Where do Anti's come from?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Halo said:
People tend to have disdain for other people who do not share their same inadequacies, fears, prejudices, etc. Rather than view it as admirable, they lash out at those other people because subconsciously they don't like seeing the contrast to their own weaknesses.

And if we speak in the vast generality of labeling ourselves as "gun owners," it is important to realize we do the same thing.

Before you flame, let me ask you if you've ever met a real-deal survivalist?

Ever meet a guy who believes Mel Tappan's books are The Holy Grail? Ever hear about a place in Wisconsin renamed "Tigerton Dells" where the Posse Comitatus took over the local government? Ever hear about the urban legends of Aryan Nations building communities in the geographical area of Sandpoint, Idaho?

Well, I have, and I feel ashamed to find these people in our big tent. But they exist.

Our nuts are simply a polar version of their nuts.
 
OCHMUDE said:
I know a lot of anti's (I'm from Massachusetts) and can tell you from personal experience that a lot of them, actually all of the anti's that I'm personally acquainted with, are wonderful people with the most sincere and upright of intentions. I've heard the saying that anti's want to feel safe and pro's want to be safe. IMHO, that's just pro-gun rhetoric. Everyone want's to actually be safe.
The real problem is much more deep-seeded than that. The state of American culture is on that is devoid of a sense of personal responsibility. The majority of the U.S. population wants to be legislated through life. They want laws telling them what to do and what not to do. They feel it's the government's job to care for them like a parent cares for a child. Heck, this is true on even on a very small scale. At the company I work for (manufacturing of engine parts) I have seen employees go to the HR manager because someone was "hogging the microwave in the breakroom". People don't want to work things out for themselves, take care of themselves, or fend for themselves. They want to pass that responsibility to someone who's "in charge".
That's one of the things that irritated me about my time in the Marines (which was an overall positive experience which I'm very proud of. I'm not now nor would I ever bash the Corps). When I was nearing my time to decide to re-up or get out, a lot of other guys were facing the same decision at the same time. A few of them made the decision to stay in solely because "it's so easy, you just do what you're told, and you get paid for it." They were brought up in that culture of the nanny-state, the society were you just follow the rules like a good boy and those who know better will take care of you.
This brings me to the largest, and truly the saddest difference between anti's and pro's. For anti's, all this makes sense. They think it is good and right, it's what's best for them, for their families, for society. They have lost all touch with the meaning behind a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. Beyond that, they really don't feel capable of trusting themselves or taking care of themselves. When anti's say you shouldn't have a gun, what they are saying is they don't trust themselves to have guns, and since you couldn't possibly be better than them, you aren't to be trusted either. Leave all that to the people in charge. That's their job, not ours. That's what we pay them for.
Until anti's start to realize that they aren't helpless and are able to care for themselves without the assisitance of legislation, and until they are able to think for themselves without the guidance of the media, they will remain anti. But once they taste the freedom and sense of empowerment that comes with accepting personal responsibility, they will slowly join our side. God know's when, or if that day will ever come.

BINGO!
 
Fred40, I believe most of that, except for a section of America I just learned about on cable. It's called the "Garbage Designer" or a similar title.

He moved to Taos, Arizona during the art movement. But he's far from being just another lazy, unemployed slacker. His wife commented that she can always tell when ideas pop into his head. It's the continued wave of guys designing geo-homes decades before.

He's building these houses, and not just the fancy-schmancy suburban yuppie version of "green." He reports that he is not connected to sewage or the power grid, and yet his homes support a family of four--some food grown in the atrium of the house.

In just about every way I can think of, he's freer than I am.

He's taken the freedoms everyone has here in this country and actually applied them--not just talk about it.

If I had to choose, I'd rather pick this nut than some weekend hunter with a Weatherby and a copy of Shooting Times.
 
A) People who have lost a family member or close friend that has been killed/maimed/wounded by the misuse of a firearm.

Yep, and look at the damage one of those can do - Sarah Brady. :fire:

She and her ilk are consumed by a knee jerk reaction to a very traumatic event and can't get past it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top