Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Which .38 bullet type?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by bg226, Jun 17, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. bg226

    bg226 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2006
    Messages:
    503
    I need to feed a .38 snubby. I want to use standard pressure .38 SPL with a solid non-expanding bullet. I'm not sure if SWC, LRN, or FMJ is best. What i'm most concerned about is bullets deforming, breaking apart and losing weight when shot into various mediums. I've seen LRN bullets badly deformed and shaved when recovered from flesh and bone, perhaps FMJ would not do that because of the jacket keeping the bullet together?

    Any help?

    ** Factory ammunition only.**
     
  2. _N4Z_

    _N4Z_ Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Messages:
    1,018
    Location:
    Michigander lost in... The Yonders, Oklahoma
    short answer

    I think FMJ is your best bet to suffer the least from deformation in a standard pressure .38 special round. Any of the the usual suspects (Fed, Rem, Win, etc) should fit the bill.
     
  3. MCgunner

    MCgunner Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    25,316
    Location:
    The end of the road between Sodom and Gomorrah Tex
    FMJ should deform the least and be the least effective stopper of the options. Don't quite understand the requirement, but I find lots of FMJ in the back stop at the range that look like they could be reloaded and fired again.
     
  4. Jim Watson

    Jim Watson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    22,844
    I don't understand your requirements, I WANT a bullet to be deformed in flesh and bone, which is why I use hollowpoints.
    But if you just must, you need a FMJ or a handload with really hard cast bullet. The low velocity plated junk they sell at Cheapmart is not good for much, but Fiocchi makes a 158 gr FMC as well as a couple of lighter bullet loads.
     
  5. JLaw

    JLaw Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    143
    Location:
    Woodlands, TX
    I'm not a ballistics expert, but what about a LSCW?? I'd like to think it's a descent bullet for non +P applications in .38 Spl. I've heard tales of LRN ammo beeing a poor manstopper in .38 Spl (but I've had no experience in this, and have not done any formal research). The LSWC may deform slightly, but it would be my choice for a .38 Spl non +P defense load, for what it's worth.

    Again, I'm no expert, so I'm looking forward to more discussion on this matter.

    JLaw
     
  6. SeanSw

    SeanSw Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    947
    Location:
    Central IL
    I doubt there is much effective difference between a hard cast LRN bullet and a FMJ. The standard pressure (or should I say low pressure at 750FPS) 125 and 158gr LRN bullets don't deform at all when fired into a block of pressure treated lumber, and very slightly deform when bouncing off of an old shovel. I have had the standard Remington UMC 130gr fmj bullets flatten out when shooting at an old computer hard drive, if that says anything....

    If you change your mind about standard pressure ammunition, the Speer Lawman 158gr TMJ (total metal jacket) was reccomended in another thread for use in deep penetrating/non expanding situations.
     
  7. Jkwas

    Jkwas Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2006
    Messages:
    600
    Location:
    Boca Raton Fl. "The Gunshine State"
    I think I understand your requirement. You want something that will penetrate to the vitals and hold together while doing it. Not a bad idea in a snub. Georgia arms makes some plated SWC ammo which might fit your bill, or S&B makes a 158gn standard pressure FMJ which is also a Flat Point that would tend to crush tissue instead of slipping thru it. They make a jacketed soft point in the same configuration as well. Magtech makes some jacketed flat points as well in several different weights. As far as Lead Round Nose goes, I work with a retired cop who has several registered kills with LRN. So I guess it does work.
    Personally I would stick with a LSWC or flat point for penetration. With standard pressures my concern is that if a bullet does expand, it won't go deep enough.
    Hornady makes a 158gn XTP round in standard pressure, and I understand that they don't expand that much, but penetrate better than other JHP's at the lower speeds.
     
  8. Brian Williams

    Brian Williams Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    9,869
    Location:
    Kampong Cham, Cambodia
    Standard velocity LSWC in 38 spec will do the trick.
     
  9. MCgunner

    MCgunner Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    25,316
    Location:
    The end of the road between Sodom and Gomorrah Tex
    The SWCs I find in the dirt at the range tend to be deformed or somewhat flattened at the point. That probably wouldn't happen in tissue, of course. Dirt is tougher than tissue. But, the FMJ stuff, like I say, often looks as if you could reload and fire it again even in dirt! Just on your criteria, not trying to read anything into it, FMJ.

    That said, I carry +P hollow points in my snubby and ain't changin' that! The FBI load is hard to beat even in a snubby for effectiveness in this caliber. It's penetration is PLENTY and it deforms/expands to do more tissue damage. I see no reason to start shooting any round nose standard pressure loads. If I could get .357 ballistics out of a snubby without all the flash/bang/recoil, I'd go .357. But, .38s work better in snubs IMHO.
     
  10. FotoTomas

    FotoTomas Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2003
    Messages:
    110
    Location:
    Orlando and Daytona Beach, Florida
    I understand what you want but not "why" you want it! :)

    I have a S&W Model 38 Bodyguard with the two inch barrel. It is an older model from around 1959 and NOT +P rated. I carried it in the pocket for years with a limited supply or Federal 125 Grain HP "NYCLAD" bullets. They expanded well in test media and were the top choice for snubbies with pressure limitations.

    As for now I keep it loaded with standard velocity 158 grain lead SWC bullets. It is a verry accurate load AND the sights are regulated for it. The rounds I have recovered showed little deformation and no weight loss. If I were to pack this gun for defense or trail use this is the round I would carry.
     
  11. Jkwas

    Jkwas Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2006
    Messages:
    600
    Location:
    Boca Raton Fl. "The Gunshine State"
    Just got a box of the S&B 158gn 38spl soft point in standard pressure. Haven't shot em yet, but they look good. The soft point is flat with sharp edges, approximating a swc, but it's jacketed! If it shoots like the FMJ, it may be a winner. Might be heavy for my small frame, but perfect for my old model 10. They list it pretty hot, but if you read the fine print, they use a 7.5in barrel, so who knows. I don't have a chrono. so I really won't be able
    to tell for sure. Anybody know?
     
  12. wixedmords

    wixedmords Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    43
    Location:
    Lakes Region of NH
    The least amount of bullet deformity when hitting the body?

    I would say the FMJ, then LRN then SWC.

    Of course this depends on where it hits the body.

    I understand you are just completing a thought.

    Sounds like you are trying a new approach to something. Good luck. :)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page