Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Who makes synthetic stocks for an SKS?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Kestrel, Oct 11, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Kestrel

    Kestrel Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,168
    I'm trying to lighten up my SKS. Who makes a good synthetic stock for them? Also, is there any other way to lighten them up?

    Thanks,
    Steve
     
  2. Futo Inu

    Futo Inu member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2003
    Messages:
    731
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    Butler Creek and Ramline, maybe others.

    http://www.midwayusa.com/rewriteaproduct/278428

    Some have hollow buttstocks - these would be even lighter.

    To lighten the SKS I used to have, I just dremel-cut the bayo lug completely off as close to the bbl as possible, along with the bipod I had had connected via this lug. Beyond that, dunno how to lighten it.
     
  3. DMK

    DMK Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,763
    Location:
    Over the hills and far, far away
    There was a thread on Survivors SKS forum where they were comparing the synthetic stocks to the originals. It turns out that the aftermarket stocks were heavier! Even those specifically marketed as light weight. :rolleyes:


    You don't say what kind of SKS you have, but the lightest stock is probably the original Norinco wood stocks. The fiberglass "Jungle Stocks" weigh about the same.
     
  4. bbrins

    bbrins Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2002
    Messages:
    216
    Location:
    Maryland
  5. yayarx7

    yayarx7 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    350
    Location:
    Fort Worth, TEXAS
    The SKS runs like a truck. Heavy and nonstop :D

    I would love to lighten one up but I cannot see how. The bolt weighs a ton, maybe an aluminum receiver? Anything I can think of requires complete re-engineering.
     
  6. bdhawk

    bdhawk Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    196
  7. makarov

    makarov Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    336
    Many people reccommend Choate stocks for the SKS. I have an old Monte Carlo on one of mine marked Combat somethingorother... It is a decent stock. The reviews on ATI are mixed. I am considering getting an ATI for my SKS Sporter only because they are the only company that seems to make one for this SKS variant (takes AK mags). If anyone knows of another company that makes a drop in stock for this gun let me know.

    You might try.

    sksman.com

    http://www.combatstocks.com/
     
  8. makarov

    makarov Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    336
    By the way the poster that indicated that wood was probably lighter is right. We are not talking about high density hardwood here. The stock SKS I have is lighter than the one with the Monte Carlo stock by far. Can't compare a Fiberforce style for folding stock style. I imagine those would be lighter than the nylon Monte Carlos.

    Wood is still a good option for stocks. I really like my all original SKS. It does have a rubber buttpad that extends the LOP about an inch. The SKS Sporter is the lightest of the bunch. It has a shorter barrel though.
     
  9. Mike Irwin

    Mike Irwin Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    7,956
    Location:
    Below the Manson-Nixon line in Virginia...
    I have a Choat stock on mine.

    Want to see it, being shot by a friend?

    Find a copy of the April 1994 American Rifleman magazine. :)
     
  10. Kestrel

    Kestrel Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,168
    Thanks for all the replies. Maybe I'll just forget trying to make it lighter and look to making it fit me better. Sounds like I might get better LOP if I get one of the synthetic stocks.

    Is the Choate better than the Ramline? Is there a Hogue or something better?

    Thanks again,
    Steve
     
  11. MAKOwner

    MAKOwner Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    682
    I've got the Choate Dragunov-style stock on mine, very nice. Can't comment on the Ramline and Hogue stocks, but the Choate is worlds better than the ATI POS I used to have... ATI's drag-style stock is crap compared to the Choate, it's cheaper though so...
     
  12. dave3006

    dave3006 member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2003
    Messages:
    898
    I love the Choate dragunov I put on mine.
     
  13. rayra

    rayra member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2003
    Messages:
    654
    Location:
    L.A., **********
    Prefer the Ramline stock myself - the increased Length of Pull was very welcome -

    [​IMG]
     
  14. Caliburn

    Caliburn Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    142
    Location:
    Colorado
    Nice family photo there, rayra!

    Avoid the ATI Dragunov stock -- there is a huge unnecessary hump of plastic that sticks up right behing the receiver cover which makes it IMPOSSIBLE to field strip without taking the stock off (which is a pain anyway). Some very careful hacksaw work will remove that hump, but going with a Choate is easier.

    You can see it here if you look carefully http://www.atigunstocks.com/sksfiber.html
    follow the line of the pistol grip straight up to the back of the receiver cover. Compare that picture to the monte carlo http://www.atigunstocks.com/sksmonte.html which doesn't have that hump.

    You'd think ATI would have corrected it by now... :rolleyes:
     
  15. rayra

    rayra member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2003
    Messages:
    654
    Location:
    L.A., **********
    Thankyouverymuch.

    /Elvis
     
  16. Kestrel

    Kestrel Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,168
    What is the difference between the Choate and Ramline stocks (standatd - not dragonov)? Which is considered to be higher quality?

    Thanks,
    Steve
     
  17. rayra

    rayra member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2003
    Messages:
    654
    Location:
    L.A., **********
    A cursory inspection of both didn't leave me with any impression of major differences between them.
    The Ramline doesn't come with a recoil pad, the Choate does, but for 7.62x39, who needs one?
    They (and the Butler Creek version) only seem to differ in the styling of the grip. And they are all within a couple dollars of each other.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page