Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

When the ban happens what will you do?

Discussion in 'Legal' started by Snarlingiron, Jun 10, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Snarlingiron

    Snarlingiron Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,362
    Location:
    Fort Worth, Texas (Where men are men, and a lot of
    I was prompted to get my CHL, and get my weapons cache updated, and my training updated by the events of Katrina. Fact is we are all just a big wind or earthquake away from anarchy. With that said, and with the current political climate, I fear it is entirely possible, that we will see a British or Austrialilan style weapons ban in the not too distant future. Should that happen what will you do???

    Will you go gentle into that good night, or will you be in the "When they pry my cold dead fingers off the barrel" camp?
     
  2. Molon Labe

    Molon Labe Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2003
    Messages:
    1,700
    Location:
    SW Ohio
    Nothing.

    In other words, I will carry out my business as I always have. Any "gun ban" would have no meaning to me. I will continue to shoot my guns as if a ban never happened.

    And when someone interferes with my inalienable right to bear arms, rest assured they will soon meet their maker...
     
  3. xd9fan

    xd9fan Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    1,858
    Location:
    Under tyranny in Midwest
    +1......the simple God's truth......
     
  4. ctdonath

    ctdonath Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2003
    Messages:
    3,618
    Location:
    Cumming GA
    What ban? Natural rights, esp. as recognized in the BoR, trump lesser laws.
     
  5. CAnnoneer

    CAnnoneer Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    1,838
    Location:
    Los Angeles County, CA
    If the gov cannot collect 20 million aliens, how would they be able to collect 150 million guns? Mr Commie President, "unenforcibility" works both ways...
     
  6. The-Fly

    The-Fly Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2005
    Messages:
    897
    Location:
    Northern Colorado
    the gun grabbers are welcome to my toys, once I've run out of bullets, or i've melted the barrels down while exterminating fascists /socialists who are trying to remove the forementioned toys from my hands.
     
  7. progunner1957

    progunner1957 member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2004
    Messages:
    831
    Location:
    A wolf living in Sheeple land
    Better stay away from Copperhead Road

    :D:evil: :D :evil: :D :evil:
     
  8. Art Eatman

    Art Eatman Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    43,280
    Location:
    Terlingua, TX; Thomasville,GA
    Sorry, but I just really don't see any liklihood of a "ban". The usual suspects will continue their nonsense, but as long as the US House of Representatives maintains anything like its present makeup, with its Republican majority, it can't happen.

    State level laws? Generally going our way, given the improvements in CHL. And the publicity following the Katrina fiasco has a lot of state legislators running scared of our voting strength.

    Our real danger comes from our own apathy as regards activism in the political arena...

    Art
     
  9. ProficientRifleman

    ProficientRifleman Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2006
    Messages:
    579
    Do? What to do?

    I'll be a "good citizen" !!!:neener: :evil: :)
     
  10. Soybomb

    Soybomb Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2005
    Messages:
    3,959
    I've said it before and I'll say it again, there will be no "gun confiscation day" its a war of attrition. First theres no importing of foreign built non-sporting rifles, no new class 3 guns, and tight control of the ones that exist and suppressors. Then its an assault weapons ban, then you roll .50bmg into it. Then you start registering all guns, then you quit registering handguns like chicago has done. It takes a few decades but eventually the supply will have disappeared and whats left will have a high price and be tightly controlled, except for your single shot sporting weapons of course. Gun owners for the most part won't care because half just want to hunt only, most of the rest won't get too upset if they can keep what they have. Even the gun ownership lobbies will accept your "sensible gun control" and not try to regain full auto weapons. Where were the machismo filled events that so many love to detail when they'll scream molon labe and hand over their guns (ammo first) for the federal AWB, class 3 laws, state awb's, chicago bans, illinois registration of gun owners, etc.

    In short I think gun owners blow alot of smoke alot of the time. :evil:
     
  11. beerslurpy

    beerslurpy member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    4,438
    Location:
    Spring Hill, Florida
    No ban on the way. Stop stirring up trouble.

    No, I have not been replaced by a pod.

    Rather than encouraging molon labe type talk over unlikely scenarios, your energies would be better spent helping to push the tide towards more stand your ground and more shall-issue ccw type laws. These are movements that are succeeding and would be succeeding faster if more people evangelized or at least pitched in. Laws like that force people to accept and eventually feel comfortable with the concept of RKBA as a fundamental right and a normal, socially acceptable activity.

    The end result of such activism is that more people feel threatened by bans and we also get to free-ride upon the infrastructure they support (ranges, ammo and gun manufacturers, competitions, good laws). Contrast that to the end result of molon labe type "I will kill everyone" rambo talk. While internet ramblings are unlikely to get you arrested by the FBI, it is also unlikely to bring RKBA into the mainstream.

    And again, no I havent been replaced by a pod.
     
  12. progunner1957

    progunner1957 member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2004
    Messages:
    831
    Location:
    A wolf living in Sheeple land
    But what happens this November after The Sheeple rout the Republican majority and turn both the Senate and the House over to leftist/Democrat/socialist control?

    What happens in 2008 when a leftist/Democrat/socialist wins/steals the White House and inherits a leftist/Democrat/socialist controlled Congress?

    Something to think about.
     
  13. beerslurpy

    beerslurpy member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    4,438
    Location:
    Spring Hill, Florida
    The sheeple dont care about bush when they pull the local lever. As long as their rep takes the right stance on their issues, they wont vote them out and they wont raise the hammer and sickle. The one whose job is most endangered by Bush's low approval ratings is Bush, and he isnt running again.

    The Republicans are self destructing, but the Dems cant occupy the vaccuum because they arent equipped to win the conservative vote. If the people that give the Repubs low ratings in the phone polls still vote for them in the elections, the Republicans arent going to lose power. The sad thing is that this is worse for conservatives than it is for republicans since they can piss on us with impunity. Well, not total impunity- there are always primaries and the Dems could go back to allowing in conservatives like they did in the old Solid South days. But I dont see that happening this year.
     
  14. Nightfall

    Nightfall Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2003
    Messages:
    1,817
    Location:
    WA
    Doesn't Snarlingiron get a trophy or something for being the 1,000th poster to make a thread about this? :D

    Maybe we should just permanently sticky this thread or one of the thousand others so we don't have to keep rehashing the "gun owner armageddon" stuff ad nauseum.
     
  15. xd9fan

    xd9fan Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    1,858
    Location:
    Under tyranny in Midwest
    LOL God theres some great truth to that..............I hope:uhoh:
     
  16. Oldtimer

    Oldtimer Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    Messages:
    370
    There isn't much of a chance that there will ever be a total ban on guns in the USA....BUT we may see outlandish increases of the taxes on firearms and ammunition!

    There have already been legislative "tries" to impose a 5-cents, and even a 10-cents tax, imposed on ammunition....and those were PER ROUND, not per box! That would kick up the price of .22LR ammo to about $5, or $10 for a box of 50 rounds! Kind of expensive "plinking"!

    The late U.S. Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D-NY) authored legislative papers that called for a 10,000% increase of the federal tax on ammo. Moynihan never submitted that legislation, but it was supposedly handed over to a certain Senator Hillary Rodham-Clinton, who has claimed that she might submit it "....when the timing is right"!

    They (the anti-gun folks) have "wormed" their way into almost all facets of life, and a lot of sheeple are going along with the ideas of adding taxes on guns and ammo, since they "cause" so much violence, plus the costs involved with the medical treatment of shooting victims.

    It's "okay" for the emergency rooms of hospitals to be used as "HMO's" for illegal aliens....for FREE, but.....increase the taxes on the evil guns and ammo to pay for the emergency rooms that are currently going broke!
     
  17. Snarlingiron

    Snarlingiron Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,362
    Location:
    Fort Worth, Texas (Where men are men, and a lot of
    This is pretty much what prompted me to make the post. I think a lot of people aren't taking Hillary nearly seriously enough.

    Sorry, new member, and I am a "jump right in and stir the pot" kind of guy". I wasn't aware that it was a shopworn topic, although I guess I should have been now that I think about it. I'll search first next time.

    Guess I kind of touched a nerve, and that was my intent. Sitting back and telling ourselves that it "can never happen here" pretty much insures that it will.
     
  18. atlctyslkr

    atlctyslkr Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2006
    Messages:
    477
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    Prohibition didn't work so why would a gun ban. Liquor is easy to make compared to guns but ammo isn't that hard. A gun ban would just spawn a whole new crop of crime.

    I belive it's something that will happen over time. A national handgun ban I could see. I've met alot of people against handguns but that have no problem with sporting rifles and shotguns. On a basic level there is not much difference in eating a farm grown chicken and a duck that was hunted.
     
  19. Sergeant Bob

    Sergeant Bob Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    1,505
    Location:
    The Swamps of Goldwater, MI
    Oh goody! Another chance for a bunch of self styled rebels and keyboard commandos to bluster bravely "From my cold, dead hands!", "Molon Labe!", and "I'll give up my guns barrel first, one bullet at a time!".

    Weeeeeeee! What fun! :barf:
     
  20. Deanimator

    Deanimator Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Messages:
    10,700
    Location:
    Rocky River, Ohio
    There isn't going to be a ban.

    There might be a very bloody guerrilla war, instead though.
     
  21. doc tc

    doc tc Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    Messages:
    31
    it is not about "them" taking away anything, be it guns or booze or what ever. there is no "them", there is only "us". we would do well to think clearly about our obligations to the protection, through our political process, of the freedoms bequeathed to us by previous generations and to put away the fear that tends to knot up our otherwise reliable minds.

    "cold dead fingers"? well, that statement may express our ultimate belief but it does nothing to persuade others to adopt a more enlightened view of gun ownership. great rhetoric, poor tactic. not particularly helpful, politically speaking for any number of obvious reasons.

    shouting at your listener will not move him to your position. showing fear will not improve your credibility.

    just the facts, ma'am.

    britain and australia and any number of other countries which have limited or even banned firearms altogether offer examples of failed political "solutions" to the "gun problem". let's use these results to support our defense of our rights.

    we do all know that the price of our rights is eternal vigilance, yes? and though rights might well be won at the end of a barrel, they are secured through political consensus?

    so take a kid duck hunting. support competitive marksmanship. do something positive.

    and another thing. all this SHTF talk. you know, this kind of talk is just so much crap. "what you're gonna' do when they come for you"? give me a break. tough guy rhetoric is not helpful to the cause.

    guns don't make girly men more than they are.

    flame on,

    doc
     
  22. gopguy

    gopguy Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Messages:
    1,189
    Location:
    S.W. Ohio
    They would be ill advised to ever go for a national gun ban. There would be huge noncompliance. And rightly so.

    The Romans used to say "Lex Mala Lex Nulla". A bad law is null and void, or in other words to be ignored. I keep hearing liberals, for example the late Molly Yard screaming that if congress banned abortion there would be lawlessness in the streets. I well remember Democratic politicians praising her for saying that... However I can just imagine those same folks saying if we won't comply with a gun ban we are dangerous criminals.....:rolleyes:

    The most brutal mass murder in the US after all was when Bill Clinton,Janet Reno and the FBI/BATF gassed and burned over 90 American men women and children in the attempt to enforce a gun control law........and they never did prove the Davidians had any illegal full auto weapons......Just because they were weird is not an excuse to barbeque them.......:fire:

    I see no need to comply with a illegal and unconstituional law passed by a bunch of tyrants. If they try this I think they may well start the Second American war for independence.....as the country and government founded by my ancestors will have ceased to exist. Radical you might say....no more so than Thomas Jefferson and his comment that "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
     
  23. gopguy

    gopguy Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Messages:
    1,189
    Location:
    S.W. Ohio

    Hmm so what will the Sergent Bob's do?

    Folks it is a serious question. If the Democrats do get back into power in Congress and grab the White House they may indeed want to retaliate against the folks they blame for thier losing control of Congress in 1994. The American gun owner and the NRA. Clinton himself and the Washington Post credited us with tossing out the Dems.....Bob may think it keyboard warrior rubbish. But I think it needs to be made clear to the Joe Biden, Chucky Schumer, Carolyn McCarthy's etc..... out there that they will be asking for a revolt if they ever try such a thing.....
     
  24. TooTaxed

    TooTaxed Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    1,255
    Location:
    Columbus, Georgia
    Sorry folks...but gun bans are entirely possible after the next elections.

    Our major political parties have become polarized regarding the issue of gun ownership...Republicans for, Democrats against. Major Democratic party leaders...Clinton, Feinstein, Boxer, Moynahan, Kennedy, Kerry, and MANY others...have come out strongly for draconian gun control. (Remember the Assault Weapons Ban?) I can't think of one nationally ranked Democratic leader who espouses gun owenership! And the Republican Party is in a popularity downswing.

    A Democratic leadership can accomplish legal disarmament by one..or both...of two methods. Pass laws in Congress, or acquiess with the United Nations people disarmament program. Once the bans are passed, it becomes very difficult to reverse them, even after another change of government.

    It is absolutely essential that we be VERY politically active during the next elections.:uhoh:
     
  25. gm

    gm Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    328
    Location:
    ohio
    it wont be everything,all at once.it will be incremental as it has been and on a state by state basis.it will be applied under the guise of being sensable or part of some other bill that the mainstream sheeple want...the ol compromise.
    ya know sneaky things that the antis pull at the last minute and the bill gets passed while everyone is standing about or not present, then itll go to the antigun president who will happily pass it.


    thats the way it has been done,it got us the permanent bans from earlyin the 1930s,later,the new machinegun ban of 1986,the importban of 89, later..the semi-permanent 10 year ban on features.if you look at states,just take a look at california and some of the other lone states that have similiar laws and passing stricter ones... enter a gun grabbing new orleans dictator wannabe during an emergency... the ruby ridge fiasco,its all there.

    my point being it can happen but not all at once and that there are people that have the backing and political muscle if you will, to push such things.We have to let them all know its unacceptable and expose them for what they are.Voting is one way to do so,demonstrations are another,as are voicing your opinion to every senator.


    to answer it,by all peaceful means available.if it came down to confiscation at my doorstep,they would certainly have to take them from me because I would not give them up.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page