If you can read Greek and Hebrew, that can't really be disputed, eh? But as to the interpretation of the translated text, well...
I think you missed my point somewhat.
Just for example, let us assume that most fundamentalists (meant here as people who interpret the Bible literally) use the King James text.
Just for example, Luke 14:26 is translated completely incorrectly in the KJV. KJV has the unfortunate translation of the Greek word
miseo, as "hate", when it should be rendered "love less by comparison." Obviously, Christ does not want people to hate their parents and family!
It's just like computers: Garbage In = Garbage Out. If someone's opinion is based on incorrect information (or less charitably, ignorance), then it is at best problematic.
In other words, my interpretation of the text, which is presumably based on a correct translation, is then "better" than an interpretation based on an incorrect translation. While we might argue that translation is itself a matter of interpretation, which is a valid point, there is no question that the KJV has Luke 14:26 wrong.
Another example: A class is assigned a book report on
The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe. Gallant reads the book and writes his report. Goofus reads the Cliff Notes to
Out of the Silent Planet and writes his report. Who will get the higher grade, assuming equal analytical and writing skills, etc.?
Again, I'm not claiming a monopoly on wisdom. I do agree this was a rotten example to communicate my point. It's too controversial for most Americans.
