c_yeager Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2003
    Messages:
    5,479
    Location:
    Seattle
    It's our silly class III prohibition. Not to mention our own 5 day waiting period (if you dont have a CHP). I think thats about it really.

    As far as silencers go i thought you could buy/own but that you couldnt actually fit one to a firearm?
     
  10. SodiumBenzoate

    SodiumBenzoate Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2004
    Messages:
    697
    Location:
    Bucks Co., PA
    PA only has a D+, as well....

    It must be the law that requires guns to be sold with a lock, because PA's class 3 friendly, except for explosive destructive devices.

    I think it's hilarious how Maryland, which is top-rated, has the second highest violent crime rate and one of the higher firearms death rates.
     
  11. buy guns

    buy guns Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2004
    Messages:
    992
    Location:
    Florida
    damn we only got a d+ too. must be because open carry is illegal.
     
  12. Correia

    Correia Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    10,648
    Location:
    SLC
    My state is a D-. That sucks. I can't even think of what would cause that either? Same boat as Washington I guess.
     
  13. Dead

    Dead Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2003
    Messages:
    260
    It is interesting that it seems that states that have either F's or D's have lower violent crime, and murder rates.... Hmmmmmm I wonder.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page