Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

What's a good 9mm load to start with?

Discussion in 'Handloading and Reloading' started by possom813, Jan 2, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. possom813

    possom813 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2007
    Messages:
    789
    Location:
    An hour south of D/FW
    I'm pretty much ready to reload my first cartridge, baby steps, I know:what:

    It's going to be a bouncing baby 9mm.

    I've consulted the manuals-Abc's of Reloading/Reloaders Bible/Sierra Handbook.

    The manuals vary on a lot of specs, naturally.

    So I turn to you, much more experienced, higher educated, most awesomest folks on the board(enough brown-nosing there)

    The load I have worked up in my head is as follows,

    CCI Brass, Winchester Primer, 125gr cast rn bullet, 5.1 grains of HS-6

    Does that sound about right?

    Also, exactly how far is the bullet supposed to set down in the case on a cast bullet? I set a couple in empty cases to the best I could decipher from the manuals and they don't look right to me. The bullet has 3 grooves in it for the lube and it sets the top groove just about flush with the case.
     
  2. Racinbob

    Racinbob Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2008
    Messages:
    693
    Location:
    Central Florida
    Being new to reloading myself, I started light as well. I loaded 4.5 of W231 in my 9mm with Berrys 115 DS plated on my first try. It failed to cycle in my (now history) Kahr PM9. That told me nothing because that thing wouldn't function properly with anything. Then in my SR9 it seemed way too light and a few failed to cycle fully. The SR9 eats anything I feed it. I found that they were just too light. My friend had loaded 4.6 of Bullseye behind the same bullet and were noticeably hotter (by no means a hot load though). I now have some with 4.7 and 4.8 of W231 and some that match my buddies load. I'll be trying then either today or tomorrow and I'll report back.
     
  3. Galil5.56

    Galil5.56 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2007
    Messages:
    1,099
    I like HS-6 in 9mm very well, but only when loaded pretty near normal std pressures using jacketed bullets. The load you mention seems awfully light considering the propellant, and I believe will result in a lot of unburned powder, especially in colder weather, and nowhere near enough oomph to cycle a SA pistol. Might bump the start charge to 5.5, and probably going to need 5.8 or more to get any semblance of reliable functioning.

    For 125 grain lead bullets in 9mm I really like Unique, WW 231, and at times use Bullseye driving the bullets to 1050-1100 fps. As far as length, without knowing the bullet used it will be very hard to even come close to recommending a vague working length, and only your pistol can tell you what it needs for correct OAL by using the actual barrel as a gage.

    Good luck
     
  4. Walkalong

    Walkalong Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    48,451
    Location:
    Alabama
    HS-6 will be dirty at light loadings with lead. Use W-231 or 700X for that.
     
  5. shameless

    shameless Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Messages:
    69
    Location:
    Tx
    5.5gr W231 will function the SR9.
    Might type www.Hogden load data in your browser.
    Lots of load data there, as well as other places.

    Hang in there, and you will find that magic load
    for your gun.
     
  6. GaryL

    GaryL Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2006
    Messages:
    1,181
    Location:
    MN
    FWIW, I have found the 124-125gr bullets seem to work better in most 9mm guns I've tried. I've had great luck with HS-5, an obsolete powder I picked up for about $5/lb. When that is gone (next time I reload 9mm it will run out), I plan to work up a new load with HS-6, which some here have claimed is very similar.
     
  7. rfwobbly

    rfwobbly Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2008
    Messages:
    3,942
    Location:
    Cornelia, GA
    Too light ????

    I have no experience with HS-6 but according to the booklet in front of me, the load also seems too light. My first booklet says HS-6 starts at 6.4gr and maximum is 6.8gr.

    Furthermore, maximum 6.8gr for HS-6 is confirmed by the second reference, a free Hodgdon booklet available at any dealer or online. You'd usually start 10% below max, so that indicates a starting of ~6.1gr.

    HS-6 should deliver a nice, easy to handle, push to the hands once you get this round sorted out. I certainly hope it's a dense powder because getting 6gr of powder and a 124gr bullet into a 9x19 case is going to be a trick. Be sure and check for compressed loads. Be safe.

    Hope this helps.
     
  8. Redneck with a 40

    Redneck with a 40 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Messages:
    2,273
    Go with a basement load (minimum charge) of Unique, the stuff is safe (fills the case), and gives great performance across the board.:)
     
  9. possom813

    possom813 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2007
    Messages:
    789
    Location:
    An hour south of D/FW
    I don't want to change powders...I already have HS-6 and Green Dot, so that's out of the question, I still have several pounds left of these powders.

    One of those are going to have to work for the first load.

    But the bullets may be able to change, I just found a handful of 115gr fmj's in the drawer that I wasn't aware of.
     
  10. Galil5.56

    Galil5.56 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2007
    Messages:
    1,099
    Green Dot huh... I'd use it before HS-6 considering what you have written and want to do. Maybe a nice-n-easy, super soft 4 grains of GD to start, and max it around 4.5 or so. Nice bulky case filling powder that will be much cleaner, and I believe more consistent for what you are wanting to do over HS-6. FWIW, I load 115 jacketed bullets with 7 grains of HS-6 for a nice snappy load, that is low on the pressure spectrum... Maybe use the 115's you have with it?
     
  11. depoloni

    depoloni Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2008
    Messages:
    289
    Location:
    Michigan
    ProChrono Digital Chronograph
    CZ-75B 9mm Luger, 4.7" barrel

    POWDER - CHARGE WT. - VELOCITY @ 15'

    115 Grain Rainier Plated - 1.100" OAL HP // 1.125" OAL FMJ
    HS-6 5.8 983
    HS-6 6.1 1047
    HS-6 6.4 1102
    HS-6 6.6 1146
    HS-6 6.8 1162
    HS-6 7.0 1197

    122 Grain Cast Truncated Cone - 1.055" OAL
    HS-6 5.8 1069
    HS-6 6.1 1144
    HS-6 6.4 1207

    115 Grain Jacketed (Win/Rem/Magtech all ~ same) - 1.150" OAL
    HS-6 6.7 1076
    HS-6 7.0 1181



    ........that's what I have in my records that I worked up personally at least. I prefer W-231 (or HP-38, same thing) for cast loads in 9mm, or Unique for that matter although Unique is diiirty. In jacketed loads I stick with those two for simplicity's sake, although I LIKE the performance that HS-6 or Power Pistol offers on the "hot" end of the spectrum.

    Hope this helps.
     
  12. armoredman

    armoredman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2003
    Messages:
    16,723
    Location:
    proud to be in AZ
    With a 124gr cast, my best is 6.4gr of AA#7 or 4.2 gr of AA32, at 1.095 COAL, Lee FCD used. Works great in the CZ compact pistols I shoot.
     
  13. rfwobbly

    rfwobbly Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2008
    Messages:
    3,942
    Location:
    Cornelia, GA
    Green Dot then would be the better choice then based on bullet weight and powder speed. My book indicates GD is slightly faster than HS-6, so save your HS-6 for heavier bullets.

    For Green Dot it recommends starting at 4.7gr, with a max at 5.2gr for 125gr bullets. It infers an OAL of 1.169, but does not explicitly say.

    Better?
     
  14. rodregier

    rodregier Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,682
    Location:
    Halifax,NS Canada
    I've burned a lot of HS-6 in 9mmx19, works fine. Can't comment on Green Dot.
     
  15. Galil5.56

    Galil5.56 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2007
    Messages:
    1,099
    What book says GD is slightly faster? Any load data I have seen or used, burning rate chart, and actual experience tells me HS-6 is considerably slower.

    That 5.2 grain max for lead charge is also from the older Alliant/Herc manuals, and although I'm sure it's safe, in my experience they treat lead bullets way to similar to their jacketed brothers of the same weight, which in my experience and opinion is not always best. They also list an OAL of 1.150", which until we even remotely know the style of bullet used is useless. Even if safe, I'd love to see what 5.2 grains of GD/125 lead would chrono :what: and stand by my recommendation.
     
  16. rfwobbly

    rfwobbly Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2008
    Messages:
    3,942
    Location:
    Cornelia, GA
    Here's what I'm going by...
     

    Attached Files:

  17. bullseye308

    bullseye308 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2007
    Messages:
    1,553
    Location:
    Smyrna Tennessee
    The bullet is a Lee 90238 TL356-124-TC cast from ww's with ~4%tin air cooled. I load it to 1.08 with good success. No help on the powder, I use Bullseye.
     
  18. armoredman

    armoredman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2003
    Messages:
    16,723
    Location:
    proud to be in AZ
    That's the same mould I use, mine drops at .360, so I can size mine for both 38spl and 9mm. Great boolit.
     
  19. Galil5.56

    Galil5.56 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2007
    Messages:
    1,099
    This makes my point exactly, and why giving out an OAL w/o knowing the bullet is impossible, and damn hard even when known because of too many variables... So the Alliant data I cite uses this Lee TL124TC?

    I load that exact same bullet, seat it to 1.050"-1.070", and it works well in MY guns:

    IMG_7628.gif

    The Lee 125 RN to 1.115"

    IMG_8265.gif

    125 grain Lyman 356402's to 1.135", etc, etc....

    It's all about shank and nose length, barrel leade, and common sense. Oh yeah, just for comparison here is the 1.050" OAL of the TL124 TC and the generic Alliant recommended 1.150" OAL for the same bullet.

    [​IMG]

    My loooong leade 9mm barrels seat the one on the left just fine. They will seat the right one too... With a hammer. As I said, giving out universal OAL's is ridiculous.
     
    Last edited: Jun 2, 2011
  20. possom813

    possom813 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2007
    Messages:
    789
    Location:
    An hour south of D/FW
    Alright, I followed some advice here and there and everywhere and loaded my first two rounds with the 124gr tc cast bullet.

    Both with HS-6 powder, one with 5.9gr and one with 6.1gr

    As for oal, I don't know yet, but extremely close to the same length as a factory 147jhp and a similar profile.

    The are seated to the almost the exact spot Galil posted in the first pic.

    So off to see if they go bang tomorrow, we hope for bang because boom won't be any fun.

    FWIW, I checked these in the chamber of the test dummy and through the mag with some similar, non-live, rounds that were just brass and bullet to see if they cycle smooth. Only one caught up and I believe it was my fault for trying to cycle the firearm too fast.
     
  21. possom813

    possom813 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2007
    Messages:
    789
    Location:
    An hour south of D/FW
    Alright, I followed some advice here and there and everywhere and loaded my first two rounds with the 124gr tc cast bullet.

    Both with HS-6 powder, one with 5.9gr and one with 6.1gr

    As for oal, I don't know yet, but extremely close to the same length as a factory 147jhp and a similar profile.

    The are seated to the almost the exact spot Galil posted in the first pic.

    So off to see if they go bang tomorrow, we hope for bang because boom won't be any fun.

    FWIW, I checked these in the chamber of the test dummy and through the mag with some similar, non-live, rounds that were just brass and bullet to see if they cycle smooth. Only one caught up and I believe it was my fault for trying to cycle the firearm too fast.
     
  22. possom813

    possom813 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2007
    Messages:
    789
    Location:
    An hour south of D/FW
    Alright, I followed some advice here and there and everywhere and loaded my first two rounds with the 124gr tc cast bullet.

    Both with HS-6 powder, one with 5.9gr and one with 6.1gr

    As for oal, I don't know yet, but extremely close to the same length as a factory 147jhp and a similar profile.

    The are seated to the almost the exact spot Galil posted in the first pic.

    So off to see if they go bang tomorrow, we hope for bang because boom won't be any fun.

    FWIW, I checked these in the chamber of the test dummy and through the mag with some similar, non-live, rounds that were just brass and bullet to see if they cycle smooth. Only one caught up and I believe it was my fault for trying to cycle the firearm too fast.
     
  23. possom813

    possom813 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2007
    Messages:
    789
    Location:
    An hour south of D/FW
    Alright, I followed some advice here and there and everywhere and loaded my first two rounds with the 124gr tc cast bullet.

    Both with HS-6 powder, one with 5.9gr and one with 6.1gr

    As for oal, I don't know yet, but extremely close to the same length as a factory 147jhp and a similar profile.

    The are seated to the almost the exact spot Galil posted in the first pic.

    So off to see if they go bang tomorrow, we hope for bang because boom won't be any fun.

    FWIW, I checked these in the chamber of the test dummy and through the mag with some similar, non-live, rounds that were just brass and bullet to see if they cycle smooth. Only one caught up and I believe it was my fault for trying to cycle the firearm too fast.
     
  24. possom813

    possom813 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2007
    Messages:
    789
    Location:
    An hour south of D/FW
    Alright, I followed some advice here and there and everywhere and loaded my first two rounds with the 124gr tc cast bullet.

    Both with HS-6 powder, one with 5.9gr and one with 6.1gr

    As for oal, I don't know yet, but extremely close to the same length as a factory 147jhp and a similar profile.

    The are seated to the almost the exact spot Galil posted in the first pic.

    So off to see if they go bang tomorrow, we hope for bang because boom won't be any fun.

    FWIW, I checked these in the chamber of the test dummy and through the mag with some similar, non-live, rounds that were just brass and bullet to see if they cycle smooth. Only one caught up and I believe it was my fault for trying to cycle the firearm too fast.
     
  25. Blind Bat

    Blind Bat Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2008
    Messages:
    264
    DANGER WILL ROBINSON... Unless you are shooting a 100gr bullet, 5.5gr is WAY over max for W231. Even 4.5gr would be getting close to the max velocity that lead bullets will handle. You probably meant to say HS6 but since W231 is such a popular powder I would be remiss not to say something in case some came across this thread in a a search for W231 9mm loads...

    According to Hodgdon's web site 3.9-4.4gr of W231 @ 1.125 is the correct load for 125gr LCN.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page