Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Which Battle Rifle in Theory Has a Longer Service Life?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Texasred, Nov 8, 2008.

?

Which would last longer?

  1. AR-10/SR-25

    2 vote(s)
    2.4%
  2. M1A/M-14

    20 vote(s)
    23.5%
  3. FAL

    13 vote(s)
    15.3%
  4. G3/CETME

    2 vote(s)
    2.4%
  5. Saiga .308

    6 vote(s)
    7.1%
  6. Bolt action (insert name here)

    37 vote(s)
    43.5%
  7. Other?(specify)

    5 vote(s)
    5.9%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Texasred

    Texasred Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2006
    Messages:
    497
    Location:
    Houston, Tx
    Which of the given .308 Rifles, given spare parts and replacing BBLs, would theoretically last the longest?
    When I mean theoreutically, I mean how the impact of firing is transmitted to the frame/receiver, parts materials, designs, and durability?

    Please no unnecessary criticisms, and I'm not considering ammuntion costs, so don't go shoot back that it would take millions of dollars of ammo to wear so and so out.

    As for my choice, it seems the AR-10, or the FAL in second. What do the more experienced think?

    1. AR-10
    2. M1A/M14
    3. G3/CETME
    4. FAL
    5. Saiga .308
    6. Other
     
  2. Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow

    Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2007
    Messages:
    13,146
    I don't know if the best, but I'd venture to guess than an FAL built on a "type 1" receiver without lightening cuts would last forever and a day.
     
  3. Auburn1992

    Auburn1992 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    Messages:
    1,015
    Location:
    Tennessee
    Why didn't you put the AK up there?
     
  4. General Geoff

    General Geoff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    5,060
    Location:
    Allentown, Pennsylvania
    If receiver longevity is what you're looking for, I would have to give it to the M14/M1A platform. This is assuming equal rate of fire and optimal ammunition for the specified gas system.


    Auburn, the Saiga .308 is the AK platform in this contest. He didn't include an AK-47 because that's not .308.
     
  5. Browning

    Browning Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Messages:
    1,431
    Location:
    DFW - TX
    I would think something like a Mauser or an Enfield would beat them all since you also have bolt action rifles up there. It's a manual repeater and there's less parts to break as a result. With some of the semi-auto rifles up there one spring goes bad or a pin breaks and that's all she wrote.

    Think of how long the Enfield was in service with the British (1888 to the early 1960's) and the Mauser was with the Germans (1871 to 1945). Plus I've heard of people fixing their bolt action surplus rifles with pieces of scrap steel, try that with some of the more finicky semi-autos up there.
     
  6. General Geoff

    General Geoff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    5,060
    Location:
    Allentown, Pennsylvania
    With the addition of bolt actions, I will say without a doubt that just about any bolt action receiver will last forever, especially if the person doing the shooting is slowly and carefully cycling the bolt.
     
  7. woodybrighton

    woodybrighton member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Messages:
    791
    Location:
    BRIGHTON
    2nd an enfield almost unbreakable and few parts to break any self loader is going to be more likely to break more things to go wrong and more rounds fired.
    Canandian rangers still use them as still likely to go bang and persuade mr polar bear to go away or drop dead at -I can't believe it gets this cold:evil:
     
  8. Texasred

    Texasred Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2006
    Messages:
    497
    Location:
    Houston, Tx
    Okay I shouldnt have put the bolt actions on there.
    Lets focus on the autoloaders now!
     
  9. MTMilitiaman

    MTMilitiaman Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2005
    Messages:
    2,458
    Location:
    Missoula, Montana
    The last number I heard floating around for the operational service life of a military M14 receiver was 400,000 rounds.

    Now I don't know how many FALs or G3s are shooting nearly half a million rounds through the same receiver, but I know that by that point, the war's over, and the cockroaches won.

    So of the semi-auto battle rifles, I think the M14 is the winner, possibly by a decisive margin.

    It is possible that a bolt action rifle could beat it, but part of me wonders if the service life of a bolt action is actually as superior as some claim it to be. Once we start talking about actual round count, I think things might be a little more even than could be believed.
     
  10. Texasred

    Texasred Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2006
    Messages:
    497
    Location:
    Houston, Tx
    I know what you mean Militiaman, about bolt actions. Funny comment about the M-14 by the way.

    But it seems that the action of the autoloaders would dampen the stress to the receiver by some margin at least. The bolt actions simply take the impact on an almost equal amount of steel and would seem to stretch given hundreds of thousands of rounds.
     
  11. 1 old 0311

    1 old 0311 member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2005
    Messages:
    2,672
    Location:
    Planet Earth
    AK's. Look at those used in Third World countries. They were used by Russia, and China till they were beat to death, then sent to Africa, Asia, and South America where they are still going strong.
     
  12. HorseSoldier

    HorseSoldier Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2006
    Messages:
    5,297
    Location:
    Anchorage, AK
    As soon as the question goes from only considering mil-spec rifles to being mil-spec+clones the whole question gets more complicated.

    A Springfield M1A is not built to USGI M14 specs. Nor are most ARs, most FAL clones, etc. For the actual mil-spec weapons, their longevity is kind of a moot point (as MTMilitiaman pointed out). For some of the clones, however, you could be looking at a fraction of the hundred of thousands of rounds military rifle designs would be rated for.
     
  13. FMJMIKE

    FMJMIKE Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2007
    Messages:
    1,577
    Location:
    Copper Hill, Virginia
    AK-47 type rifles will last longer..........IMHO
     
  14. stubbicatt

    stubbicatt Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2007
    Messages:
    3,413
    Location:
    Colorado
    Perhaps it is a different design concept with the M14 series. Just like cars of the 40s and 50s, the wearing parts are made to readily serviced and replaced. The durable parts are extremely durable. The M14 receiver should last a very long time.

    I know I prefer my G3 clone to an M14, but while the G3 will last a very long time, I don't think that it was designed or built with the thought in mind of rebarreling the receiver when the barrel is shot out. Seems one of those shoot it until it wears out, then salvage the trigger pack and bolt carrier for the next rifle, but toss the barrel/receiver/trunnion assembly away type rifles.
     
  15. jaholder1971

    jaholder1971 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,302
    Location:
    thehighroad.us
    I gotta go with about any bolt gun, simply becasue of the lack of moving parts and fewer springs to break.
     
  16. alemonkey

    alemonkey Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2007
    Messages:
    1,678
    Location:
    Lincoln, NE
    There were lee enfields from before WW1 still in service long after WW2, IIRC.
     
  17. Texasred

    Texasred Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2006
    Messages:
    497
    Location:
    Houston, Tx
    I know once again that the rifles on here will last longer than me in most cases if I lived to be 200 years old.

    But this has been a concern of mine seeing as if they were to make a BAN and registration like they have done in CALIFORNIA, then all those people over there are left with the guns they have legal rights too. Correct?

    Now these gun for all intensive purposes (if they never lift the ban) will literally end up shot to the point of complete failure. Right? They can still smith their guns and order parts for them.

    The guns legal status makes them worth the constant repair and may as well stretch these guns as thin as possible. I imagine in 30 or 40 years from now we may hear about some receiver failures. In this case, the state won't let the citizen buy a replacement lower for their AR or replacement flat for their AK right?

    This is why they even have Magazine overhaul kits for sale. Where as us over in the free states take for granted that we can buy 10 or so of our favorites for less than 150$. To our free minds it is never a concern if an insignificant $10 magazine's springs wear out, we just toss it right? Boy are we spoiled compared to our fellow Americans over in the commie states!

    It seems that this question has a real purpose given the circumstances. Or am I just being ridiculous now?
     
  18. The Bushmaster

    The Bushmaster Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2005
    Messages:
    7,837
    Location:
    Ava, Missouri
    M1 Garand...
     
  19. Blacksmoke

    Blacksmoke Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2008
    Messages:
    646
    Location:
    North central New Mexico
    I am curious why the Garand is not on your list. That has my vote for semi auto. Hard to say which would last longer in the bolt actions. SMLE are pretty damn fine rifles. We would be considering both SMLEs and Garands converted to .308, I guess.
     
  20. ParaElite

    ParaElite Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2008
    Messages:
    167
    Fulton Armory has a database of information on the issue of cast or forging on the M14/M1A. The Chicom receivers are highly rated as to dimensions and metalurgy and the heat treatment of the receiver has to be done correctly. If not done correctly or the dimensions are off you will have head space and timing issues.
     
  21. Pilot

    Pilot Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    6,605
    Location:
    USA
    Mauser K98k bolt action.
     
  22. paintballdude902

    paintballdude902 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    Messages:
    2,872
  23. G17Steve

    G17Steve Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2007
    Messages:
    42
    Location:
    Spring Hill Florida
    The AK is technically not an MBR.

    The FAL gets my vote.
     
  24. Texasred

    Texasred Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2006
    Messages:
    497
    Location:
    Houston, Tx
    I figured the Garand was similar enough to the M-14 series. But sorry I didn't include it. I was also thinking .308, and I know that they make Garands in said caliber but they were never widespread enough to make a big impact.
     
  25. HorseSoldier

    HorseSoldier Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2006
    Messages:
    5,297
    Location:
    Anchorage, AK
    And I think the Finns are still using Moisin-Nagant receivers (some built in the 1890s) as the basis for current military sniper rifles.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page