Which Would You Choose, Italy or India-made Repros?

Which Would You Choose, Italy (Pedersoli) or India-made Black Powder Reproductions!?

  • I'd buy an India-made black powder reproduction musket as they're better quality than a Pedersoli.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    49
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
whew, what a blow up, I bet that smarted some. Now as to the quality of Indian firearms, yes the Indians can make acceptable weapons, don't forget, they made many a Lee-Enfield and Stens and Brens, but that was under strict British scurtiny. Who runs these muzzle loading outfits there? Would I buy an Indian musket, only if I knew it was made correctly to handle normal black powder loads. At the current time, the Italians make some fairly nice replicas, though, their steel is a bit soft too in some of their 1860s and 1858s. SASS members who buy Peacemaker replicas often have them worked over by the addition of properly heat treated parts too.
 
I have an indian made 2 band enfield. For 225 I knew I couldnt do much better for my confederate interpratation. NOW I havent shot it live yet but offhad I know the barrel is marked that its a 55 cal barrel and said something along the lines of max charge 2 and a half drams(could be wrong dont have the gun with me currently). It has all sorts of markings on it and is more historically correct then most Italian models. A few weeks back I shot at minimum 100 blanks at 60 grains a pop out of it, easially 50 or so without cleaning with no issues. I would buy another one at the right price. Will I ever shoot it live I dont know. I do know it has a pistol nipple on it though, And Ill have to replace that eventually so I stop loosing caps in the field.

My 2 cents

Gambit
 
I've owned many Pedersoli's....mostly Sharps and one Mortimer...

My one Middlesex Village Trading Co's Indian made gun is the most accurate gun out of the box that I have owned. It's a Ketland and I managed to redo the lock, stock and barrel to make it more than acceptable to my standards...
 
Post hoc ergo proctor hoc

Actually, it's Post hoc ergo proPtor hoc, but yes it's a fallacy, just as the previous ones that all muskets are unsafe when made in India, see cum hoc ergo propter hoc, . :D Neither assertion proves anything. Nore does proofing do more than give a buyer the feeling of safety. One can proof any barrel by one's self, by simply following the link that I provided. :D If one demand's proofing..., which would also include American made barrels as well.

LD
 
I have had both.I had a very nice Indian made Enfield Cavalry carbine [different from the Musketoon, or Artillery Carbine] and it shot very nicely, indeed.I REALLY should never have got off of that carbine....
 
I have two of the India-made guns from Middlesex Village, a steel-barrelled blunderbuss (not the doglock, unfortunately, but alas, they were out of stock for a while), and the double-barrelled percussion howdah pistol.

I haven't had a chance to shoot the blunderbuss yet - I'm awaiting the arrival of a .311 ball mold so I can cast my own buckshot - but the lock sparks beautifully and the fit and finish, if not up to Pedersoli standards, is acceptable to me. The barrel walls seem quite thick - no tubing here, apparently.

I shot the howdah over the holidays. The right-hand lock needed some minor gunsmithing, as it had a tendency to get caught on half-cock on the way down. The tumbler had burrs and the sear nose was badly shaped, but I have the necessary skills to fix minor problems like that (took a course in gunsmithing from Penn Foster a few years ago). The nipples are oversized for #11 caps and undersized for regular musket caps (I have since been told that British musket caps tend to be a bit smaller than US musket caps), but musket caps will stay on if you pinch them and the nipples will eventually be replaced with "modern" machine-made ones. My load was 55 grains of FFg KIK powder, a pillow-ticking patch greased with "Bore Butter", and a .600 round ball. Recoil was not unpleasant, gun didn't blow up, no problems (once the lock was fixed).

So far, I'm happy with both guns.

I also have a P-1853 I bought in "as found, uncleaned condition" from IMA a couple of years ago, and which I had reworked by Todd Watts at The Blockade Runner (refinished, British marks added, etc) so I can use it as a reenactment gun. I pulled the breechplug to clean and inspect the bore (some pitting, as expected, but not to an unsafe level), and test-fired it, and it, too, is safe to shoot with live rounds. These were made under British supervision, IIRC, so I'm not really surprised.

No, I would not hesitate to buy more India-made guns from a reputable importer like Loyalist Arms or MVTCo. The Indian guns tend to come in more varieties than Italian or Japanese guns, and the real rarities (wheel-locks, English locks, and matchlocks) tend to be more affordable than the alternative - which seems to be custom guns for most of these ancient lock mechanisms (Loyalist sells a wheel-lock for about $700.00. Try to get Pedersoli to make one for that price - I dare you!).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top